On Jun 30, 2014, at 11:31 AM, Reid Kleckner r...@google.com wrote:
This is really a question for John, but I have a feeling that he'll be happy
to see this code go.
Yes, killing the hack is long-overdue.
John.
___
cfe-commits mailing list
Thanks. Committed as r212097.
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 2:05 PM, John McCall rjmcc...@apple.com wrote:
On Jun 30, 2014, at 11:31 AM, Reid Kleckner r...@google.com wrote:
This is really a question for John, but I have a feeling that he'll be
happy to see this code go.
Yes, killing the hack
Hi,
I would like to propose to remove the CleanupHackLevel from
CGException.cpp. This hack was originally written for the old exception
handling intrinsics, which have several issues with function inliner.
(Read [1] for more background on this hack.)
Since LLVM 3.0, the new exception handling
This is really a question for John, but I have a feeling that he'll be
happy to see this code go.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Logan Chien tzuhsiang.ch...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose to remove the CleanupHackLevel from
CGException.cpp. This hack was originally written
