https://github.com/DonatNagyE edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70837
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Snape3058 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71073
Following PR #70792 for issue #70464
Add a test case for issue #59493
>From 90d72a1f1036d2486e66c5ec16c3a8dc4241fc00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ella Ma
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 23:14:15 +0800
Subject:
https://github.com/markoshorro created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71072
The same idea as in 34d380e1f63a7e2cdb9ab1e6498f727fcd710a14, but for
truncation instructions.
Improvement for #59633.
>From 0c5299adb30888aa0dfd7c3106547a69606d5ab1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marcos
https://github.com/DavidTruby updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70833
>From 9e84729cada6c032c64934ee519e605407aab049 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Truby
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 15:07:13 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [flang][windows] Add option to link against specific MSVC
pogo59 wrote:
If you want to XFAIL specifically for the Sony targets, what you suggested
would work.
I'm unclear about the "MSVC C++ ABI" aspect, but if that gets the test to work,
go for it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70991
___
Author: Dan Klishch
Date: 2023-11-02T11:52:57-04:00
New Revision: 43feb3eeb1ba4de920d6eaa12b7a5c21f6dd6229
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/43feb3eeb1ba4de920d6eaa12b7a5c21f6dd6229
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/43feb3eeb1ba4de920d6eaa12b7a5c21f6dd6229.diff
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 3aad77ebc37532a6a3836d902d0014391ed0a0eb
d93ec3a6ba414483efd6126fc7a953228b5e4150 --
https://github.com/nico closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70978
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
nikic wrote:
@pmatos If you don't want to go all the way to target extension types, is it
possible to gracefully handle this in wasm's TTI cost model? Return an invalid
or very high cost in this case?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71069
https://github.com/pmatos created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71069
Fixes #69894 .
>From deb62d806b4bba983d771eb87c3188a3fc3d56d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paulo Matos
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 09:01:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [WebAssembly] Reftypes are not valid element
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
Author: Markos Horro (markoshorro)
Changes
The same idea as in 34d380e1f63a7e2cdb9ab1e6498f727fcd710a14, but for
truncation instructions.
Improvement for #59633.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71072.diff
2
@@ -30,3 +30,24 @@ void test(int i) {
clang_analyzer_dump(g4);
// expected-warning@-1 {{ [as 64 bit integer]}}
}
+
+struct A {
+ int n;
+ void set(int x) {
+n = x;
+ }
+};
+using ptr_size = decltype(sizeof(void *));
DonatNagyE wrote:
Do I see it
Snape3058 wrote:
OK, thanks~
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70792
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -7416,3 +7416,69 @@ that ``p->array`` must have at least ``p->count`` number
of elements available:
}];
}
+
+def CoroOnlyDestroyWhenCompleteDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatDecl;
+ let Content = [{
+The `coro_only_destroy_when_complete` attribute should
pmatos wrote:
cc: @nikic @jcranmer-intel @tlively @asb
I am looking for suggestions for a way forward on this. Issue #69894 triggers
the SLPVectorizer that tries to create a vector of 2 externref and calculate
its cost. Externref is a WebAssembly type currently represented as a pointer to
a
@@ -7416,3 +7416,69 @@ that ``p->array`` must have at least ``p->count`` number
of elements available:
}];
}
+
+def CoroOnlyDestroyWhenCompleteDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatDecl;
+ let Content = [{
+The `coro_only_destroy_when_complete` attribute should
https://github.com/kmclaughlin-arm closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70959
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
steakhal wrote:
> Do I need to
>
> * create a new PR?
>
> * push directly to this PR on the original branch `Snape3058:issue-70464`?
>
> * commit directly without revision?
>
>
> Which operation is correct?
>
> (Sorry for not familiar with GitHub) -(
I'd prefer a new PR, and
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+; RUN: not llc -verify-machineinstrs -o - -mtriple=amdgcn-unknown-amdhsa
-mcpu=gfx900 -code-model=tiny < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=TINY
+; RUN: not llc -verify-machineinstrs -o - -mtriple=amdgcn-unknown-amdhsa
-mcpu=gfx900 -code-model=kernel < %s
https://github.com/diggerlin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67999
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
kadircet wrote:
thanks for the revert! I also encountered certain crashes bisecting back to
this patch, with a similar reproducer:
```
template
struct Module {
template
struct Baz {
template
explicit Baz(X);
};
Baz(int) -> Baz;
};
struct Bar {};
void foo() { Module::Baz
https://github.com/nico approved this pull request.
lgtm
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70978
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -421,13 +421,102 @@ void AIX::AddCXXStdlibLibArgs(const llvm::opt::ArgList
,
llvm_unreachable("Unexpected C++ library type; only libc++ is supported.");
}
+// This function processes all the mtocdata options to build the final
+// simplified toc data options to pass to
Snape3058 wrote:
Do I need to
* create a new PR?
* push directly to this PR on the original branch `Snape3058:issue-70464`?
* commit directly without revision?
Which operation is correct?
(Sorry for not familiar with GitHub) -(
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70792
https://github.com/DavidTruby updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70833
>From 9e84729cada6c032c64934ee519e605407aab049 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Truby
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 15:07:13 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [flang][windows] Add option to link against specific MSVC
ZequanWu wrote:
> @ZequanWu this seems to cause issues on macOS:
> https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/job/clang-stage1-RA/36184/console
>
> ```
> Profile-x86_64 :: Darwin/instrprof-debug-info-correlate.c
> Profile-x86_64 :: instrprof-darwin-
> Profile-x86_64h ::
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -triple powerpc-unknown-aix -S -mtocdata=g1,g2,g3
-emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-MIX --match-full-lines
diggerlin wrote:
I am not sure the purpose of the test case, I think all the test scenario have
https://github.com/stefanp-ibm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70255
>From c57979d3d86362df239d3d3ff8cda124d40bb79d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefan Pintilie
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 15:21:11 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [PowerPC] Add an alias for -mregnames so that full
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71014
>From a2dae250abf20d47a7db4da65e25ff33bca28e67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuanqi Xu
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 11:11:59 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Coroutines] Introduce
pogo59 wrote:
FTR, the "Worker" tab on that buildbot page will point you to the maintainer.
But tagging me is also fine in general.
I'm unable to repro the problem locally because my local build doesn't seem to
include clang-repl.exe, so the whole clang/test/Interpreter directory is
https://github.com/chandankds closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71043
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Snape3058 wrote:
As #59493 is an array, which is different from the test case I provided and the
ones in #61919 and #54533,
although this pr can correctly handle the array case, do I still need to add
the array one to the test case?
```cpp
// Additional test case from issue #59493
namespace
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+; RUN: not --crash llc -mtriple powerpc-ibm-aix-xcoff < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
--check-prefix CHECK-ERROR
+; RUN: not --crash llc -mtriple powerpc64-ibm-aix-xcoff < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck
%s --check-prefix CHECK-ERROR
+
+@a = global [5 x i16] zeroinitializer,
@@ -7416,3 +7416,69 @@ that ``p->array`` must have at least ``p->count`` number
of elements available:
}];
}
+
+def CoroOnlyDestroyWhenCompleteDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatDecl;
+ let Content = [{
+The `coro_only_destroy_when_complete` attribute should
steakhal wrote:
> As #59493 is an array, which is different from the test case I provided and
> the ones in #61919 and #54533, although this pr can correctly handle the
> array case, do I still need to add the array one to the test case?
It would be really nice if you could. Thanks!
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
CFE + Release note LGTM. Again, please wait on someone to be review the LLVM
changes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71014
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/hnrklssn commented:
LGTM, but I'm not very familiar with the C++ specific parts of clang, so
someone else ought to take a look also
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70886
___
cfe-commits mailing list
@@ -7416,3 +7416,69 @@ that ``p->array`` must have at least ``p->count`` number
of elements available:
}];
}
+
+def CoroOnlyDestroyWhenCompleteDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatDecl;
+ let Content = [{
+The `coro_only_destroy_when_complete` attribute should
@@ -7416,3 +7416,69 @@ that ``p->array`` must have at least ``p->count`` number
of elements available:
}];
}
+
+def CoroOnlyDestroyWhenCompleteDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatDecl;
+ let Content = [{
+The `coro_only_destroy_when_complete` attribute should
@@ -7416,3 +7416,69 @@ that ``p->array`` must have at least ``p->count`` number
of elements available:
}];
}
+
+def CoroOnlyDestroyWhenCompleteDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatDecl;
+ let Content = [{
+The `coro_only_destroy_when_complete` attribute should
erichkeane wrote:
Also note: This needs a Release Note in ReleaseNotes.rst.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71014
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -7416,3 +7416,69 @@ that ``p->array`` must have at least ``p->count`` number
of elements available:
}];
}
+
+def CoroOnlyDestroyWhenCompleteDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatDecl;
+ let Content = [{
+The `coro_only_destroy_when_complete` attribute should
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -217,80 +326,71 @@ void ArrayBoundCheckerV2::checkLocation(SVal location,
bool isLoad,
// MallocChecker that call SValBuilder::getConjuredHeapSymbolVal()) and
// non-symbolic regions (e.g. a
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+// REQUIRES: powerpc-registered-target
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -triple=powerpc-ibm-aix-xcoff -S
-mtocdata=h,g,f,e,d,c,b,a,globalOneWithAlias,globalTwoWithAlias,ll,t3 -verify
-emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK --match-full-lines
+// RUN:
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
CFE stuff looks good, but someone more familiar with the LLVM changes needs to
do final approval.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71014
___
cfe-commits mailing list
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -triple powerpc-ibm-aix-xcoff -S
-mtocdata=a4,a5,a8,a9,b,c,d,e,v -emit-llvm -o - 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefixes=CHECK32 --match-full-lines
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -triple powerpc-ibm-aix-xcoff -S -mtocdata
@@ -7416,3 +7416,69 @@ that ``p->array`` must have at least ``p->count`` number
of elements available:
}];
}
+
+def CoroOnlyDestroyWhenCompleteDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatDecl;
+ let Content = [{
+The `coro_only_destroy_when_complete` attribute should
@@ -265,6 +269,61 @@ bool AIXTargetCodeGenInfo::initDwarfEHRegSizeTable(
return PPC_initDwarfEHRegSizeTable(CGF, Address, Is64Bit, /*IsAIX*/ true);
}
+void AIXTargetCodeGenInfo::setTargetAttributes(
+const Decl *D, llvm::GlobalValue *GV, CodeGen::CodeGenModule ) const {
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71014
>From a2dae250abf20d47a7db4da65e25ff33bca28e67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuanqi Xu
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 11:11:59 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Coroutines] Introduce
https://github.com/pmatos edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71029
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
tbaederr wrote:
> Nice. I realise you're following the convention already established in the
> test file, but have you considered compiling with `-verify=new,both` and
> `-verify=ref,both`, respectively, and combining the shared diagnostics
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -Wno-array-bounds -analyzer-output=text\
+// RUN:
-analyzer-checker=core,alpha.security.ArrayBoundV2,unix.Malloc,alpha.security.taint
-verify %s
https://github.com/erichkeane updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70234
>From b3d64b3f744ccb37e334e3aae8d6874cd8391c56 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: erichkeane
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 11:09:11 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [OpenACC] Initial commit for OpenACC Support
This is the
pmatos wrote:
> Nit: can you add in the description that this is a follow-up from the opaque
> pointer transition (having an explicit motivation helps read a patch). Thanks!
you're right. done.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71029
___
@@ -7416,3 +7416,69 @@ that ``p->array`` must have at least ``p->count`` number
of elements available:
}];
}
+
+def CoroOnlyDestroyWhenCompleteDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatDecl;
+ let Content = [{
+The `coro_only_destroy_when_complete` attribute should
https://github.com/sdesmalen-arm approved this pull request.
This patch was reviewed as part of PR #70662, so I'm happy for this patch to
reland.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70959
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/erichkeane edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71014
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -7416,3 +7416,69 @@ that ``p->array`` must have at least ``p->count`` number
of elements available:
}];
}
+
+def CoroOnlyDestroyWhenCompleteDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatDecl;
+ let Content = [{
+The `coro_only_destroy_when_complete` attribute should
https://github.com/erichkeane commented:
Didn't dig into the LLVM section of this, but the CFE section looks good delta
some small documentation changes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71014
___
cfe-commits mailing list
@@ -7416,3 +7416,69 @@ that ``p->array`` must have at least ``p->count`` number
of elements available:
}];
}
+
+def CoroOnlyDestroyWhenCompleteDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatDecl;
+ let Content = [{
+The `coro_only_destroy_when_complete` attribute should
@@ -7416,3 +7416,69 @@ that ``p->array`` must have at least ``p->count`` number
of elements available:
}];
}
+
+def CoroOnlyDestroyWhenCompleteDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatDecl;
+ let Content = [{
+The `coro_only_destroy_when_complete` attribute should
@@ -605,6 +605,17 @@ static void InitializeStandardPredefinedMacros(const
TargetInfo ,
Builder.defineMacro("HIP_API_PER_THREAD_DEFAULT_STREAM");
}
}
+
+ if (LangOpts.OpenACC) {
+// FIXME: When we have full support for OpenACC, we should set this to the
+
steakhal wrote:
I wanted to highlight that this PR resolved a bunch of open issues, namely:
#61919, #59493, #54533
Thank you!
So I think we should mention this in the release notes for clang-18 in some
way. I'll keep this in mind.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70792
mtrofin wrote:
Nit: can you add in the description that this is a follow-up from the opaque
pointer transition (having an explicit motivation helps read a patch). Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71029
___
cfe-commits mailing list
@@ -1,3 +1,21 @@
add_flang_library(Fortran_main STATIC INSTALL_WITH_TOOLCHAIN
Fortran_main.c
)
+if (DEFINED MSVC)
+add_flang_library(Fortran_main.static STATIC INSTALL_WITH_TOOLCHAIN
+Fortran_main.c
+)
bradking wrote:
The style elsewhere
@@ -976,12 +976,46 @@ bool tools::addOpenMPRuntime(ArgStringList ,
const ToolChain ,
return true;
}
-void tools::addFortranRuntimeLibs(const ToolChain ,
+void tools::addFortranRuntimeLibs(const ToolChain , const ArgList ,
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70349
>From 7329f68092d5f8f5a5978e5a6cbad6ada87d4fe8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 16:09:25 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [clang][NFC] Annotate `Type` bit-fields with
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70600
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -281,3 +281,26 @@ add_flang_library(FortranRuntime
INSTALL_WITH_TOOLCHAIN
)
+
+if (DEFINED MSVC)
+ add_flang_library(FortranRuntime.static ${sources}
+LINK_LIBS
+FortranDecimal.static
+INSTALL_WITH_TOOLCHAIN)
+ set_property(TARGET FortranRuntime.static
https://github.com/kmclaughlin-arm ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70959
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1342,6 +1342,15 @@ def err_opencl_logical_exclusive_or : Error<
def err_openclcxx_virtual_function : Error<
"virtual functions are not supported in C++ for OpenCL">;
+// OpenACC Support.
+def warn_pragma_acc_ignored : Warning<
+ "unexpected '#pragma acc ...' in
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// RUN: %clang -S -### -fopenacc %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
--check-prefix=CHECK-DRIVER
+// CHECK-DRIVER: "-cc1" {{.*}} "-fopenacc"
erichkeane wrote:
At the moment, there should be no problem with them co-existing. Kernels can
be separately
https://github.com/david-arm approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70959
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/peterwaller-arm approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70970
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
yronglin added a comment.
ping～
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D153701/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D153701
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -1996,7 +1996,7 @@ class alignas(TypeAlignment) Type : public
ExtQualsTypeCommonBase {
TypeBits.Dependence = static_cast(Dependence);
TypeBits.CacheValid = false;
TypeBits.CachedLocalOrUnnamed = false;
-TypeBits.CachedLinkage = NoLinkage;
+
@@ -2214,7 +2214,7 @@ void ASTWriter::WriteDeclAbbrevs() {
Abv->Add(BitCodeAbbrevOp(0)); // TSCSpec
Abv->Add(BitCodeAbbrevOp(0)); // InitStyle
Abv->Add(BitCodeAbbrevOp(BitCodeAbbrevOp::Fixed, 1)); // isARCPseudoStrong
-
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71049
>From 05089e60021c321b4113db7e4bdf59bdaaa19de7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 14:40:12 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang][NFC] Refactor `clang::Linkage`
This patch
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM aside from the comment nit from @ChuanqiXu9
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71049
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -2214,7 +2214,7 @@ void ASTWriter::WriteDeclAbbrevs() {
Abv->Add(BitCodeAbbrevOp(0)); // TSCSpec
Abv->Add(BitCodeAbbrevOp(0)); // InitStyle
Abv->Add(BitCodeAbbrevOp(BitCodeAbbrevOp::Fixed, 1)); // isARCPseudoStrong
-
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70349
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -569,4 +569,12 @@ void AnnotateIgnoreWritesEnd(const char *file, int line);
#define LLVM_NO_PROFILE_INSTRUMENT_FUNCTION
#endif
+/// \macro LLVM_PREFERRED_TYPE
+/// Adjust type of bit-field in debug info.
+#if __has_attribute(preferred_type)
AaronBallman
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM aside from a nit with the new macro (feel free to fix when landing).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70349
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -2214,7 +2214,7 @@ void ASTWriter::WriteDeclAbbrevs() {
Abv->Add(BitCodeAbbrevOp(0)); // TSCSpec
Abv->Add(BitCodeAbbrevOp(0)); // InitStyle
Abv->Add(BitCodeAbbrevOp(BitCodeAbbrevOp::Fixed, 1)); // isARCPseudoStrong
-
@@ -2214,7 +2214,7 @@ void ASTWriter::WriteDeclAbbrevs() {
Abv->Add(BitCodeAbbrevOp(0)); // TSCSpec
Abv->Add(BitCodeAbbrevOp(0)); // InitStyle
Abv->Add(BitCodeAbbrevOp(BitCodeAbbrevOp::Fixed, 1)); // isARCPseudoStrong
-
https://github.com/smanna12 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70762
>From 93d46d40f46663cfa30fc01da965887508684e25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Manna, Soumi"
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 21:41:00 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang] Add support for new loop attribute
https://github.com/kiranchandramohan approved this pull request.
LG. Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71043
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2214,7 +2214,7 @@ void ASTWriter::WriteDeclAbbrevs() {
Abv->Add(BitCodeAbbrevOp(0)); // TSCSpec
Abv->Add(BitCodeAbbrevOp(0)); // InitStyle
Abv->Add(BitCodeAbbrevOp(BitCodeAbbrevOp::Fixed, 1)); // isARCPseudoStrong
-
@@ -2214,7 +2214,7 @@ void ASTWriter::WriteDeclAbbrevs() {
Abv->Add(BitCodeAbbrevOp(0)); // TSCSpec
Abv->Add(BitCodeAbbrevOp(0)); // InitStyle
Abv->Add(BitCodeAbbrevOp(BitCodeAbbrevOp::Fixed, 1)); // isARCPseudoStrong
-
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71049
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 approved this pull request.
LGTM. I didn't understand the full context in the private chat.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71049
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
DonatNagyE wrote:
Thanks for the suggestions; I'll probably upload the next revision tomorrow.
> One remark about the review workflow, I'd prefer if the conversation starter
> would resolve the conversations. Let me
@@ -440,6 +440,14 @@ MDNode *LoopInfo::createMetadata(
Ctx, {MDString::get(Ctx, "llvm.loop.parallel_accesses"), AccGroup}));
}
+ // Setting clang::code_align attribute.
+ if (Attrs.CodeAlign > 0) {
smanna12 wrote:
Added consumption on this IR in
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -Wno-array-bounds -analyzer-output=text\
+// RUN:
-analyzer-checker=core,alpha.security.ArrayBoundV2,unix.Malloc,alpha.security.taint
-verify %s
@@ -777,6 +777,12 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitCoroutineBody(const
CoroutineBodyStmt ) {
// LLVM require the frontend to mark the coroutine.
CurFn->setPresplitCoroutine();
+
+ {
+CXXRecordDecl *RD = FnRetTy->getAsCXXRecordDecl();
+if (RD && RD->hasAttr())
+
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71049
>From 05089e60021c321b4113db7e4bdf59bdaaa19de7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 14:40:12 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][NFC] Refactor `clang::Linkage`
This patch
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -217,80 +326,71 @@ void ArrayBoundCheckerV2::checkLocation(SVal location,
bool isLoad,
// MallocChecker that call SValBuilder::getConjuredHeapSymbolVal()) and
// non-symbolic regions (e.g. a
@@ -1921,7 +1920,20 @@ bool NamedDecl::declarationReplaces(NamedDecl *OldD,
bool IsKnownNewer) const {
}
bool NamedDecl::hasLinkage() const {
- return getFormalLinkage() != NoLinkage;
+ switch (getFormalLinkage()) {
+ case Linkage::Invalid:
+llvm_unreachable("Linkage
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Budimir Aranđelović (budimirarandjelovicsyrmia)
Changes
Enable flag -Wmissing-format-attribute to catch missing attributes.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70024.diff
6 Files Affected:
- (modified)
https://github.com/budimirarandjelovicsyrmia updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70024
From 36477198e67e225e6fc686cf08c194438e65d39c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: budimirarandjelovicsyrmia
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 14:45:15 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Catch missing format
201 - 300 of 428 matches
Mail list logo
