On Tuesday, November 06, 2012 12:52 AM, Richard Smith wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Andy Gibbs wrote:
Ok, I've extended the test case to the following...
#define A(...) [ __VA_ARGS__ ]
#define B(...) [ , __VA_ARGS__ ]
#define C(...) [ , ## __VA_ARGS__ ]
#define D(A,...) [ A ,
On Wednesday, November 07, 2012 6:30 PM, Andy Gibbs wrote:
Attached is a replacement patch...
Oops, attached *now* is the replacement patch!
sorry
fix.diff
Description: Binary data
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Andy Gibbs andyg1...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
Please could someone review the attached patch for me before I commit it.
This patch fixes the rules surrounding the removal of a leading comma where
a __VA_ARGS__ expansion is empty.
GCC has the extension,
Le 5 nov. 2012 à 09:08, Eli Friedman eli.fried...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Andy Gibbs andyg1...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
Please could someone review the attached patch for me before I commit it.
This patch fixes the rules surrounding the removal of a leading
On Monday, November 05, 2012 9:50 AM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:
Le 5 nov. 2012 à 09:08, Eli Friedman a écrit :
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Andy Gibbs wrote:
Hi,
Please could someone review the attached patch for me before I commit
it.
This patch fixes the rules surrounding the removal
Le 5 nov. 2012 à 12:07, Andy Gibbs andyg1...@hotmail.co.uk a écrit :
On Monday, November 05, 2012 9:50 AM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:
Le 5 nov. 2012 à 09:08, Eli Friedman a écrit :
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Andy Gibbs wrote:
Hi,
Please could someone review the attached patch for me
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Andy Gibbs andyg1...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
On Monday, November 05, 2012 9:50 AM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:
Le 5 nov. 2012 à 09:08, Eli Friedman a écrit :
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Andy Gibbs wrote:
Hi,
Please could someone review the attached patch for
On Monday, November 05, 2012 6:50 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Andy Gibbs wrote:
Here is the line from the gcc help: ... In this case the C99 standard is
clear that the comma must remain, however the existing GCC extension used
to
swallow the comma. So CPP retains
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Andy Gibbs andyg1...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
On Monday, November 05, 2012 6:50 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Andy Gibbs wrote:
Here is the line from the gcc help: ... In this case the C99 standard is
clear that the comma must remain,
Hi,
Please could someone review the attached patch for me before I commit it.
This patch fixes the rules surrounding the removal of a leading comma where
a __VA_ARGS__ expansion is empty.
GCC has the extension, implemented already in clang for...
#define M(...) call(a, ## __VA_ARGS__)
This
10 matches
Mail list logo
