This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rG2214b9076f1d: [clangd] Make signatureHelp work with stale
preambles (authored by kadircet).
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77392/new/
Author: Kadir Cetinkaya
Date: 2020-04-21T10:27:26+02:00
New Revision: 2214b9076f1d3a4784820c4479e2417685e5c980
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2214b9076f1d3a4784820c4479e2417685e5c980
DIFF:
Author: Kadir Cetinkaya
Date: 2020-04-21T10:27:26+02:00
New Revision: 6e017188b7607eb0f0b248881319bfd803cb8f78
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6e017188b7607eb0f0b248881319bfd803cb8f78
DIFF:
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rGe90fb82f0f76: [AST] Suppress the spammy attempt to use
a deleted fucntion diagnostic. (authored by hokein).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D78100?vs=257689=258918#toc
Repository:
kadircet updated this revision to Diff 258915.
kadircet marked 2 inline comments as done.
kadircet added a comment.
- Make scanPreambleIncludes return an Expected>
- Bail out in case of errors, document the rational.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
kadircet marked an inline comment as done.
kadircet added inline comments.
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/Preamble.cpp:281
+ // We are only interested in newly added includes.
+ llvm::StringSet<> ExistingIncludes;
+ for (const auto : Preamble.LexedIncludes)
Author: Haojian Wu
Date: 2020-04-21T09:43:46+02:00
New Revision: e90fb82f0f760703c14eafbad96c08b6019a2f0f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e90fb82f0f760703c14eafbad96c08b6019a2f0f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e90fb82f0f760703c14eafbad96c08b6019a2f0f.diff
balazske added a comment.
Finally I had to make the decision to remove the `ErrorKindTy` enum and use
boolean flags instead for every possible error (including no error). This is
needed because we do not know always what error is possible if it is "unknown".
It could be determined from the
lebedev.ri added subscribers: llvm-commits, lebedev.ri.
lebedev.ri added a comment.
This should really be reviewed on llvm-commits.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D78491/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D78491
smeenai added reviewers: beanz, phosek.
smeenai added subscribers: phosek, beanz.
smeenai added a comment.
This makes sense to me, but I'd like @beanz and/or @phosek to take a look as
well.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D78534/new/
nridge accepted this revision.
nridge added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Thanks, Sam, this looks great!
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/SourceCode.cpp:883
+static bool isLikelyIdentifier(llvm::StringRef Word, StringRef Before,
+
101 - 111 of 111 matches
Mail list logo