On Nov 17, 2012, at 4:34 PM, Dmitri Gribenko griboz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Dmitri Gribenko griboz...@gmail.com wrote:
Author: gribozavr
Date: Sat Nov 17 18:30:31 2012
New Revision: 168277
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=168277view=rev
Log:
Hi,
On Nov 17, 2012, at 4:34 PM, Dmitri Gribenko griboz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Dmitri Gribenko griboz...@gmail.com wrote:
Author: gribozavr
Date: Sat Nov 17 18:30:31 2012
New Revision: 168277
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=168277view=rev
Author: gribozavr
Date: Sat Nov 17 18:30:31 2012
New Revision: 168277
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=168277view=rev
Log:
Documentation parsing: propely handle a lone '\endverbatim' and emit a warning.
We actually used to assert on this.
Thanks to NAKAMURA Takumi for noticing this!
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Dmitri Gribenko griboz...@gmail.com wrote:
Author: gribozavr
Date: Sat Nov 17 18:30:31 2012
New Revision: 168277
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=168277view=rev
Log:
Documentation parsing: propely handle a lone '\endverbatim' and emit a
2012/11/18 Dmitri Gribenko griboz...@gmail.com:
Author: gribozavr
Date: Sat Nov 17 18:30:31 2012
New Revision: 168277
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=168277view=rev
Log:
Documentation parsing: propely handle a lone '\endverbatim' and emit a
warning.
We actually used to
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 4:37 AM, NAKAMURA Takumi geek4ci...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you run the test actually? @+2 doesn't point \endcode.
Fixed in r168278.
Thank you!
Dmitri
--
main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;ji;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if
(j){printf(%d\n,i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko