It looks like you might have attached the wrong diff. It contains nothing
but formatting changes as far as I can tell.
Indeed. Sorry about that. Here is the whole patch. It is however
unformatted.
Bests,
Gonzalo
P.S: I tried to find how to format the diff with clang-format. The only way
I
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Gonzalo BG gonzalob...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks like you might have attached the wrong diff. It contains nothing
but formatting changes as far as I can tell.
Indeed. Sorry about that. Here is the whole patch. It is however
unformatted.
Bests,
Gonzalo
Thanks!
I just tried it and the following works fine:
svn diff --diff-cmd=diff -x-U0 | tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py
Maybe one could add a single line to the llvm docs (here:
http://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangFormat.html) explaining how to use it with
svn since there is only an
Submitted patch and added SVN usage instructions in r208765 and r208766,
respectively.
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Gonzalo BG gonzalob...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks!
I just tried it and the following works fine:
svn diff --diff-cmd=diff -x-U0 | tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py
It looks like you might have attached the wrong diff. It contains nothing
but formatting changes as far as I can tell.
Cheers,
Daniel
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Gonzalo BG gonzalob...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch adds a new option AllowSimpleBracedStatements that allows
braced
This patch adds a new option AllowSimpleBracedStatements that allows
braced statements to be considered as simple. That is, if
AllowShortIfStatementsOnASingleLine and AllowShortLoopStatementsOnASingle
line are enabled, code like:
if (true) {
f();
}
can be wrapped into a single line as:
if
