https://github.com/alanzhao1 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79225
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Alan Zhao
Date: 2024-01-23T15:42:49-08:00
New Revision: 25e1916d88ebeef786956b678a4eb9a757e219d9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/25e1916d88ebeef786956b678a4eb9a757e219d9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/25e1916d88ebeef786956b678a4eb9a757e219d9.diff
@@ -281,23 +279,19 @@ entry:
define void @store_trunc_add_from_64bits(ptr %src, ptr %dst) {
; CHECK-LABEL: store_trunc_add_from_64bits:
; CHECK: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
-; CHECK-NEXT:sub sp, sp, #16
-; CHECK-NEXT:.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
; CHECK-NEXT:ldr s0, [x0]
;
@@ -21471,6 +21471,57 @@ bool isHalvingTruncateOfLegalScalableType(EVT SrcVT,
EVT DstVT) {
(SrcVT == MVT::nxv2i64 && DstVT == MVT::nxv2i32);
}
+// Combine store (trunc X to <3 x i8>) to sequence of ST1.b.
+static SDValue combineI8TruncStore(StoreSDNode *ST,
https://github.com/felix642 deleted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77816
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/felix642 requested changes to this pull request.
Looks good! I was able run your code on llvm's project and I'm happy with the
changes that I see. There is maybe one more use case that we should check
before I am ready to approve (Except what Piotr has already highlighted)
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+//===--- UseStdMinMaxCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
https://github.com/felix642 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77816
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/nickdesaulniers approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79225
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Alan Zhao (alanzhao1)
Changes
This test was originally introduced in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76976, but it incorrectly tests
braced-list initialization instead of parenthesized initialization.
---
Full diff:
https://github.com/alanzhao1 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79225
This test was originally introduced in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76976, but it incorrectly tests
braced-list initialization instead of parenthesized initialization.
>From
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Fangrui Song (MaskRay)
Changes
Fix missing test coverage after #70740 #70760
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79222.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (added) clang/test/Driver/unsupported-option-gpu.c (+7)
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Fangrui Song (MaskRay)
Changes
Fix missing test coverage after #70740 #70760
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79222.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (added) clang/test/Driver/unsupported-option-gpu.c (+7)
https://github.com/MaskRay created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79222
Fix missing test coverage after #70740 #70760
>From 3a2b2a1110e7b3348a12a6476ab014a469891062 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fangrui Song
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 15:13:49 -0800
Subject: [PATCH]
https://github.com/sott0n updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79098
>From cceb921d9bc7e3a4c1efe7050d6bfe6cb2eb49e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kohei Yamaguchi
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 14:30:02 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [mlir][bufferization] Fix SimplifyClones with dealloc
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: mkdir -p %t
+// RUN: split-file %s %t
+//
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/foo.cpp -I%t -fsyntax-only -verify
+
+//--- i.h
+#ifndef FOO_H
+#pragma once
+struct S{};
+#endif
+
+//--- foo.cpp
vsapsai wrote:
Personally
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: mkdir -p %t
+// RUN: split-file %s %t
+//
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/foo.cpp -I%t -fsyntax-only -verify
vsapsai wrote:
You don't really need `-I%t`, the test works without it. But don't have a
strong opinion.
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: mkdir -p %t
+// RUN: split-file %s %t
+//
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/foo.cpp -I%t -fsyntax-only -verify
+
+//--- i.h
+#ifndef FOO_H
vsapsai wrote:
The mismatch between i.h and FOO_H is slightly annoying but
@@ -1458,7 +1458,7 @@ bool HeaderSearch::ShouldEnterIncludeFile(Preprocessor
,
} else {
// Otherwise, if this is a #include of a file that was previously #import'd
// or if this is the second #include of a #pragma once file, ignore it.
-if
@@ -1458,7 +1458,7 @@ bool HeaderSearch::ShouldEnterIncludeFile(Preprocessor
,
} else {
// Otherwise, if this is a #include of a file that was previously #import'd
// or if this is the second #include of a #pragma once file, ignore it.
vsapsai
https://github.com/vsapsai approved this pull request.
Overall, the change works fine and it is pretty small. Have a few minor
suggestion for the test but nothing blocking.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76119
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/vsapsai edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76119
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/topperc approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79015
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -281,23 +279,19 @@ entry:
define void @store_trunc_add_from_64bits(ptr %src, ptr %dst) {
; CHECK-LABEL: store_trunc_add_from_64bits:
; CHECK: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
-; CHECK-NEXT:sub sp, sp, #16
-; CHECK-NEXT:.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
; CHECK-NEXT:ldr s0, [x0]
;
https://github.com/yuxuanchen1997 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78801
>From 04e085570c03af9f4b877d75cf3cccd33b7b76c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yuxuan Chen
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 13:42:46 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Refactor and fix Lambda prototype instantiation when it's
https://github.com/changpeng closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79218
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -281,23 +279,19 @@ entry:
define void @store_trunc_add_from_64bits(ptr %src, ptr %dst) {
; CHECK-LABEL: store_trunc_add_from_64bits:
; CHECK: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
-; CHECK-NEXT:sub sp, sp, #16
-; CHECK-NEXT:.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
; CHECK-NEXT:ldr s0, [x0]
;
@@ -21471,6 +21471,57 @@ bool isHalvingTruncateOfLegalScalableType(EVT SrcVT,
EVT DstVT) {
(SrcVT == MVT::nxv2i64 && DstVT == MVT::nxv2i32);
}
+// Combine store (trunc X to <3 x i8>) to sequence of ST1.b.
+static SDValue combineI8TruncStore(StoreSDNode *ST,
@@ -21471,6 +21471,57 @@ bool isHalvingTruncateOfLegalScalableType(EVT SrcVT,
EVT DstVT) {
(SrcVT == MVT::nxv2i64 && DstVT == MVT::nxv2i32);
}
+// Combine store (trunc X to <3 x i8>) to sequence of ST1.b.
+static SDValue combineI8TruncStore(StoreSDNode *ST,
https://github.com/rampitec approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79218
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jkorous-apple edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77148
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -594,6 +667,44 @@ class PointerArithmeticGadget : public WarningGadget {
// FIXME: this gadge will need a fix-it
};
+class SpanTwoParamConstructorGadget : public WarningGadget {
+ static constexpr const char *const SpanTwoParamConstructorTag =
+
https://github.com/jkorous-apple approved this pull request.
I will just say that I didn't imagine this warning to be made part of the
analysis machine we use to produce fixits and it seems like at couple places
the patch struggles with the abstractions the machine uses but overall I don't
bwendling wrote:
It matches my understanding too. There are more issues with `__bdos` that arose
due to this discussion and related discussions with the GCC maintainers.
I'm exploring some ways of fixing this issue:
* As @efriedma-quic mentioned, generating the size calculation in the front
https://github.com/shiltian closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78333
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Shilei Tian
Date: 2024-01-23T17:08:04-05:00
New Revision: dc410f94f602390a65c832cf348b9ee6556b1809
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dc410f94f602390a65c832cf348b9ee6556b1809
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dc410f94f602390a65c832cf348b9ee6556b1809.diff
https://github.com/usx95 closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79206
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Utkarsh Saxena
Date: 2024-01-23T23:07:00+01:00
New Revision: 729657d6e15d047f35485deb87313ccdde10
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/729657d6e15d047f35485deb87313ccdde10
DIFF:
usx95 wrote:
Thanks. This is trivial and might not require another pair of eyes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79206
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ilovepi wrote:
Since this has passed Linux premerge checks and I think Windows CI is having
some issues I tested this locally on a Windows machine and its passing. I'm
going to go ahead and merge.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79061
___
@@ -1127,6 +1134,11 @@
PassBuilder::buildModuleSimplificationPipeline(OptimizationLevel Level,
if (EnableSyntheticCounts && !PGOOpt)
MPM.addPass(SyntheticCountsPropagation());
+ if (EnableMarkColdFunctions && PGOOpt &&
+ (PGOOpt->Action == PGOOptions::SampleUse
https://github.com/ilovepi closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79061
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Paul Kirth
Date: 2024-01-23T14:04:52-08:00
New Revision: 9d476e1e1a18af390e3455a6622ee67a69c64103
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9d476e1e1a18af390e3455a6622ee67a69c64103
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9d476e1e1a18af390e3455a6622ee67a69c64103.diff
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+//===--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
https://github.com/aeubanks updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69030
>From e52a811c3b643548837b4e630e8293a0b6857ad4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arthur Eubanks
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 14:40:28 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [PGO] Add ability to mark cold functions as
@@ -21248,6 +21248,51 @@ static SDValue foldTruncStoreOfExt(SelectionDAG ,
SDNode *N) {
return SDValue();
}
+// A custom combine to lower load <3 x i8> as the more efficient sequence
+// below:
+//ldrb wX, [x0, #2]
+//ldrh wY, [x0]
+//orr wX, wY, wX, lsl #16
https://github.com/efriedma-quic closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78916
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Billy Laws
Date: 2024-01-23T13:57:28-08:00
New Revision: 2227e50c618ecc6f83e8c69286a418ee04750361
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2227e50c618ecc6f83e8c69286a418ee04750361
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2227e50c618ecc6f83e8c69286a418ee04750361.diff
@@ -1127,6 +1134,11 @@
PassBuilder::buildModuleSimplificationPipeline(OptimizationLevel Level,
if (EnableSyntheticCounts && !PGOOpt)
MPM.addPass(SyntheticCountsPropagation());
+ if (EnableMarkColdFunctions && PGOOpt &&
+ (PGOOpt->Action == PGOOptions::SampleUse
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+//===- MarkColdFunctions.h - *- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
https://github.com/aeubanks updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69030
>From e52a811c3b643548837b4e630e8293a0b6857ad4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arthur Eubanks
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 14:40:28 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [PGO] Add ability to mark cold functions as
mizvekov wrote:
The change is correct. The problem is subtle though. It comes from the
difference in behavior between the member and non-member Profile functions.
I think we could do better instead with a change which makes it harder to trip
on this.
I think a simplification like this should
MaskRay wrote:
Hi, do you have more information (like a reproduce tarball) about a `file` that
references a file of `InternalKind`? Could it be a patch in your downstream?
If `file` references a file of `InternalKind`, we probably should make it
`nullptr`
https://github.com/lntue updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78333
>From 5eb2678a0a6a55c2d441b322d4eaaa8fe829a30f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shilei Tian
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 16:14:48 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang][Driver] Fix `--save-temps` for OpenCL AoT compilation
We can
https://github.com/shiltian updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78333
>From 5eb2678a0a6a55c2d441b322d4eaaa8fe829a30f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shilei Tian
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 16:14:48 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang][Driver] Fix `--save-temps` for OpenCL AoT compilation
We
https://github.com/ributzka closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79073
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Juergen Ributzka
Date: 2024-01-23T13:14:17-08:00
New Revision: 4ad4c8e90e120687e768475fecb8cc03d422b3a1
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4ad4c8e90e120687e768475fecb8cc03d422b3a1
DIFF:
https://github.com/Bryce-MW updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77964
>From d4c312b9dbf447d0a53dda0e6cdc482bd908430b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bryce Wilson
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 16:01:32 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] [X86] Use RORX over SHR imm
---
@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
+//===--- IncludesSeparator.cpp ---*- C++ -*-===//
HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
Maybe you could work something out with the line type?
MaskRay wrote:
> We're seeing a test failure on our buildbot after this patch landed. Could
> you take a look?
>
> [lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/216/builds/33382/steps/7/logs/FAIL__lld__defsym_ll](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/216/builds/33382/steps/7/logs/FAIL__lld__defsym_ll)
@@ -307,8 +307,11 @@ public:
: __data_(__s),
__size_(__len) {
#if _LIBCPP_STD_VER >= 14
-_LIBCPP_ASSERT_UNCATEGORIZED(__len <=
static_cast(numeric_limits::max()),
- "string_view::string_view(_CharT *, size_t):
length does not
@@ -4006,11 +3993,58 @@ bool TokenAnnotator::spaceRequiredBetween(const
AnnotatedLine ,
}
if (Left.is(tok::l_paren) || Right.is(tok::r_paren)) {
-return (Right.is(TT_CastRParen) ||
-(Left.MatchingParen && Left.MatchingParen->is(TT_CastRParen)))
-
@@ -4006,11 +3993,58 @@ bool TokenAnnotator::spaceRequiredBetween(const
AnnotatedLine ,
}
if (Left.is(tok::l_paren) || Right.is(tok::r_paren)) {
-return (Right.is(TT_CastRParen) ||
-(Left.MatchingParen && Left.MatchingParen->is(TT_CastRParen)))
-
@@ -4542,18 +4542,51 @@ struct FormatStyle {
/// Other: true
HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
Add the options here too?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77522
___
cfe-commits mailing list
@@ -4006,11 +3993,58 @@ bool TokenAnnotator::spaceRequiredBetween(const
AnnotatedLine ,
}
if (Left.is(tok::l_paren) || Right.is(tok::r_paren)) {
-return (Right.is(TT_CastRParen) ||
-(Left.MatchingParen && Left.MatchingParen->is(TT_CastRParen)))
-
@@ -4542,18 +4542,51 @@ struct FormatStyle {
/// Other: true
/// \endcode
struct SpacesInParensCustom {
+/// Override any of the following options to prevent addition of space
+/// between the first two parentheses in situations where a pair of
+///
https://github.com/11happy edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77816
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ormris wrote:
We're seeing a test failure on our buildbot after this patch landed. Could you
take a look?
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/216/builds/33382/steps/7/logs/FAIL__lld__defsym_ll
```
# RUN: at line 4
z:\b\llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-win\build\bin\llvm-as.exe
https://github.com/PiotrZSL approved this pull request.
LGTM.
But please note that I'm not too familiar with coroutines.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79206
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -2000,6 +2000,14 @@ bool RISCVTargetLowering::shouldSinkOperands(
if (!I->getType()->isVectorTy() || !Subtarget.hasVInstructions())
return false;
+ // Don't sink splat operands if the target prefers it. Some targets requires
michaelmaitland wrote:
https://github.com/michaelmaitland edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79015
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/michaelmaitland updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79015
>From 639d404b3b8a8ca7e92160fa8512459be07e631f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Maitland
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 07:53:55 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [RISCV] Add sifive-p670 processor
This is an OOO
vitalybuka wrote:
Not needed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78813
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78813
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/bhamiltoncx closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79051
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Ben Hamilton (Ben Gertzfield)
Date: 2024-01-23T13:32:41-07:00
New Revision: d813af73f70f6b2fd41621d640cc35e595b9da4c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d813af73f70f6b2fd41621d640cc35e595b9da4c
DIFF:
https://github.com/HazardyKnusperkeks approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79051
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
nikic wrote:
Thanks for summarizing, that matches my understanding.
As to how to implement this "properly", that would probably be
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/exploring-the-effects-and-uses-of-the-memory-region-declaration-intrinsic/72756.
The memory.region.decl intrinsics effectively encode
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: Utkarsh Saxena (usx95)
Changes
We were previously allowlisting awaitable types returned by `await_transform`
instead of the type of the operand of the `co_await` expression.
This previously
https://github.com/usx95 ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79206
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/usx95 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79206
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/usx95 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79206
>From 28d90711ff8e4924135d4bd4e5f252d96ac41b93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Utkarsh Saxena
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 20:18:25 +
Subject: [PATCH] [misc-coroutine-hostile-raii] Use getOperand instead of
https://github.com/usx95 created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79206
We were previously allowlisting awaitable types returned by `await_transform`
instead of the type of the operand of the `co_await` expression.
>From 28d90711ff8e4924135d4bd4e5f252d96ac41b93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
bylaws wrote:
@efriedma-quic Fair enough, I found this cleaned up things on the compiler-rt
side but even then it still needed changes to handle concatenating a #, and I'd
imagine that to be the same for any other existing user. It would still be nice
to have something equivalent to A64NAME
https://github.com/bylaws closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78913
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2000,6 +2000,14 @@ bool RISCVTargetLowering::shouldSinkOperands(
if (!I->getType()->isVectorTy() || !Subtarget.hasVInstructions())
return false;
+ // Don't sink splat operands if the target prefers it. Some targets requires
topperc wrote:
These
everythingfunctional wrote:
> > Not that it's the end of the world if this doesn't get in before the this
> > release, but @sscalpone , exactly what feedback are we wanting before
> > merging?
>
> IIUC, this:
> https://discourse.llvm.org/t/proposal-rename-flang-new-to-flang/69462/55
ok, but
banach-space wrote:
> Not that it's the end of the world if this doesn't get in before the this
> release, but @sscalpone , exactly what feedback are we wanting before merging?
IIUC, this:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/proposal-rename-flang-new-to-flang/69462/55
https://github.com/bylaws edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78916
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
efriedma-quic wrote:
Trying to summarize my understanding here:
- Using the type of an alloca in LLVM IR is wrong, for a variety of reasons.
(At this point, the type of an alloca is basically just leftover junk from
before the opaque pointer transition; I expect that we'll kill it off
@@ -1082,6 +1082,13 @@ def TuneShortForwardBranchOpt
def HasShortForwardBranchOpt :
Predicate<"Subtarget->hasShortForwardBranchOpt()">;
def NoShortForwardBranchOpt :
Predicate<"!Subtarget->hasShortForwardBranchOpt()">;
+// P670 requires a S2V transfer buffer to move scalars
https://github.com/AtariDreams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79191
>From 9d8ca53e5439f838eea7c8d8531cac6c27df2c47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rose <83477269+ataridre...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 13:59:05 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Use unaligned atomic
https://github.com/michaelmaitland updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79015
>From 639d404b3b8a8ca7e92160fa8512459be07e631f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Maitland
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 07:53:55 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [RISCV] Add sifive-p670 processor
This is an OOO
@@ -241,7 +241,17 @@
// MCPU-SIFIVE-P450-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zbb"
// MCPU-SIFIVE-P450-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zbs"
// MCPU-SIFIVE-P450-SAME: "-target-abi" "lp64d"
-//
+
+// RUN: %clang -target riscv64 -### -c %s 2>&1 -mcpu=sifive-p670 | FileCheck
felix642 wrote:
@11happy I was testing with `d5b8dc25598` but this seems to be working
properly now. I would assume that this has been fixed in your latest commits
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77816
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/AtariDreams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79191
>From 9454e1cc48088508d4df33b7a4de47418de03348 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rose <83477269+ataridre...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 13:59:05 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Use unaligned atomic
bylaws wrote:
@efriedma-quic should be fixed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78916
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/bylaws updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78916
>From 76e6e6fb01868a73c0c35c1a8a04ac34af2ea088 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Billy Laws
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 22:55:44 +
Subject: [PATCH] [Preprocessor][test] Test ARM64EC definitions
---
@@ -15,7 +19,7 @@ if(LLVM_BUILD_INSTRUMENTED)
)
petrhosek wrote:
Looks like I added that in https://reviews.llvm.org/D138974 but I'm not aware
of it being used anywhere at the moment. I'd still prefer renaming it to
`CLANG_PGO_TRAINING_DEPS` for
Mirko =?utf-8?q?Brkušanin?= ,
Mirko =?utf-8?q?Brkušanin?= ,Mirko Brkusanin
,Mariusz Sikora
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/Sisyph commented:
DPP changes look good, and functionally I'm fine with the patch.
I don't think the tablegen 'bit IsFP8' version of managing the op_sel
101 - 200 of 461 matches
Mail list logo
