Author: majnemer
Date: Sun May 22 00:34:26 2016
New Revision: 270353
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=270353=rev
Log:
[AST] Cleanup comments regarding CXXRecordDecl::isEmpty
We were missing references to the standard, some of our home-grown
verbiage didn't make any sense.
No
Author: compnerd
Date: Sat May 21 22:12:19 2016
New Revision: 270352
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=270352=rev
Log:
Driver: sink getLinuxDynamicLoader into the Toolchain
The parameter already requires the toolchain, sink the method into the class.
This also enables the use of the
Author: compnerd
Date: Sat May 21 20:37:36 2016
New Revision: 270351
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=270351=rev
Log:
Driver: simplify getDynameLinker
Convert the cascading if/else to a switch. This makes it easier to follow the
logic. Minor difference is that we no longer default
kerberizer added a comment.
Dmitry, for a few days now I'm seeing another regression test failure. It has
most likely appeared in the 6 hours frame after r269852, because that's the
period of my automatic builds, and r269852 was the last to pass the tests
successfully. The failure this time is
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL270330: [X86][AVX] Ensure zero-extension of
_mm256_extract_epi8 and _mm256_extract_epi16 (authored by RKSimon).
Changed prior to commit:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D20468?vs=57927=58045#toc
Repository:
Author: rksimon
Date: Sat May 21 16:14:35 2016
New Revision: 270330
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=270330=rev
Log:
[X86][AVX] Ensure zero-extension of _mm256_extract_epi8 and _mm256_extract_epi16
Ensure _mm256_extract_epi8 and _mm256_extract_epi16 zero extend their i8/i16
result
madsravn created this revision.
madsravn added reviewers: alexfh, flx.
madsravn added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
Patch for bug 27475: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27475
I used the suggestion of alexfh to check the header extension.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D20512
Files:
twoh added a comment.
Hmm, yes it seems not so simple to move the call to another place. If I come up
with a better idea I'll submit it as a separate patch, as I don't want to block
this one. Thank you for your work, @faisalv!
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19783
ogoffart created this revision.
ogoffart added reviewers: cfe-commits, rsmith.
It is only a crash if the compiler optimize for this!=nullptr because
LocalInstantiationScope::getPartiallySubstitutedPack checks if 'this' is null.
(This is crashing when clang is compiled with GCC6)
madsravn created this revision.
madsravn added reviewers: alexfh, flx.
madsravn added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
This is fix for bug 27802: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27802
I have added a check to clang-tidy which refrains from putting parantheses
around macros which are variadic.
madsravn added a comment.
@Prazek thanks. I will look into it :)
http://reviews.llvm.org/D20365
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Prazek added a subscriber: Prazek.
Prazek added a comment.
You have to push it by yourself. It's ain't fun if someone do it for you :D
You have to obtain commit access
http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#obtaining-commit-access and then push
it (you can also find in docs how to do it)
madsravn added a comment.
Just curious, as I'm sort of new to this. How long will it take before its
merged in?
http://reviews.llvm.org/D20365
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
13 matches
Mail list logo
