Hi Dale,
how dynamic is the site?
A modified sitemap tool might work for most of that if things are fairly
static. Walk through the site building a huge map of all links and then
see what you have that is not on the list.
On 21/12/2011 9:34 PM, Dale Fraser wrote:
I’m looking for something
Subject: Re: [cfaussie] Unused Files
Hi Dale,
how dynamic is the site?
A modified sitemap tool might work for most of that if things are fairly
static. Walk through the site building a huge map of all links and then see
what you have that is not on the list.
On 21/12/2011 9:34 PM, Dale Fraser
: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 9:57 PM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [cfaussie] Unused Files
Hi Dale,
how dynamic is the site?
A modified sitemap tool might work for most of that if things are fairly
static. Walk through the site building a huge map of all links and then
see what you
Besides the ideas shared so far, I have another couple of thoughts. That
said, neither is the perfect answer for you, nor is there one to be honest.
There's been talk of such code coverage tools for CF, but to date none
exist (as far as I know).
As for what CFM and assets are accessed, you could
Actually a tool like this would not be hard to write, the only downside is
that it would take a very long time to run in CFML though.
It would be a very good candidate as an extension to CFBuilder, the images
would be just find all with known image extensions and search for known
links in the
