https://github.com/Destroyerrrocket updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76825
>From 2afecb35d80df788641c1b45cb74077037ff075f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Pol=20Marcet=20Sard=C3=A0?=
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 16:00:42 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Optimize
Destroyerrrocket wrote:
Squashed, rebased, and updated the commit message to give more information. You
can go ahead and merge!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76825
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff e9af57dfea1637a3872052b317c9fe6c71b8d290
6cc7141f1f182763ccec8a4801d3b866cc839324 --
https://github.com/Destroyerrrocket updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76825
>From bea08b9dd4c9b3663035656de3ee8899538bbfd6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Pol=20Marcet=20Sard=C3=A0?=
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 16:00:42 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Optimize
https://github.com/hokein created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76960
We have a previous fix
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/be861b64d94198230d8f9889b17280e3cd215a0a,
which snapshots all processing files.
It works most of times, the snapshot (InMemoryFileSystem) is
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (Alcaro)
Changes
(Yes, this commit is two years old, I never felt like investigating Phabricator)
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65688.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/docs/Block-ABI-Apple.rst
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75001
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cor3ntin wrote:
@zyn0217 I think the existing release note could mention #71684. LGTM otherwise
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75001
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/sdesmalen-arm approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75958
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zahiraam reopened
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67592
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2585,7 +2585,7 @@ getAMDGPUCodeObjectArgument(const Driver , const
llvm::opt::ArgList ) {
void tools::checkAMDGPUCodeObjectVersion(const Driver ,
const llvm::opt::ArgList ) {
const unsigned MinCodeObjVer = 4;
- const unsigned
Pierre-vh wrote:
Note: testing is a bit light for now, I'd like to add more tests, but I'm not
sure what kind of tests are worth adding.
I could just add a generic target run line wherever gfx9/10/11 run lines are
present, but that seems a bit overkill? I'd need to change half the tests we
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Pierre van Houtryve (Pierre-vh)
Changes
NOTE: This PR is part of a stack, please check #76954 to review the
first commit!
These generic targets include multiple GPUs and will, in the future, provide a
way to
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75798
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-amdgpu
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Pierre van Houtryve (Pierre-vh)
Changes
Introduce Code Object V6 in Clang, LLD, Flang and LLVM. This is the same as V5
except a new "generic version" flag can be present in EFLAGS. This is related
to
https://github.com/Pierre-vh created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76954
Introduce Code Object V6 in Clang, LLD, Flang and LLVM. This is the same as V5
except a new "generic version" flag can be present in EFLAGS. This is related
to new generic targets that'll be added in a
https://github.com/mstorsjo updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76949
From c67187043168b79e57c0e4f3261293d799852e90 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Martin=20Storsj=C3=B6?=
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 15:53:21 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] [MinGW] Don't look for a GCC in path
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: None (ManuelvOK)
Changes
In 2155195, the "system-headers-coverage" option has been added but not used in
all necessary places.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76950.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified)
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
https://github.com/ManuelvOK created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76950
In 2155195, the "system-headers-coverage" option has been added but not used in
all necessary places.
>From 593b9db7dcbb814ddac3c77b462d04400cfa77a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Manuel Kalettka
Date: Wed,
kito-cheng wrote:
@wangpc-pp did you have interested on helping psABI side? it would be great if
you can help since I suspect I don't have enough bandwidth to deal with that
soon.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76777
___
cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 71b3ead870107e39e998f6480e545eb01d9d28be
355e2530e855249adf9657c58d4e1a6727d969bd --
kito-cheng wrote:
Hmmm, RISC-V ISA is growth after
https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/pull/257 again, I
mean...we have zfinx and zdinx, which is also valid combination with
rv32e/rv64e, so we may need to revise ilp32e ABI again on the psABI side, but
my intention is not to
mstorsjo wrote:
CC @mati865 @jeremyd2019 @huangqinjin
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76949
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Martin Storsjö (mstorsjo)
Changes
This fixes uses of the MSYS2 clang64 environment compilers, if another set of
GCC based compilers are available further back in PATH (which may be explicitly
added, or inherited unintentionally
https://github.com/mstorsjo created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76949
This fixes uses of the MSYS2 clang64 environment compilers, if another set of
GCC based compilers are available further back in PATH (which may be explicitly
added, or inherited unintentionally from other
Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sardà?= ,
Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sardà?= ,Pol M
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Endilll wrote:
@Destroyerrrocket We'll merge as soon as you deem it ready and provide commit
description. PR description doesn't seem a good fit for a commit description to
me.
https://github.com/jcsxky closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76493
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Qizhi Hu
Date: 2024-01-04T21:21:53+08:00
New Revision: 4de971c230e8202cfd54d4d6c36719db628d35ce
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4de971c230e8202cfd54d4d6c36719db628d35ce
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4de971c230e8202cfd54d4d6c36719db628d35ce.diff
Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sardà?= ,
Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sardà?= ,Pol M
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/Destroyerrrocket updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76825
>From 1ab4538e194f9a77c500e4a93b1875eb7e76dcf5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
https://github.com/Keenuts approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76749
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
asb wrote:
The conclusion from the previous review was this was OK to merge. I think I
held it up by not responding to a ping (apologies). I've had another scan
through and don't see a problem with merging this and considering it
experimental once Craig's review comments are addressed.
For
FreddyLeaf wrote:
> > @RKSimon @phoebewang Thanks comments! knm has AVX512_VPOPCNTDQ, I guess we
> > also require it work without avx512vl? And we are going to keep
> > -march/mtune/mcpu support for knl/knm, but removing some specific ISA's
> > intrinsic and lowering supports? Did I get your
https://github.com/FreddyLeaf edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75580
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/FreddyLeaf updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75580
>From e16afbdc9f0c04bad0e8f80f90c0eb26c13d3326 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Freddy Ye
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 16:50:23 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [X86] Emit Warnings for frontend options to enable
knl/knm.
Author: Martin Storsjö
Date: 2024-01-04T15:01:17+02:00
New Revision: 71b3ead870107e39e998f6480e545eb01d9d28be
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/71b3ead870107e39e998f6480e545eb01d9d28be
DIFF:
zyn0217 wrote:
It is interesting to note that, if we exchange the position of two template
parameters, i.e.
```cpp
template
concept C = false;
template struct S {};
template typename T, unsigned N> // The
template-template parameter now precedes the NTTP
int wow(T ts);
int main() {
=?utf-8?b?5b6Q5oyB5oGS?= Xu Chiheng,=?utf-8?b?5b6Q5oyB5oGS?= Xu Chiheng
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: 徐持恒 Xu Chiheng (xu-chiheng)
Changes
Enable TLS, and set VaListKind to CharPtrBuiltinVaList.
This fix bootstrap failure on Cygwin.
---
Full
=?utf-8?b?5b6Q5oyB5oGS?= Xu Chiheng,=?utf-8?b?5b6Q5oyB5oGS?= Xu Chiheng
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can
https://github.com/xu-chiheng created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76943
Enable TLS, and set VaListKind to CharPtrBuiltinVaList.
This fix bootstrap failure on Cygwin.
From 35cb22083fc0f842e873c99518a58d673bbcb1ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
https://github.com/bwendling updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76882
>From ca7a96a40952fe94b916dacc52f07aa90bbdb1e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bill Wendling
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 13:22:37 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [builtin_object_size] Use classes instead of std::pair
RKSimon wrote:
> @RKSimon @phoebewang Thanks comments! knm has AVX512_VPOPCNTDQ, I guess we
> also require it work without avx512vl? And we are going to keep
> -march/mtune/mcpu support for knl/knm, but removing some specific ISA's
> intrinsic and lowering supports? Did I get your point
@@ -6213,26 +6226,35 @@ StmtResult Sema::ActOnOpenMPExecutableDirective(
OpenMPDirectiveKind PrevMappedDirective) {
StmtResult Res = StmtError();
OpenMPBindClauseKind BindKind = OMPC_BIND_unknown;
+ llvm::SmallVector ClausesWithoutBind;
+ bool UseClausesWithoutBind =
@@ -11335,6 +11335,7 @@ class Sema final {
/// on the parameter of the bind clause. In the methods for the
/// mapped directives, check the parameters of the lastprivate clause.
bool checkLastPrivateForMappedDirectives(ArrayRef Clauses);
+
alexey-bataev
@@ -5072,6 +5072,18 @@ static bool checkNestingOfRegions(Sema , const
DSAStackTy *Stack,
CurrentRegion != OMPD_cancellation_point &&
CurrentRegion != OMPD_cancel && CurrentRegion != OMPD_scan)
return false;
+// Checks needed for mapping "loop"
https://github.com/kadircet closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76826
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: kadir çetinkaya
Date: 2024-01-04T12:57:42+01:00
New Revision: 2336f792bc5a1d9195c1bd995b6040c13e73d4e7
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2336f792bc5a1d9195c1bd995b6040c13e73d4e7
DIFF:
kadircet wrote:
oh sorry, this should ofc work with include-cleaner fixes, as we actually
provide these as edits, instead of commands, as we do with our usual tweaks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76826
___
cfe-commits mailing list
kadircet wrote:
> This change makes sense for removing all unused includes (as all these unused
> includes are visible in the editor). For missing includes, they are less
> obvious, but it is probably fine.
The rationale for missing includes was the same, when things go wrong it's
usually
Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sardà?= ,
Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sardà?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/Destroyerrrocket updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76825
>From 1ab4538e194f9a77c500e4a93b1875eb7e76dcf5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Pol=20Marcet=20Sard=C3=A0?=
mordante wrote:
> > @ilya-biryukov this is the new attempt to land this patch, the version you
> > committed breaks the libc++ CI. I'll try to fix it this week.
>
> Wow, I didn't expect that. Is libc++ ok with disabling this test until the
> nightly build catches up? (The PR is in the Draft
Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sardà?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Destroyerrrocket wrote:
Thank you! I truly appreciate the congrats! :D
@Endilll I don't have write access (I think? I'm new here :) ), I think one of
you will have to make the merge (not used to github, at work I use bitbucket, I
might
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Luke Lau (lukel97)
Changes
toFeatures and toFeatureVector both output a list of target feature flags, just
with a slightly different interface. toFeatures keeps any unsupported
extensions, and also provides a way to append negative
https://github.com/lukel97 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76942
toFeatures and toFeatureVector both output a list of target feature flags, just
with a slightly different interface. toFeatures keeps any unsupported
extensions, and also provides a way to append negative
Thorsten =?utf-8?q?Sch=C3=BCtt?= ,
Thorsten =?utf-8?q?Sch=C3=BCtt?= ,
Thorsten =?utf-8?q?Sch=C3=BCtt?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/arsenm approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76763
___
cfe-commits
Thorsten =?utf-8?q?Schütt?= ,
Thorsten =?utf-8?q?Schütt?= ,
Thorsten =?utf-8?q?Schütt?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -6548,6 +6534,54 @@ bool CombinerHelper::tryFoldBoolSelectToLogic(GSelect
*Select,
return false;
}
+bool CombinerHelper::tryFoldSelectOfBinOps(GSelect
@@ -237,18 +236,6 @@ removeAllUnusedIncludes(llvm::ArrayRef
UnusedIncludes) {
Diag.Fixes.front().Edits.begin(),
Diag.Fixes.front().Edits.end());
}
-
- // TODO(hokein): emit a suitable text for the label.
-
https://github.com/kadircet updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76826
From 5e9a851584dcfd730fda7d85b54101ebea89f8a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kadir Cetinkaya
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 16:06:13 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clangd] Dont require confirmation for include-cleaner
@@ -30113,32 +30120,40 @@ TargetLoweringBase::AtomicExpansionKind
X86TargetLowering::shouldExpandAtomicStoreInIR(StoreInst *SI) const {
Type *MemType = SI->getValueOperand()->getType();
- bool NoImplicitFloatOps =
-
Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sard=C3=A0?= ,
Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sard=C3=A0?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Destroyerrrocket wrote:
(sorry about the typo!)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76615
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sardà?= ,
Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sardà?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/Destroyerrrocket updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76615
>From cba67a73ea1e59eb8eeb4e702d77f329028f4c22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Pol=20Marcet=20Sard=C3=A0?=
@@ -1,18 +1,12 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -ftemplate-backtrace-limit=2 %s
-//
-// FIXME: Disable this test when Clang was built with ASan, because ASan
-// increases our per-frame stack usage enough that this test no longer fits
-// within our normal stack space
Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sardà?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
RKSimon wrote:
Please can you rename constat_builtins_vector.cpp ->
constant_builtins_vector.cpp
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76615
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/SunilKuravinakop edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76938
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ilya-biryukov wrote:
I'm Sam's colleague and wanted to mention that Sam won't be available until
January 15.
It probably does not make much sense for someone else to take over at this
point as the change is large and waiting for Sam is more efficient than ramping
up someone else at this
https://github.com/SunilKuravinakop edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76938
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/SunilKuravinakop edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76938
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ilya-biryukov closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74490
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Ilya Biryukov
Date: 2024-01-04T11:57:53+01:00
New Revision: f5efa74961560070a1e6f127214bcf6b570fef98
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f5efa74961560070a1e6f127214bcf6b570fef98
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f5efa74961560070a1e6f127214bcf6b570fef98.diff
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76915
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kleinesfilmroellchen updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67749
From 8a2b22e69f82e3f4caa271b57b998d1c03b21d39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?kleines=20Filmr=C3=B6llchen?=
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 11:53:23 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clangd] Allow specifying
kleinesfilmroellchen wrote:
> > What is the relationship between this patch, and clangd 17's ["missing
> > include"
> > warning](https://clangd.llvm.org/guides/include-cleaner#missing-include-warning)?
> > Does the quick-fix for the "missing include" warning also respect these
> > config
RoboTux wrote:
Thanks for fixing the unused variable @DamonFool , I was about to revert and
push a new patch.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74588
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sard=C3=A0?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -196,8 +217,20 @@ void ClangASTNodesEmitter::run(raw_ostream ) {
}
void clang::EmitClangASTNodes(RecordKeeper , raw_ostream ,
- const std::string , const std::string ) {
-
Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sard=C3=A0?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
LGTM.
1% is a very consequential improvement, congrats!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76825
___
cfe-commits mailing list
Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sardà?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/cor3ntin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76825
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
ilya-biryukov wrote:
> @ilya-biryukov this is the new attempt to land this patch, the version you
> committed breaks the libc++ CI. I'll try to fix it this week.
Wow, I didn't expect that. Is libc++ ok with disabling this test until the
nightly build catches up? (The PR is in the Draft state,
heiher wrote:
@erichkeane gentle ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72078
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ void test_svmls_single2_f64(uint32_t slice_base,
svfloat64x2_t zn, svfloat64_t z
// CPP-CHECK-NEXT:ret void
//
void test_svmls_single4_f64(uint32_t slice_base, svfloat64x4_t zn, svfloat64_t
zm) __arm_streaming __arm_shared_za {
-
https://github.com/kmclaughlin-arm edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76711
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kmclaughlin-arm commented:
Thanks for fixing these tests @MDevereau!
There are also some tests in acle_sme2_mlal.c, acle_sme2_mlall.c &
acle_sme2_mlsl.c which have a similar issue, could you please update them in
this patch too?
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (SunilKuravinakop)
Changes
Changes uploaded to the phabricator on Dec 16th are lost because the
phabricator is down. Hence re-uploading it to the github.com.
Changes to be committed:
modified:
https://github.com/SunilKuravinakop created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76938
Changes uploaded to the phabricator on Dec 16th are lost because the
phabricator is down. Hence re-uploading it to the github.com.
Changes to be committed:
modified:
@@ -640,3 +640,36 @@ namespace PR46637 {
template struct Y { T x; };
Y auto> y; // expected-error {{'auto' not allowed in template
argument}}
}
+
+namespace GH71015 {
+
+// Check that there is no error in case a templated function is recursive and
+// has a placeholder
Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sardà?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/Destroyerrrocket updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76615
>From cba67a73ea1e59eb8eeb4e702d77f329028f4c22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Pol=20Marcet=20Sard=C3=A0?=
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2023
https://github.com/Fznamznon updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75456
>From 0e190f131862dd8f4b07891c3ee712a0a163f936 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Podchishchaeva, Mariya"
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 01:33:17 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Accept recursive non-dependent calls to
https://github.com/RoboTux closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74588
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> > Like I said in the commit message, this patch itself doesn't involve
> > anything relevant to user interfaces. I left it to the latter patches.
>
> Are you in a position to post the next patch (at least as a draft)? That
> would help me see the direction.
I post it here
Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sard=C3=A0?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -70,8 +71,15 @@ class ClangASTNodesEmitter {
std::pair EmitNode(raw_ostream& OS, ASTNode Base);
public:
explicit ClangASTNodesEmitter(RecordKeeper , const std::string ,
-const
Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sard=C3=A0?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/Endilll approved this pull request.
LGTM, but you should wait for more approvals before merging.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76825
___
cfe-commits mailing
Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sardà?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -95,8 +103,23 @@ std::pair
ClangASTNodesEmitter::EmitNode(raw_ostream ,
if (!Base.isAbstract())
First = Last = Base;
+ auto comp = [this](ASTNode LHS, ASTNode RHS) {
+auto LHSPriorized =
Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sardà?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76825
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
Luhaocong wrote:
Thanks for everyone's review. Do you have any other suggestions for this
change, and can this pull request be accepted ?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74439
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -1698,8 +1698,6 @@ FormatStyle getGoogleStyle(FormatStyle::LanguageKind
Language) {
/*BasedOnStyle=*/"google",
},
};
- GoogleStyle.AttributeMacros.push_back("GUARDED_BY");
ilya-biryukov wrote:
They are attribute macros indeed, the
Author: Mitch Phillips
Date: 2024-01-04T10:47:51+01:00
New Revision: 26993f61673e3d9b29785f9baa5bac50c09f8bcf
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/26993f61673e3d9b29785f9baa5bac50c09f8bcf
DIFF:
https://github.com/arsenm approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74588
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/SamTebbs33 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75958
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1109,10 +1109,10 @@ def SVPFALSE : SInst<"svpfalse[_b]", "Pv", "",
MergeNone, "", [IsOverloadNone, I
def SVPTRUE_PAT : SInst<"svptrue_pat_{d}", "PI", "PcPsPiPl", MergeNone,
"aarch64_sve_ptrue", [IsStreamingCompatible]>;
def SVPTRUE : SInst<"svptrue_{d}", "Pv",
@@ -10093,11 +10090,11 @@ TEST_F(FormatTest, ReturnTypeBreakingStyle) {
getGoogleStyleWithColumns(40));
verifyFormat("Tttt ppp\n"
"ABSL_GUARDED_BY(mutex1)\n"
- "ABSL_GUARDED_BY(mutex2);",
+
owenca wrote:
Actually, it's commit 42ec976184ac. Please see
[here](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76733#issuecomment-1876707005).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76327
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
401 - 500 of 534 matches
Mail list logo
