[cfaussie] Re: Webservice Confusion

2007-01-24 Thread Dale Fraser
s.com Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Webservice Confusion Was that from a browser outside the lan? If so, then yes, at least it shows that it's not a general inability to access the web service "from outside the lan". Sounds intriguing. Do let us know how it resolves. /Charlie htt

[cfaussie] Re: Webservice Confusion

2007-01-24 Thread Charlie Arehart
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dale Fraser Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 2:55 PM To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Webservice Confusion Yes that works, So I guess it's a client problem. Regards Dale Fraser _ From: cfaus

[cfaussie] Re: Webservice Confusion

2007-01-24 Thread Dale Fraser
Yes that works, So I guess it's a client problem. Regards Dale Fraser _ From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charlie Arehart Sent: Thursday, 25 January 2007 1:14 AM To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Webservice Conf

[cfaussie] Re: Webservice Confusion

2007-01-24 Thread Dale Fraser
I haven't tried externally. But a test page on the same server works. Regards Dale Fraser -Original Message- From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Onnis Sent: Wednesday, 24 January 2007 11:29 PM To: cfaussie Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Webse

[cfaussie] Re: Webservice Confusion

2007-01-24 Thread Charlie Arehart
Dale, can you try calling the webservice using ?wsdl&method=methodname? That works if the methodname takes no args, or if it takes simple args you can add them as &parm1=parm1value. Does that give you a response? It may give clues. If you do it in a browser, be sure to do a "view source" to see

[cfaussie] Re: Webservice Confusion

2007-01-24 Thread Steve Onnis
can you call it using cf? steve On Jan 24, 9:47 pm, "Dale Fraser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a webservice. Access="remote" > > Am calling this from a client c++ application and it works fine, however > that's when we are on the internal LAN. > > When external, it fails. Even though we a

[cfaussie] Re: webservice confusion

2006-05-23 Thread Geoff Bowers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > so for example they would be doing this: > > > Whats up with that? I dont understand why the docs say required, but > goog has not required. > > Do I really have to have required=yes for every param? What happens if > its no and the consumer doesnt pass in a blankvalue/

[cfaussie] Re: webservice confusion

2006-05-23 Thread Duncan
It would appear that the defaults for a non required parameter doesnt get pased into the wsdl, that might be the reason - any one have any feedback on this? On 5/23/06, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would agree with you for a regular cfc, but here we are referring to > a webservice and t

[cfaussie] Re: webservice confusion

2006-05-22 Thread Duncan
I would agree with you for a regular cfc, but here we are referring to a webservice and the docs expicitly say Note: All arguments are required when invoked as a web service, irrespective of how they are defined. So I dont quite know why this would be the case. Clearly you need to define vars an

[cfaussie] Re: webservice confusion

2006-05-22 Thread Mark Ireland
I think required="yes" just means that there is some code (usually SQL) in the component that will not work without the argument. Usually cfif isDefined("arguments.myArgument")> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Reply-To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com >To: "cfaussie" >Subject: [cfaussie] webservice conf