Haha,
It's purely for logging
Ie
Ice.cfc ran @ 12:45pm called by Decrypt.cfc
Regards
Dale Fraser
-Original Message-
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Barry Beattie
Sent: Friday, 14 July 2006 13:23 PM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: [cfaus
Dale, are you really sure you want to tie your CFC up with whatever
view runs the request?
sure I don't know the full details but are you *really, really, REALY*
sure that's what you want inside your CFC?
forgive me for asking, I heard an "alarm" ringing...
("the bells! the bells!")
On 7/14/0
Cheers
Gareth.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more
GetCurrentTemplatePath()As for the component that calls a given function, possibly caller scope is available (like in tags/modules) but you may have to pass it into the function as an argument.Blair
On 7/14/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not sure that's what I want.From a cfc I need to
Not sure that's what I want.
>From a cfc I need to be able to work out.
What page called me
Or
What component called me
Regards
Dale Fraser
-Original Message-
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Sent: Friday, 14 July 2006 11:10 AM
To: cfaussie
S
Hi folks,
we are going to hold probably the first class on Flex 2
development in this area (over in Wellington, NZ) during
the first week of August.
There are a few seats left, and it will be the 3-day class
"Flex 2: Developing Rich Client Applications".
The price is NZ$ 1,690 + GST (roughly
I can by puttin it in the url. Like a refer. then I program it so it
says I'm coming from this component.
Is that what you mean?
Jeremy
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"cfaussie" group.
To post to
Heya,
I have to admit that I'm a big supporter of using frameworks, because
they offer a lot
of benefits for one's development work, such as a standardized way of
doing things
within a team.
With the given amount of frameworks out there, it is hard to get an
overview of
pros and cons of each of
> if CF8 has some extra OO stuff (which it should) then you might regret using
> a framework at all. But even with the current model, you can do proper cfc
> development.
Huh?
You mean better OO stuff like Java has? A lot of J2EE development is
still done using frameworks, so I don't think the "
Can you determine what page or component called the
current cfc.
Regards
Dale Fraser
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@g
So much work on, I need to outsource an XML Proof-of-concept research
project to turn our PDF document based CF web site to XML/data.
Can't seem to find any local XML specific groups to post a request to.
Any suggestions please?
Off group reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you
like...
--~--~---
Hi Jeremy,
can you explain a bit more about this?
It seems like you know why this is happening?
I am aware that the user could have HTML turned off, thats not a worry. Thanks.
On 7/13/06, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey Taco,You need to program outlook not to ditch the logo. Hope you are good at
One good OO approach that will only get better and stay forever
cfc's
There is nothing stopping you writing an OO solution using pure cfc's.
if CF8 has some extra OO stuff (which it should) then you might regret using
a framework at all. But even with the current model, you can do proper cfc
de
Hey,
See this is my point. everyone reckons one methodology is better then
the next or like M@ said right tool for the right job. I guess my issue
is choosing the right tool. I thing Greg has it right. OOP is the way
to go. Having to deal with .NET and Powerbuilder freaks here at work
the one thi
Hi Robin,Nice work that you did on the AFR project.The last seesion that you had in Melbourne with Flash and Cairngorm was nice.I think Flex basics is one thing but i'm not sure how many developers would be interested.
If you had more a hardcore session on AS3 and say Component Developement i would
At work we use Fusebox my team is 4.1 with reactor (which me no like)another team is migrating from 3.0 to 5.0 (with reactor)another team is on 4.1another team is on 5.0 another team on 4.1
Personally I'll wait till fusebox 5.1 before I make the move to 5. Sean corfield is doing a brilliant job wi
16 matches
Mail list logo
