Thanks John,
Committed, with support for other pragma annotation tokens as well, in
r167363.
Cheers,
Lang.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 12:51 PM, John McCall rjmcc...@apple.com wrote:
On Oct 25, 2012, at 1:39 PM, Lang Hames wrote:
Tim Northover pointed out that there's a flaw in my recent
Ping.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Lang Hames lha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Tim Northover pointed out that there's a flaw in my recent FP_CONTRACT
patch (r166383). That patch restricted FP_CONTRACT (or rather
tok::annot_pragma_fp_contract) to appearing as the first token in a
On Oct 25, 2012, at 1:39 PM, Lang Hames wrote:
Tim Northover pointed out that there's a flaw in my recent FP_CONTRACT patch
(r166383). That patch restricted FP_CONTRACT (or rather
tok::annot_pragma_fp_contract) to appearing as the first token in a compound
statement. The problem with my
Hi All,
Tim Northover pointed out that there's a flaw in my recent FP_CONTRACT
patch (r166383). That patch restricted FP_CONTRACT (or rather
tok::annot_pragma_fp_contract) to appearing as the first token in a
compound statement. The problem with my patch is that it prohibits things
like:
void
