https://github.com/tbaederr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71315
>From c4c9473b8be62028f204e85066ad7b0cf7dda29b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 14:57:51 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] EvaluationResult
---
tbaederr wrote:
Ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72614
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
mplatings wrote:
> I'm not actively working on LLVM any more so I'm going to remove myself as
> reviewer now.
Or at least I would if GitHub would let me!
https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/23054
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75031
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/tbaederr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72892
>From 14873b8729e97425049e654adf40fb239ccfab6f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023
@@ -77,10 +77,21 @@ static ToolChain::RTTIMode CalculateRTTIMode(const ArgList
,
return NoRTTI ? ToolChain::RM_Disabled : ToolChain::RM_Enabled;
}
+static ToolChain::ExceptionsMode CalculateExceptionsMode(const ArgList ) {
+
+ Arg *exceptionsArg =
https://github.com/mplatings commented:
I'd be disinclined to add `CachedExceptionsMode`:
* It's more code to maintain.
* Most toolchains will never use it so for them it's a small extra runtime cost
with no benefit.
I think you could calculate the exceptions mode in `getMultilibFlags` when
https://github.com/mplatings edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75031
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
5chmidti wrote:
There is also the use-case to keep a relatively modern code-base in a modern
state. In that case, the user might want to know about
modernizations/deprecations right in the editor.
Example (vscode):
egorzhdan wrote:
@compnerd ping ;)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73017
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: FantasqueX (FantasqueX)
Changes
Currently, if `CLANG_HAVE_LIBXML` is defined, and the version of libxml2 is
above 2.12.0, there will be two warnings when building clang.
warning: initializing 'xmlErrorPtr' (aka 'struct _xmlError *') with
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
https://github.com/FantasqueX created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76719
Currently, if `CLANG_HAVE_LIBXML` is defined, and the version of libxml2 is
above 2.12.0, there will be two warnings when building clang.
warning: initializing 'xmlErrorPtr' (aka 'struct _xmlError *') with
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
Depends on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71919
In CheckConstant(), consider that in C++98 const variables may not be
read at all, and
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76718
Depends on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71919
In CheckConstant(), consider that in C++98 const variables may not be
read at all, and
jyknight wrote:
Ping!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74275
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ilya-biryukov wrote:
This change did not aim to change the behavior, it's quite the opposite, I
tried to guide `clang-format` parsing to recognize attribute and format the
code in the way we always intended it to.
If there is a way to do that without adding the macro names to the
https://github.com/Fznamznon updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75456
>From 0e190f131862dd8f4b07891c3ee712a0a163f936 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Podchishchaeva, Mariya"
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 01:33:17 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Accept recursive non-dependent calls to
@@ -214,6 +214,14 @@
// RUN: -mnan=legacy -mnan=2008 2>&1 \
// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-NAN2008 %s
// CHECK-NAN2008: "-target-feature" "+nan2008"
+// CHECK-NAN2008: "-target-feature" "+abs2008"
MaskRay wrote:
If abs2008 is adjacent, just
https://github.com/MaskRay edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71157
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71157
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -214,6 +214,14 @@
// RUN: -mnan=legacy -mnan=2008 2>&1 \
// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-NAN2008 %s
// CHECK-NAN2008: "-target-feature" "+nan2008"
+// CHECK-NAN2008: "-target-feature" "+abs2008"
+//
+// -mnan=2008 -mabs=legacy
+// RUN: %clang -target
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-01-02T14:18:29+01:00
New Revision: 687c51a3972af17b3f225e692e79fd898a1b6f95
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/687c51a3972af17b3f225e692e79fd898a1b6f95
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/687c51a3972af17b3f225e692e79fd898a1b6f95.diff
ilya-biryukov wrote:
Thanks for reverting it and sorry for the trouble, I will make sure to check
libc++ tests before a reland.
Clang does report less errors now, but that's expected. The errors were
spurious, caused by Clang trying to initialize an "invalid" class (more details
below in case
https://github.com/jayfoad closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76149
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -6106,6 +6106,8 @@ class OMPTeamsGenericLoopDirective final : public
OMPLoopDirective {
class OMPTargetTeamsGenericLoopDirective final : public OMPLoopDirective {
friend class ASTStmtReader;
friend class OMPExecutableDirective;
+ /// true if loop directive's
https://github.com/arsenm approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76149
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Dinar Temirbulatov (dtemirbulatov)
Changes
…ltins.
Patch-by: Caroline Concatto caroline.concatto@arm.com
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76712.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified)
https://github.com/dtemirbulatov created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76712
…ltins.
Patch-by: Caroline Concatto
>From d21c30bb3d655ab66e1ecb2f9b26dc441ca8928a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dinar Temirbulatov
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 12:01:17 +
Subject: [PATCH] [AArch64][SME2]
11happy wrote:
Hello @Endilll Can I work on some other issues also till this PR get reviewed?
Thank you
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76680
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Matthew Devereau (MDevereau)
Changes
The ACLE defines these builtins as svmla[_single]_za32[_f32]_vg1x2, which means
the SVE_ACLE_FUNC macro should test the overloaded forms as
SVE_ACLE_FUNC(svmla,_single,_za32,_f32,_vg1x2)
https://github.com/MDevereau created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76711
The ACLE defines these builtins as svmla[_single]_za32[_f32]_vg1x2, which means
the SVE_ACLE_FUNC macro should test the overloaded forms as
SVE_ACLE_FUNC(svmla,_single,_za32,_f32,_vg1x2)
jayfoad wrote:
Ping!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76149
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -87,6 +85,28 @@ bool isStdVariant(const Type *Type) {
return isStdType(Type, llvm::StringLiteral("variant"));
}
+bool isStdAny(const Type *Type) {
+ return isStdType(Type, llvm::StringLiteral("any"));
+}
+
+bool isVowel(char a) {
+ switch (a) {
+ case 'a':
+ case
@@ -87,6 +85,28 @@ bool isStdVariant(const Type *Type) {
return isStdType(Type, llvm::StringLiteral("variant"));
}
+bool isStdAny(const Type *Type) {
+ return isStdType(Type, llvm::StringLiteral("any"));
+}
+
+bool isVowel(char a) {
+ switch (a) {
+ case 'a':
+ case
Timm =?utf-8?q?B=C3=A4der?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?B=C3=A4der?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
tbaederr wrote:
Ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72892
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+// RUN: %clang %s -std=c++17 -Xclang -verify --analyze \
+// RUN: -Xclang -analyzer-checker=core \
+// RUN: -Xclang -analyzer-checker=debug.ExprInspection \
+// RUN: -Xclang -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.core.StdAny
+
+#include
@@ -87,6 +85,28 @@ bool isStdVariant(const Type *Type) {
return isStdType(Type, llvm::StringLiteral("variant"));
}
+bool isStdAny(const Type *Type) {
+ return isStdType(Type, llvm::StringLiteral("any"));
+}
+
+bool isVowel(char a) {
+ switch (a) {
+ case 'a':
+ case
DonatNagyE wrote:
Thanks for cleaning this up!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76655
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/sdesmalen-arm closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75791
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Sander de Smalen
Date: 2024-01-02T09:43:30Z
New Revision: 5055eeea5205d938320590236eeb782c92e40911
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5055eeea5205d938320590236eeb782c92e40911
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5055eeea5205d938320590236eeb782c92e40911.diff
https://github.com/SunilKuravinakop updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75709
>From fe931d64741f427629407bca3e68a61bec6f2b67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sunil Kuravinakop
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 11:43:35 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Adding parameter to fail clause (i.e. memory
HighCommander4 wrote:
> You mentioned `inconsistencies`, is it inside clangd or in other places that
> surface clang-tidy findings?
I understood it as, the appearance of `modernize-*` clang-tidy diagnostics in
the editor is not consistent with the appearance of other (non-`modernize-*`)
https://github.com/davemgreen edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75440
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -756,6 +756,58 @@ __arm_st64bv0(void *__addr, data512_t __value) {
__builtin_arm_mops_memset_tag(__tagged_address, __value, __size)
#endif
+/* Coprocessor Intrinsics */
+#if defined(__ARM_FEATURE_COPROC)
+
+#if (__ARM_FEATURE_COPROC & 0x1)
+
+#if (__ARM_ARCH != 8)
@@ -836,6 +837,70 @@ void ARMTargetInfo::getTargetDefines(const LangOptions
,
if (Opts.RWPI)
Builder.defineMacro("__ARM_RWPI", "1");
+ // Macros for enabling co-proc intrinsics
+ uint64_t FeatureCoprocBF = 0;
+ switch (ArchKind) {
+ default:
+break;
+ case
@@ -836,6 +837,70 @@ void ARMTargetInfo::getTargetDefines(const LangOptions
,
if (Opts.RWPI)
Builder.defineMacro("__ARM_RWPI", "1");
+ // Macros for enabling co-proc intrinsics
+ uint64_t FeatureCoprocBF = 0;
+ switch (ArchKind) {
+ default:
+break;
+ case
https://github.com/davemgreen commented:
Thanks. This is looking good to me. I just have a few comments about different
architecture revisions.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75440
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
kadircet wrote:
hi @5chmidti and @HighCommander4!
it was deliberate to cover `modernize-` checks as they're pretty similar to
`-wdeprecated` in nature, and they're both explicit, user needs to annotate
code or opt-in for particular clang-tidy checks.
feedback we received in the past was,
FreddyLeaf wrote:
ping for review
@RKSimon are we aligned on the direction to removing knl/knm supports in the
end?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75580
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/kadircet approved this pull request.
thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71605
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -8900,6 +8900,82 @@ SDValue PPCTargetLowering::LowerINT_TO_FP(SDValue Op,
return FP;
}
+SDValue PPCTargetLowering::LowerSET_ROUNDING(SDValue Op,
+ SelectionDAG ) const {
+ SDLoc Dl(Op);
+ MachineFunction =
@@ -8900,6 +8900,82 @@ SDValue PPCTargetLowering::LowerINT_TO_FP(SDValue Op,
return FP;
}
+SDValue PPCTargetLowering::LowerSET_ROUNDING(SDValue Op,
+ SelectionDAG ) const {
+ SDLoc Dl(Op);
+ MachineFunction =
@@ -8900,6 +8900,82 @@ SDValue PPCTargetLowering::LowerINT_TO_FP(SDValue Op,
return FP;
}
+SDValue PPCTargetLowering::LowerSET_ROUNDING(SDValue Op,
+ SelectionDAG ) const {
+ SDLoc Dl(Op);
+ MachineFunction =
@@ -77,4 +77,196 @@ return: ; preds = %entry
ret i32 %retval3
}
-declare i32 @llvm.get.rounding() nounwind
+define void @setrnd_tozero() {
+; PPC32-LABEL: setrnd_tozero:
+; PPC32: # %bb.0: # %entry
+; PPC32-NEXT:mtfsb0 30
+; PPC32-NEXT:mtfsb1
@@ -8900,6 +8900,82 @@ SDValue PPCTargetLowering::LowerINT_TO_FP(SDValue Op,
return FP;
}
+SDValue PPCTargetLowering::LowerSET_ROUNDING(SDValue Op,
+ SelectionDAG ) const {
+ SDLoc Dl(Op);
+ MachineFunction =
https://github.com/chenzheng1030 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67302
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -8900,6 +8900,82 @@ SDValue PPCTargetLowering::LowerINT_TO_FP(SDValue Op,
return FP;
}
+SDValue PPCTargetLowering::LowerSET_ROUNDING(SDValue Op,
+ SelectionDAG ) const {
+ SDLoc Dl(Op);
+ MachineFunction =
https://github.com/chenzheng1030 commented:
Maybe we can do some perf test between this expansion for set rounding mode and
the system library's version for `fesetround()`. On AIX, I saw some
improvements were introduced in the system library's implementation.
201 - 258 of 258 matches
Mail list logo
