@@ -168,20 +174,48 @@ static Value *appendString(IRBuilder<> &Builder, Value
*Desc, Value *Arg,
return callAppendStringN(Builder, Desc, Arg, Length, IsLast);
}
+static Value *appendVectorArg(IRBuilder<> &Builder, Value *Desc, Value *Arg,
+ bool
@@ -170,20 +173,49 @@ static Value *appendString(IRBuilder<> &Builder, Value
*Desc, Value *Arg,
return callAppendStringN(Builder, Desc, Arg, Length, IsLast);
}
+static Value *appendVectorArg(IRBuilder<> &Builder, Value *Desc, Value *Arg,
+ bool
@@ -4742,6 +4742,16 @@ void Clang::ConstructJob(Compilation &C, const JobAction
&JA,
Args.ClaimAllArgs(options::OPT_gen_cdb_fragment_path);
}
+ if (TC.getTriple().isAMDGPU() && types::isOpenCL(Input.getType())) {
+if (Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_mprintf_kind_EQ))
@@ -26,28 +26,34 @@ using namespace llvm;
#define DEBUG_TYPE "amdgpu-emit-printf"
-static Value *fitArgInto64Bits(IRBuilder<> &Builder, Value *Arg) {
+static Value *fitArgInto64Bits(IRBuilder<> &Builder, Value *Arg,
+ bool IsBuffered) {
+ const
https://github.com/ssahasra requested changes to this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72556
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ssahasra edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72556
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> > > > I tried applying this patch to ROOT/Cling and it fails to build because
> > > > something is of the opinion that `std::is_integral::value` is not
> > > > true. I don't have time right now to investigate further, but since
> > > > this is the only change I did it is hi
https://github.com/PiotrZSL approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78320
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cor3ntin wrote:
@AaronBallman @erichkeane ping :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77092
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -std=c++20 -verify %s
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+
+auto ICE = [](auto a) { return [=]() { return 1; }; };
cor3ntin wrote:
Can you reference the issue number in the test?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pul
cor3ntin wrote:
Thanks for this patch.
Can you add a release note?
Does this fix any of these issues ? (if so, can you add test for them?
#76481
#70064
#63271
#61939
#45441
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78896
___
cfe-commits mailing lis
hahnjo wrote:
> > > I tried applying this patch to ROOT/Cling and it fails to build because
> > > something is of the opinion that `std::is_integral::value` is not
> > > true. I don't have time right now to investigate further, but since this
> > > is the only change I did it is highly likely
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -std=c++20 -verify %s
cor3ntin wrote:
`-fsyntax-only` is suspicious, i would prefer a CodeGenTest that checks the
mangle name
Maybe moving the test to `test/CodeGenCXX/mangle-lambdas.cpp ` (or one of the
other s
https://github.com/PiotrZSL updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76365
>From 5ece73a5b14e86172b900f4ae9d63d8fa1590d4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Piotr Zegar
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2023 16:18:45 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [clang-tidy] Add bugprone-chained-comparison check
Check that
https://github.com/PiotrZSL updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71683
>From 5c6db0ec4850bed27f94839d0f018d66fa1c57f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Piotr Zegar
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 13:31:28 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] Add AllowImplicitlyDeletedCopyOrMove option to
cppcor
HighCommander4 wrote:
> @HighCommander4 @sam-mccall do you have any capacity to review this change?
I'm happy to try and help, but I haven't really been involved in the
development of the include-cleaner component, and based on the findings in my
previous comment, the patch would benefit from
@@ -1338,6 +1339,34 @@ class VPWidenCastRecipe : public VPRecipeWithIRFlags {
Type *getResultType() const { return ResultTy; }
};
+/// VPScalarCastRecipe is a recipe o create scalar cast instructions.
+class VPScalarCastRecipe : public VPRecipeBase, public VPValue {
+ /// C
@@ -504,6 +504,15 @@ static VPValue *createScalarIVSteps(VPlan &Plan, const
InductionDescriptor &ID,
HeaderVPBB->insert(BaseIV->getDefiningRecipe(), IP);
}
+ VPTypeAnalysis TypeInfo(SE.getContext());
+ if (TypeInfo.inferScalarType(BaseIV) != TypeInfo.inferScalarType(S
@@ -1117,13 +1119,7 @@ void VPScalarIVStepsRecipe::execute(VPTransformState
&State) {
// Ensure step has the same type as that of scalar IV.
Type *BaseIVTy = BaseIV->getType()->getScalarType();
- if (BaseIVTy != Step->getType()) {
-// TODO: Also use VPDerivedIVRecipe
@@ -1338,6 +1339,34 @@ class VPWidenCastRecipe : public VPRecipeWithIRFlags {
Type *getResultType() const { return ResultTy; }
};
+/// VPScalarCastRecipe is a recipe o create scalar cast instructions.
ayalz wrote:
```suggestion
/// VPScalarCastRecipe is a r
@@ -1469,6 +1465,47 @@ void VPReplicateRecipe::print(raw_ostream &O, const
Twine &Indent,
}
#endif
+Value *VPScalarCastRecipe ::generate(VPTransformState &State, unsigned Part) {
+ assert(vputils::onlyFirstLaneUsed(this) &&
+ "Codegen only implemented for first lane
@@ -362,6 +362,7 @@ class VPDef {
// START: Phi-like recipes. Need to be kept together.
VPBlendSC,
VPPredInstPHISC,
+VPScalarCastSC,
ayalz wrote:
Placed inside Phi-like recipes interval?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78113
@@ -1469,6 +1465,47 @@ void VPReplicateRecipe::print(raw_ostream &O, const
Twine &Indent,
}
#endif
+Value *VPScalarCastRecipe ::generate(VPTransformState &State, unsigned Part) {
+ assert(vputils::onlyFirstLaneUsed(this) &&
+ "Codegen only implemented for first lane
@@ -1338,6 +1339,34 @@ class VPWidenCastRecipe : public VPRecipeWithIRFlags {
Type *getResultType() const { return ResultTy; }
};
+/// VPScalarCastRecipe is a recipe o create scalar cast instructions.
+class VPScalarCastRecipe : public VPRecipeBase, public VPValue {
@@ -1338,6 +1339,34 @@ class VPWidenCastRecipe : public VPRecipeWithIRFlags {
Type *getResultType() const { return ResultTy; }
};
+/// VPScalarCastRecipe is a recipe o create scalar cast instructions.
+class VPScalarCastRecipe : public VPRecipeBase, public VPValue {
+ /// C
@@ -1469,6 +1465,47 @@ void VPReplicateRecipe::print(raw_ostream &O, const
Twine &Indent,
}
#endif
+Value *VPScalarCastRecipe ::generate(VPTransformState &State, unsigned Part) {
+ assert(vputils::onlyFirstLaneUsed(this) &&
+ "Codegen only implemented for first lane
@@ -1338,6 +1339,34 @@ class VPWidenCastRecipe : public VPRecipeWithIRFlags {
Type *getResultType() const { return ResultTy; }
};
+/// VPScalarCastRecipe is a recipe o create scalar cast instructions.
+class VPScalarCastRecipe : public VPRecipeBase, public VPValue {
+ /// C
@@ -164,6 +164,8 @@ bool VPRecipeBase::mayHaveSideEffects() const {
auto *R = cast(this);
return R->getUnderlyingInstr()->mayHaveSideEffects();
}
+ case VPScalarCastSC:
+return false;
ayalz wrote:
nit: join the above group known to return false
@@ -230,7 +230,11 @@ Type *VPTypeAnalysis::inferScalarType(const VPValue *V) {
return V->getUnderlyingValue()->getType();
})
.Case(
- [](const VPWidenCastRecipe *R) { return R->getResultType(); });
+ [](const VPWidenCast
@@ -1338,6 +1339,34 @@ class VPWidenCastRecipe : public VPRecipeWithIRFlags {
Type *getResultType() const { return ResultTy; }
};
+/// VPScalarCastRecipe is a recipe o create scalar cast instructions.
+class VPScalarCastRecipe : public VPRecipeBase, public VPValue {
+ /// C
HighCommander4 wrote:
> > > What is the relationship between this patch, and clangd 17's ["missing
> > > include"
> > > warning](https://clangd.llvm.org/guides/include-cleaner#missing-include-warning)?
> > > Does the quick-fix for the "missing include" warning also respect these
> > > config
dyung wrote:
@aaupov I believe this change is somehow causing cmake failures on several bots
I oversee, although I cannot explain why it passed when building your commit.
For example:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/139/builds/57628
```
CMake Error at
/home/buildbot/buildbot-root/llv
minglotus-6 wrote:
I created a
[branch](https://github.com/minglotus-6/llvm-project/tree/type_profile) and
submitted the end-to-end implementation there. Besides (a [squashed
version](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/de71eacf04a236031be6f1b53168f8f566244297)
of) this pull request,
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
LGTM with a few nits. Can you double check modules.json is inside `lib/`
(`usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu{{/|\\}}modules.json`) instead of some directory
under `include`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76451
__
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2024-01-22T14:24:33+08:00
New Revision: a31a60074717fc40887cfe132b77eec93bedd307
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a31a60074717fc40887cfe132b77eec93bedd307
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a31a60074717fc40887cfe132b77eec93bedd307.diff
LO
@@ -6135,6 +6141,45 @@ std::string Driver::GetProgramPath(StringRef Name, const
ToolChain &TC) const {
return std::string(Name);
}
+std::string Driver::GetStdModuleManifestPath(const Compilation &C,
+ const ToolChain &TC) const {
@@ -602,6 +602,16 @@ class Driver {
// FIXME: This should be in CompilationInfo.
std::string GetProgramPath(StringRef Name, const ToolChain &TC) const;
+ /// GetModuleManifestPath - Lookup the name of the Standard library manifest.
+ ///
+ /// \param C - The compilation
https://github.com/chenshanzhi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78716
>From dcdf4a5825a402ab1392f61354c604a9cf965bdd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shanzhi Chen
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 11:40:09 +
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang][AST] Fix a crash on attaching doc comments
This crash
https://github.com/aaupov closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69133
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Amir Ayupov
Date: 2024-01-21T22:03:39-08:00
New Revision: 745883bba69007f1d2c5135f3d5b0f1efcfc82cd
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/745883bba69007f1d2c5135f3d5b0f1efcfc82cd
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/745883bba69007f1d2c5135f3d5b0f1efcfc82cd.diff
L
owenca wrote:
> @mydeveloperday, do you have an opinion on this pull request? It addresses
> #78010 with minimal changes, or are you interested in exploring other
> possibilities?
It's weird to add such a top-level option to fix a bug and keep the current
behavior. See
https://github.com/llv
@@ -154,6 +154,46 @@ if( ${LLVM_PACKAGE_VERSION} VERSION_GREATER "6.99.99" )
set( tahiti_aliases ${tahiti_aliases} gfx904 gfx906 )
endif()
+# Support for gfx909, gfx1010, gfx1011 and gfx1012 was added in LLVM 10
(r345120)
+if( ${LLVM_PACKAGE_VERSION} VERSION_GREATER "9
https://github.com/zboszor updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78884
From 26e8eaaa9b0be1fdc146b5b4e8d285a2e8a2edbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Zolt=C3=A1n=20B=C3=B6sz=C3=B6rm=C3=A9nyi?=
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 07:59:02 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] libclc: add some missi
linux4life798 wrote:
Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77269
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Craig Topper
Date: 2024-01-21T21:18:43-08:00
New Revision: 25063bedb596943e546994a45710c79fdd6539e8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/25063bedb596943e546994a45710c79fdd6539e8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/25063bedb596943e546994a45710c79fdd6539e8.diff
Author: Craig Topper
Date: 2024-01-21T21:18:43-08:00
New Revision: 5ffe777c4acd1051c4cebc8464c7e1ae5ca2f689
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5ffe777c4acd1051c4cebc8464c7e1ae5ca2f689
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5ffe777c4acd1051c4cebc8464c7e1ae5ca2f689.diff
https://github.com/cor3ntin commented:
Separate default-to-error warning sounds like the right approach given the
fallout.
We will need a way to identify that the shadowing declaration is the
declaration the template parameter is attached to, so I suspect that change
isn't trivial.
I'll reve
=?utf-8?b?Wm9sdMOhbiBCw7ZzesO2cm3DqW55aQ=?Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -154,6 +154,46 @@ if( ${LLVM_PACKAGE_VERSION} VERSION_GREATER "6.99.99" )
set( tahiti_aliases ${tahiti_aliases} gfx904 gfx906 )
endif()
+# Support for gfx909, gfx1010, gfx1011 and gfx1012 was added
=?utf-8?b?Wm9sdMOhbiBCw7ZzesO2cm3DqW55aQ=?Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -154,6 +154,46 @@ if( ${LLVM_PACKAGE_VERSION} VERSION_GREATER "6.99.99" )
set( tahiti_aliases ${tahiti_aliases} gfx904 gfx906 )
endif()
+# Support for gfx909, gfx1010, gfx1011 and gfx1012 was added
=?utf-8?b?Wm9sdMOhbiBCw7ZzesO2cm3DqW55aQ=?Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/arsenm edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78884
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
=?utf-8?b?Wm9sdMOhbiBCw7ZzesO2cm3DqW55aQ==?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/arsenm approved this pull request.
can probably drop all the versioning handling here
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78884
___
cfe-commits mailing li
https://github.com/Zingam closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77967
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Ben Shi (benshi001)
Changes
These functions always return -1 and set 'errno'.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78930.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Stat
https://github.com/benshi001 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78930
These functions always return -1 and set 'errno'.
>From 74a43113ee4152eb0cb6aaeb4fbc917bcf0abcf8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Shi
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 12:42:43 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [clang[analyzer] I
@@ -1071,6 +1071,16 @@ TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest,
UnderstandsRequiresClausesAndConcepts) {
"concept C = (!Foo) && Bar;");
ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 19u) << Tokens;
EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[15], tok::ampamp, TT_BinaryOperator);
+
+ Tokens = annotate("void f()
@@ -1071,6 +1071,37 @@ TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest,
UnderstandsRequiresClausesAndConcepts) {
"concept C = (!Foo) && Bar;");
ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 19u) << Tokens;
EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[15], tok::ampamp, TT_BinaryOperator);
+
+ Tokens = annotate("void f()
@@ -1071,6 +1071,16 @@ TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest,
UnderstandsRequiresClausesAndConcepts) {
"concept C = (!Foo) && Bar;");
owenca wrote:
+1. You don't even need to create a pull request for this kind of NFC changes.
https://github.com/llvm/l
https://github.com/KanRobert closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78901
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Shengchen Kan
Date: 2024-01-22T12:30:25+08:00
New Revision: 85337df9e36a10941faa14472b1a4ea0607bfced
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/85337df9e36a10941faa14472b1a4ea0607bfced
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/85337df9e36a10941faa14472b1a4ea0607bfced.diff
KanRobert wrote:
Thanks! @phoebewang
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78901
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
petrhosek wrote:
Please ignore 04c85587596ab10d885a957a00c8fa22740f15c1 which addresses a
different issue, this is still broken in tip-of-tree.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76449
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
htt
chenshanzhi wrote:
@gribozavr
Thanks for your reply! I'm really glad that I can get the explanation about the
original aim of the relevant code from you!
I do have considered merging the two loops as you recommended when I tried to
solve the crash. But I got confused when I compared the impl
https://github.com/petrhosek approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69133
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/petrhosek approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78869
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/yuxuanchen1997 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78801
>From 2f95a8ff5f79221c568d9793fcbbd664a22e23df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yuxuan Chen
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 13:42:46 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Refactor and fix Lambda prototype instantiation when it's
a
https://github.com/yuxuanchen1997 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78803
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Yuxuan Chen
Date: 2024-01-21T19:31:40-08:00
New Revision: 71dbefa446e60dcce86fc3f8531e50b1d12ce31f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/71dbefa446e60dcce86fc3f8531e50b1d12ce31f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/71dbefa446e60dcce86fc3f8531e50b1d12ce31f.diff
L
petrhosek wrote:
The `llvm-libc++-static-clangcl.cfg.in ::
std/utilities/format/format.arguments/format.arg/visit.return_type.pass.cpp` is
failing on Windows with the following error:
```
Exit Code: 1
Command Output (stdout):
--
# COMPILED WITH
C:/b/s/w/ir/x/w/llvm_build/./bin/clang-cl.exe
C:
https://github.com/phoebewang approved this pull request.
LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78901
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
HighCommander4 wrote:
A few additional notes:
* I chose the value `1 << 20` for `MaxLinesToProcess` empirically to get
`guessLanguage()` to return in about 1 second on my
(average-for-a-developer-machine) hardware. I don't feel strongly about the
value and I'm happy to go with a different on
owenca wrote:
> > It seems adding a boolean sub-option that targets double pairs of
> > parentheses as I suggested before is feasible although a better name than
> > `ConsecutiveParentheses` may be needed.
>
> I'm fine to fix but request a concrete suggestion or proposal before I spend
> much
https://github.com/KanRobert edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78901
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -803,10 +803,10 @@
// RUN: %clang -target x86_64-unknown-unknown -march=x86-64 -mapx-features=ndd
-x c -E -dM -o - %s | FileCheck --check-prefix=NDD %s
// RUN: %clang -target x86_64-unknown-unknown -march=x86-64
-mapx-features=ccmp -x c -E -dM -o - %s | FileCheck --check-pr
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format
Author: Nathan Ridge (HighCommander4)
Changes
guessLanguage() uses UnwrappedLineParser to process different preprocessor
variants of a file. For large files with many preprocessor branches, the number
of variants can be very large and the
https://github.com/HighCommander4 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78925
guessLanguage() uses UnwrappedLineParser to process different preprocessor
variants of a file. For large files with many preprocessor branches, the number
of variants can be very large and the operation c
@@ -803,10 +803,10 @@
// RUN: %clang -target x86_64-unknown-unknown -march=x86-64 -mapx-features=ndd
-x c -E -dM -o - %s | FileCheck --check-prefix=NDD %s
// RUN: %clang -target x86_64-unknown-unknown -march=x86-64
-mapx-features=ccmp -x c -E -dM -o - %s | FileCheck --check-pr
https://github.com/yuxuanchen1997 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78803
>From 6841b80f5baf33ebdf4a9203c9079bffac1d589c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yuxuan Chen
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 14:41:45 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Drop workaround for old gcc versions
---
clang/lib/Sema/Tr
https://github.com/owenca approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77699
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Yunzezhu94 wrote:
Gentle Ping.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77075
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/SuperSodaSea updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68485
>From 03276260c48d9cafb2a0d80825156e77cdf02eba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: SuperSodaSea
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 21:05:17 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/15] [clang] static operators should evaluate object
argumen
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> > I tried applying this patch to ROOT/Cling and it fails to build because
> > something is of the opinion that `std::is_integral::value` is not
> > true. I don't have time right now to investigate further, but since this is
> > the only change I did it is highly likely that
@@ -803,10 +803,10 @@
// RUN: %clang -target x86_64-unknown-unknown -march=x86-64 -mapx-features=ndd
-x c -E -dM -o - %s | FileCheck --check-prefix=NDD %s
// RUN: %clang -target x86_64-unknown-unknown -march=x86-64
-mapx-features=ccmp -x c -E -dM -o - %s | FileCheck --check-pr
@@ -803,10 +803,10 @@
// RUN: %clang -target x86_64-unknown-unknown -march=x86-64 -mapx-features=ndd
-x c -E -dM -o - %s | FileCheck --check-prefix=NDD %s
// RUN: %clang -target x86_64-unknown-unknown -march=x86-64
-mapx-features=ccmp -x c -E -dM -o - %s | FileCheck --check-pr
@@ -3924,6 +3925,154 @@ class ASTDeclContextNameLookupTrait {
} // namespace
+namespace {
+class SpecializationsLookupTrait {
+ ASTWriter &Writer;
+ llvm::SmallVector DeclIDs;
+
+public:
+ using key_type = unsigned;
+ using key_type_ref = key_type;
+
+ /// A start and en
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s readability-use-std-min-max %t
+
+#define MY_MACRO_MIN(a, b) ((a) < (b) ? (a) : (b))
+
+constexpr int myConstexprMin(int a, int b) {
+ return a < b ? a : b;
+}
+
+constexpr int myConstexprMax(int a, int b) {
+ return a > b ? a : b;
https://github.com/rymiel approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78921
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
gedare wrote:
> > > Would `__attribute__((noreturn))`, `if ((i = j))`, `decltype((x))`, and
> > > `while (((i + 1) * j - 2) * k > 3)` be formatted as `__attribute__((
> > > noreturn ))`, `if (( i = j ))`, `decltype(( x ))`, and `while ( ( ( i + 1
> > > ) * j - 2 ) * k > 3 )`, respectively?
> >
https://github.com/heiher closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78664
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: hev
Date: 2024-01-22T09:35:21+08:00
New Revision: 890acf8d382d70c07a589d5ab9b83e64841b9e96
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/890acf8d382d70c07a589d5ab9b83e64841b9e96
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/890acf8d382d70c07a589d5ab9b83e64841b9e96.diff
LOG: [doc
alexfh wrote:
We've got a huge amount of fallout from this change too. The cleanup would
require a lot of work. This compiler error (though useful) definitely needs to
be a diagnostic with a separate disable flag with at least one release of grace
period. For now, I suggest to revert the chang
https://github.com/benshi001 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78886
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Ben Shi
Date: 2024-01-22T09:31:32+08:00
New Revision: 1d9a65b220a92b59b0556ba8b3195b5346e71170
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1d9a65b220a92b59b0556ba8b3195b5346e71170
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1d9a65b220a92b59b0556ba8b3195b5346e71170.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/gedare updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77699
>From ff055d9c064d1fb359d59eeb47cb5f8c6c422bec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gedare Bloom
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 17:28:47 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Fix formatting of if statements with BlockIndent
A bug with Blo
@@ -29,6 +29,12 @@ namespace llvm {
class StringRef;
class SparcSubtarget : public SparcGenSubtargetInfo {
+ // Reserve*Register[i] - *#i is not available as a general purpose register.
+ BitVector ReserveGRegister;
koachan wrote:
Yeah, something like that
@@ -98,9 +96,34 @@ BitVector SparcRegisterInfo::getReservedRegs(const
MachineFunction &MF) const {
for (unsigned n = 0; n < 31; n++)
Reserved.set(SP::ASR1 + n);
+ for (size_t i = 0; i < SP::IntRegsRegClass.getNumRegs() / 4; ++i) {
+// Mark both single register and
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format
Author: Owen Pan (owenca)
Changes
Fixes #76991.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78921.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Format/ContinuationIndenter.cpp (+2-1)
- (modified) clang/lib/Format/Whitespace
https://github.com/owenca created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78921
Fixes #76991.
>From bc3f566b7c512434179241796a2d7d4ac3e7b381 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Pan
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 17:14:53 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format] Fix a bug in ContinuationIndenter
Fixes
jimmy-zx wrote:
@linux4life798 Thanks for pointing out! I've updated the naming to conform
snake_case.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77269
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi
https://github.com/jimmy-zx updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77269
>From a5379ca876d9531d48b37b9ad9c864db98c7dcd6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jimmy Z <51149050+jimmy...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 04:36:27 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [libclang/python] Expos
https://github.com/koachan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74927
>From fd0bae41e2c3ed791a6a73affc9e1709e21ff880 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Koakuma
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 08:08:29 +0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [SPARC] Support reserving arbitrary general purpose
registers
Thi
1 - 100 of 345 matches
Mail list logo
