Any recommendations regarding the JVM to use with CF9? I have updated mine
but if there is a specific version that people have found best I would love
to hear
Steve
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
cfaussie group.
To post to this group, send
Adobe recommend and officially support 1.6.24 which is what I run in
production. Not sure if there is any Benicia going higher but you should goto
.24 to addresses issues with earlier releases
Paul Kukiel
On 17/11/2011, at 2:09 PM, Steve Onnis st...@cfcentral.com.au wrote:
Any
I am currently running 1.6.0_21
What version was shipped with CF9?
From: Paul Kukiel [mailto:kuki...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 17 November 2011 2:13 PM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [cfaussie] Best JVM version to use with CF9
Adobe recommend and officially support 1.6.24
.17 with 9 and I think .21 with 9.01 in September this year Adobe announced the
recommend .24 and that it's officially tested and supported
Paul Kukiel
On 17/11/2011, at 2:16 PM, Steve Onnis st...@cfcentral.com.au wrote:
I am currently running 1.6.0_21
What version was shipped with CF9?
Yep, more background and detail here, for what it may be worth beyond the
main point Paul has made:
http://www.carehart.org/blog/client/index.cfm/2011/10/28/CF911-Have-you-upda
ted-your-ColdFusion-JVM-to-24-yet-Important-security-fix-for-CF-89
/charlie
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Thanks for that. The update is recommended because of the bug only it seems
to me, but it doesn't mention anything about any type of performance
increases. Is this the case?
From: charlie arehart [mailto:charlie_li...@carehart.org]
Sent: Thursday, 17 November 2011 3:06 PM
To:
It might be worth checking the release notes for the bug fix or performance
improvement you're looking for;
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/releasenotes-136954.html
On 17/11/2011, at 15:26, Steve Onnis st...@cfcentral.com.au wrote:
Thanks for that. The update is recommended
I'm not aware of any particularly impressive performance increases, no, at
least not for those on CF 9. Of course, those on CF 8 or 8.01, who were
still running 1.6.0_04 or earlier by default WILL see a performance increase
by getting past the bug fixed in _10 (discussed in the blog entry), but
So following up my note below, I was talking about how changing the JVM is
rarely the key solution to solving CF performance problems (except that one
instance of the JVM bug prior to 1.6.0_10). I was saying that there are many
other more usual suspects. And really, they are hardly ever about
Can anyone recommend and caching techniques or products to assist with some
caching for high volume applications?
Steve
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
cfaussie group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe
Hey Steve, I have categories for such caching solutions, both within and
outside of CF, in my CF411 site:
http://www.cf411.com/cache
http://www.cf411.com/distcache
(To be clear, I don't offer recommendations of the tools, but instead list
them to provide alternatives to consider.)
Hope
11 matches
Mail list logo
