On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Vassil Vassilev
vasil.georgiev.vasi...@cern.ch wrote:
It seems to me not a bad idea: if we are planning to provide better
diagnostics of 'ill-formed' modulemaps. We could use FileCheck but I
thought -verify was invented for such cases.
I agree. We currently
It seems to me not a bad idea: if we are planning to provide better
diagnostics of 'ill-formed' modulemaps. We could use FileCheck but I
thought -verify was invented for such cases.
Vassil
On 11/07/2014 01:09 AM, Jordan Rose wrote:
Is it really worth putting effort into -verify for this? I'd
On Nov 3, 2014, at 2:38 PM, Vassil Vassilev vvasi...@cern.ch wrote:
On 03/11/14 16:49, Ben Langmuir wrote:
On Nov 3, 2014, at 2:10 AM, Vassil Vassilev vvasi...@cern.ch wrote:
Hi guys,
I am working on http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20507 Now the
diagnostic gets issued for:
Is it really worth putting effort into -verify for this? I'd be okay with just
using FileCheck:
// CHECK: {{Inputs[/\\]declare-use[/\\]module.map}}:30:10: note: header file...
Jordan
On Nov 3, 2014, at 2:10 , Vassil Vassilev vvasi...@cern.ch wrote:
Hi guys,
I am working on
Hi guys,
I am working on http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20507 Now the
diagnostic gets issued for:
Clang :: Modules/declare-use1.cpp
Clang :: Modules/declare-use2.cpp
Clang :: Modules/declare-use3.cpp
Clang :: Modules/strict-decluse.cpp
It says smth like:
On Nov 3, 2014, at 2:10 AM, Vassil Vassilev vvasi...@cern.ch wrote:
Hi guys,
I am working on http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20507 Now the
diagnostic gets issued for:
Clang :: Modules/declare-use1.cpp
Clang :: Modules/declare-use2.cpp
Clang :: Modules/declare-use3.cpp
On 03/11/14 16:49, Ben Langmuir wrote:
On Nov 3, 2014, at 2:10 AM, Vassil Vassilev vvasi...@cern.ch wrote:
Hi guys,
I am working on http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20507 Now the diagnostic
gets issued for:
Clang :: Modules/declare-use1.cpp
Clang :: Modules/declare-use2.cpp
