@@ -167,6 +167,10 @@ def FeatureCuMode : SubtargetFeature<"cumode",
"Enable CU wavefront execution mode"
>;
+def FeaturePreciseMemory
jwanggit86 wrote:
End user needs this, so a clang command-line option has been added. There was a
lot discussion on this.
@@ -641,6 +644,9 @@ class SIMemoryLegalizer final : public MachineFunctionPass {
bool expandAtomicCmpxchgOrRmw(const SIMemOpInfo &MOI,
MachineBasicBlock::iterator &MI);
+ bool GFX9InsertWaitcntForPreciseMem(MachineFunction &MF);
-
https://github.com/harbandana reopened
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80064
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/harbandana closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80064
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jyu2-git approved this pull request.
LGTM. Thanks for fixing.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80065
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/harbandana reopened
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80064
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/harbandana closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80064
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Kaur-sukhmani updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80063
>From c0ba8ba70d545ad0cbeb9d90c3fb0826681c3c5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sukhmani
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 03:06:36 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Refactor clang::Linkage
---
clang/lib/AST/APValue.cpp | 9
https://github.com/harbandana reopened
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80064
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
jhuber6 wrote:
This is related to the discussions at the
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/77018 issue.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80066
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/ma
https://github.com/harbandana closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80064
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Joseph Huber (jhuber6)
Changes
Summary:
The standard GPU compilation process embeds each intermediate object
file into the host file at the `.llvm.offloading` section so it can be
linked later. We also use a sepcial section called something
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Joseph Huber (jhuber6)
Changes
Summary:
The standard GPU compilation process embeds each intermediate object
file into the host file at the `.llvm.offloading` section so it can be
linked later. We also use a sepcial section called so
https://github.com/jhuber6 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80066
Summary:
The standard GPU compilation process embeds each intermediate object
file into the host file at the `.llvm.offloading` section so it can be
linked later. We also use a sepcial section called something lik
ldionne wrote:
> I am concerned that `-fstdlib-hardening=` may not map to libstdc++ preferred
> enabling mechanism cleanly. There is a non-zero probability that GCC folks
> would not add an option that just passes a `-D...` to cc1. Then this driver
> option will feel like a libc++ specific fea
https://github.com/MaskRay closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79924
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 143b510a8fefb0d203c9ac7e036aa9967dd8a2ef
c0ba8ba70d545ad0cbeb9d90c3fb0826681c3c5f --
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
@llvm/pr-subscribers-compiler-rt-sanitizer
Author: None (harbandana)
Changes
---
Patch is 187.54 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80064.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified)
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (Kaur-sukhmani)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80063.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/APValue.cpp (+8-1)
``diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/APValue.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/A
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it i
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it i
dwblaikie wrote:
Sure - wrote down my thoughts here:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/prs-without-approvals-muddy-the-waters/76656 (my
understanding is that this (waiting for approval after sending out a review -
and that all PRs are reviews until we figure out a way to differentiate them)
is exi
https://github.com/Kaur-sukhmani created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80063
None
>From c0ba8ba70d545ad0cbeb9d90c3fb0826681c3c5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sukhmani
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 03:06:36 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] Refactor clang::Linkage
---
clang/lib/AST/APValue.cpp |
erichkeane wrote:
> @AaronBallman @zygoloid There probably is a missing ODR-use marking
> somewhere, if you have a clue [#78041
> (comment)](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78041#issuecomment-1917571069)
>
> Alas we do not seem to have a repro for the chromium-reported issue which
>
cor3ntin wrote:
@AaronBallman @zygoloid
There probably is a missing ODR-use marking somewhere, if you have a clue
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78041#issuecomment-1917571069
Alas we do not seem to have a repro for the chromium-reported issue which make
debugging it difficult.
http
https://github.com/erichkeane edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80050
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/WenleiHe commented:
FWIW we've tried this with sampling PGO in the past. While on paper this seems
like an obvious thing to do, in reality aggressively tuning down opt level for
cold functions can lead to regression since profile isn't always accurate.
That said, as long as
https://github.com/erichkeane commented:
Are there any release-notes that should be reverted with this? or at least
modified, since this is reverting stuff?
Also, can you please add the tests/regressions that were found that have lead
to this partial revert?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-proj
https://github.com/vitalybuka approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79924
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -4552,16 +4552,22 @@ struct MemorySanitizerVisitor : public
InstVisitor {
}
if (!ElemTy->isSized())
return;
-Value *SizeVal =
- IRB.CreateTypeSize(MS.IntptrTy, DL.getTypeStoreSize(ElemTy));
+auto Size = DL.getTypeStoreSize(ElemTy);
+Value *Siz
@@ -4552,16 +4552,22 @@ struct MemorySanitizerVisitor : public
InstVisitor {
}
if (!ElemTy->isSized())
return;
-Value *SizeVal =
- IRB.CreateTypeSize(MS.IntptrTy, DL.getTypeStoreSize(ElemTy));
+auto Size = DL.getTypeStoreSize(ElemTy);
+Value *Siz
@@ -11,11 +15,11 @@ if(LLVM_BUILD_INSTRUMENTED)
add_lit_testsuite(generate-profraw "Generating clang PGO data"
${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/pgo-data/
EXCLUDE_FROM_CHECK_ALL
-DEPENDS clang clear-profraw ${CLANG_PERF_TRAINING_DEPS}
+DEPENDS clang clear-profraw ${
@@ -346,6 +346,14 @@ class CGDebugInfo {
const FieldDecl *BitFieldDecl, const llvm::DIDerivedType *BitFieldDI,
llvm::ArrayRef PreviousFieldsDI, const RecordDecl *RD);
+ // A cache that maps artificial inlined function names used for
+ // __builtin_verbose_trap to
@@ -3424,6 +3445,26 @@ llvm::DIMacroFile
*CGDebugInfo::CreateTempMacroFile(llvm::DIMacroFile *Parent,
return DBuilder.createTempMacroFile(Parent, Line, FName);
}
+llvm::DILocation *CGDebugInfo::CreateTrapFailureMessageFor(
dwblaikie wrote:
There's currentl
@@ -3424,6 +3445,26 @@ llvm::DIMacroFile
*CGDebugInfo::CreateTempMacroFile(llvm::DIMacroFile *Parent,
return DBuilder.createTempMacroFile(Parent, Line, FName);
}
+llvm::DILocation *CGDebugInfo::CreateTrapFailureMessageFor(
+llvm::DebugLoc TrapLocation, StringRef Prefix,
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ set(CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE RELEASE CACHE STRING "")
set(CLANG_ENABLE_BOOTSTRAP ON CACHE BOOL "")
set(LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS "clang;lld" CACHE STRING "")
-set(LLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES "compiler-rt;libcxx;libcxxabi" CACHE STRING "")
+set(LLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES "compiler-rt;lib
https://github.com/ymand closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80030
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Yitzhak Mandelbaum
Date: 2024-01-30T16:09:16-05:00
New Revision: 2c5a0d392592982bb9c73cbc10c64390b9045873
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2c5a0d392592982bb9c73cbc10c64390b9045873
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2c5a0d392592982bb9c73cbc10c64390b9045873.
https://github.com/ymand edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80030
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ymand updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80030
>From 4ea1f14cfd835308064579554c3b8f5ce71ef0c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yitzhak Mandelbaum
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 21:26:27 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][CFG] Change child order in Reverse Post Order (RPO)
it
aaupov wrote:
I'm in favor of this change especially in context of CSSPGO profiling
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79942) and BOLT LBR profiling
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69133).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78879
__
https://github.com/ymand closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80033
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Yitzhak Mandelbaum
Date: 2024-01-30T16:05:25-05:00
New Revision: a385c379f8694f42d1efb88bb8c5a53fccb6a664
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a385c379f8694f42d1efb88bb8c5a53fccb6a664
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a385c379f8694f42d1efb88bb8c5a53fccb6a664.
@@ -1293,8 +1293,19 @@ bool AArch64CallLowering::lowerCall(MachineIRBuilder
&MIRBuilder,
!Subtarget.noBTIAtReturnTwice() &&
MF.getInfo()->branchTargetEnforcement())
Opc = AArch64::BLR_BTI;
- else
+ else {
+// For an intrinsic call (e.g. memset),
https://github.com/ymand updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80033
>From 221ceddcca1f045725216c09432216440d1c6b63 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yitzhak Mandelbaum
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 16:52:13 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][dataflow] Drop block-relative cap on worklist
iteratio
https://github.com/fmayer approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79924
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ymand updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80033
>From bb93306b6fdefa6d00622386af93d3baef251c2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yitzhak Mandelbaum
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 16:52:13 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][dataflow] Drop block-relative cap on worklist
iteratio
nemanjai wrote:
Fix in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80058
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68919
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/syzaara updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67999
>From dced11bd242aba08158a5a0a399b2b0ea7381a69 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zaara Syeda
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 15:01:56 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [AIX][TOC] Add -mtocdata/-mno-tocdata options on AIX
This patc
Author: erichkeane
Date: 2024-01-30T12:48:16-08:00
New Revision: 66ef6900f9f3aa4fab9f6e36af04f775948cdf9d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/66ef6900f9f3aa4fab9f6e36af04f775948cdf9d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/66ef6900f9f3aa4fab9f6e36af04f775948cdf9d.diff
LO
Author: erichkeane
Date: 2024-01-30T12:48:16-08:00
New Revision: 0dd0cbd324ad13dd7b91edf69a2ca66a6a208c80
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0dd0cbd324ad13dd7b91edf69a2ca66a6a208c80
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0dd0cbd324ad13dd7b91edf69a2ca66a6a208c80.diff
LO
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Nemanja Ivanovic (nemanjai)
Changes
My recent commit (67c1c1d) made the CPU ID builtins target-independent so they
can be used on PPC as well. However, that had the unintended consequence of
changing the behaviour of __has_builtin in that
https://github.com/nemanjai created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80058
My recent commit (67c1c1d) made the CPU ID builtins target-independent so they
can be used on PPC as well. However, that had the unintended consequence of
changing the behaviour of __has_builtin in that it repo
https://github.com/torshepherd updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79867
>From 0ed7667a5b48064a492f7f125a4002912a35fec7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tor Shepherd
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 11:44:25 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] initial cut
---
clang-tools-extra/clangd/Diagnostics.cpp
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77020
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77020
>From c5bac325802c65f65a8d99e8d82a7e8079c21fb4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aiden Grossman
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 01:47:49 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [llvm-exegesis] Add middle half repetition mode
This
nemanjai wrote:
Sorry, I'll put up a patch for review shortly to fix this problem.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68919
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/torshepherd edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79867
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/torshepherd edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79867
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Jinsong Ji
Date: 2024-01-30T15:22:45-05:00
New Revision: 235f1e74fe240e414718c64d05bafc01d34c32cb
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/235f1e74fe240e414718c64d05bafc01d34c32cb
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/235f1e74fe240e414718c64d05bafc01d34c32cb.diff
LO
https://github.com/jsji closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80012
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
torshepherd wrote:
Hmm I noticed another mini-issue. Ideally we shouldn't have a 'fix all clangd'
quick fix if all of the issues come from the same source, only the 'fix all _'
option
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79867
___
cfe-commits ma
https://github.com/topperc approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79911
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mehnadnerd updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79911
>From bfa9b7043d89de78e66f5073c3b34b66defdc2f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: brs
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 17:16:45 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [RISCV][MC] MC layer support for the experimental zalasr
extension
---
lei137 wrote:
Hi Aokamal,
This maco was not taken into account in the implementation. Can you please open
a bug and assign the issue to nemanjai?
Thank-you for reporting this.
Regards,
Lei
From: Aokamal ***@***.***>
Date: Tuesday, January 30, 2024 at 10:30 AM
To: llvm/llvm-project ***@***.**
bolshakov-a wrote:
#80050 opened. Nevertheless, a reproducer for future work would be appreciated.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78041
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/c
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+# RUN: llvm-mc %s -triple=riscv32 -mattr=+experimental-zalasr
-riscv-no-aliases -show-encoding \
topperc wrote:
It's not very obvious from the test names, but I think the convention for the
`-valid.s` tests is usually that the `rv32` test cont
bolshakov-a wrote:
@erichkeane, @cor3ntin
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80050
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Andrey Ali Khan Bolshakov (bolshakov-a)
Changes
This returns (probably temporarily) array-referring NTTP behavior to which was
prior to #78041 because ~~I'm fed up~~ have no time to fix regressions.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+//===-- RISCVInstrInfoZalasr.td - RISC-V 'Zalasr' instructions ---*-
tablegen -*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Ident
https://github.com/bolshakov-a created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80050
This returns (probably temporarily) array-referring NTTP behavior to which was
prior to #78041 because ~~I'm fed up~~ have no time to fix regressions.
>From 0ccf1c9eeec7641dfdca9f8a06499512f98ba6da Mon Sep 1
eaeltsin wrote:
> @eaeltsin, could you try out [that
> branch](https://github.com/bolshakov-a/llvm-project/tree/avoid_regressions)?
@bolshakov-a yes, this patch makes the "undefined symbol" linker error go away.
Will you proceed with submitting?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78
@@ -145,6 +145,7 @@
// CHECK-NOT: __riscv_zacas {{.*$}}
// CHECK-NOT: __riscv_zalrsc {{.*$}}
// CHECK-NOT: __riscv_zcmop {{.*$}}
+// CHECK-NOT: __riscv_zalasr {{.*$}}
mehnadnerd wrote:
Done, there was another place in the same file I fixed
https://github.com/
https://github.com/mehnadnerd updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79911
>From 1612df14bf52085ed1dd1a1c815a0515930c9d6e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: brs
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 17:16:45 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [RISCV][MC] MC layer support for the experimental zalasr
extension
---
@@ -145,6 +145,7 @@
// CHECK-NOT: __riscv_zacas {{.*$}}
// CHECK-NOT: __riscv_zalrsc {{.*$}}
// CHECK-NOT: __riscv_zcmop {{.*$}}
+// CHECK-NOT: __riscv_zalasr {{.*$}}
topperc wrote:
this list is roughly in alphabetical order, can you alphabetize zalasr above
https://github.com/mehnadnerd updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79911
>From 7f60b4aae0d75aabad7ecf159a7cd09420af6998 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: brs
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 17:16:45 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [RISCV][MC] MC layer support for the experimental zalasr
extension
---
nico wrote:
My bot is happy again, thanks.
Please run tests before committing :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80035
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
david-xl wrote:
> How does this relate to the existing `shouldOptimizeForSize(Function&, ...)`
> and `shouldOptimizeForSize(MachineFunction&, ...)` APIs which appear to
> provide similar functionality at a first glance. If they are the same, then
> we should have a plan in place to cleanup and
jhuber6 wrote:
> i.e. it helped with Clang :: Preprocessor/predefined-arch-macros.c but not
> with:
>
> Failed Tests (2): Clang :: Driver/amdgpu-macros.cl Clang ::
> Driver/target-id-macros.cl
Pushed a fix, `check-clang` passes on my machine now. Let me know if it's still
broken.
https://gi
Author: Joseph Huber
Date: 2024-01-30T13:45:01-06:00
New Revision: 6fecfbc7b62f54bd633e83c22630d7c2a3e5741e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6fecfbc7b62f54bd633e83c22630d7c2a3e5741e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6fecfbc7b62f54bd633e83c22630d7c2a3e5741e.diff
@@ -2735,6 +2735,41 @@ TEST(TransferTest,
ResultObjectLocationForDefaultInitExpr) {
});
}
+// This test ensures that CXXOperatorCallExpr returning prvalues are correctly
+// handled by the transfer functions, especially that `getResultObjectLocation`
+// correctly retur
@@ -2735,6 +2735,41 @@ TEST(TransferTest,
ResultObjectLocationForDefaultInitExpr) {
});
}
+// This test ensures that CXXOperatorCallExpr returning prvalues are correctly
+// handled by the transfer functions, especially that `getResultObjectLocation`
+// correctly retur
https://github.com/martinboehme approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79608
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2735,6 +2735,41 @@ TEST(TransferTest,
ResultObjectLocationForDefaultInitExpr) {
});
}
+// This test ensures that CXXOperatorCallExpr returning prvalues are correctly
+// handled by the transfer functions, especially that `getResultObjectLocation`
+// correctly retur
https://github.com/martinboehme edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79608
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
SuperSodaSea wrote:
By the way, maybe we should add a clangd label to this PR?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68485
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
jhuber6 wrote:
> i.e. it helped with Clang :: Preprocessor/predefined-arch-macros.c but not
> with:
>
> Failed Tests (2): Clang :: Driver/amdgpu-macros.cl Clang ::
> Driver/target-id-macros.cl
Thanks, seeing it locally now. I'll try to fix it quick and revert if it's not
working soon.
https
nico wrote:
i.e. it helped with Clang :: Preprocessor/predefined-arch-macros.c but not
with:
Failed Tests (2):
Clang :: Driver/amdgpu-macros.cl
Clang :: Driver/target-id-macros.cl
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80035
___
cfe-commits
SuperSodaSea wrote:
https://github.com/SuperSodaSea/llvm-project/blob/1ceaae47b2b43fd8fa5512e20e0b32a7e8f4ab5b/clang-tools-extra/clangd/InlayHints.cpp#L660-L664
```diff
if (const CXXMethodDecl *Method =
dyn_cast_or_null(Callee.Decl))
- if (Method->isInstance() &&
-
nico wrote:
This is with that change: http://45.33.8.238/linux/129493/step_7.txt
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80035
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
jhuber6 wrote:
> This seems to break tests: http://45.33.8.238/linux/129493/step_7.txt
>
> Please take a look and revert for now if it takes a while to fix.
Is it still broken? I pushed a fix because I'm pretty sure the problem was not
passing `-nogpulib` `-nogpuinc` so the test runs on machin
https://github.com/martinboehme approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80033
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
nico wrote:
This seems to break tests: http://45.33.8.238/linux/129493/step_7.txt
Please take a look and revert for now if it takes a while to fix.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80035
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.or
@@ -3520,6 +3520,27 @@ def fpass_plugin_EQ : Joined<["-"], "fpass-plugin=">,
MetaVarName<"">,
HelpText<"Load pass plugin from a dynamic shared object file (only with new
pass manager).">,
MarshallingInfoStringVector>;
+defm tocdata : BoolOption<"m","tocdata",
+ CodeGenO
@@ -3520,6 +3520,27 @@ def fpass_plugin_EQ : Joined<["-"], "fpass-plugin=">,
MetaVarName<"">,
HelpText<"Load pass plugin from a dynamic shared object file (only with new
pass manager).">,
MarshallingInfoStringVector>;
+defm tocdata : BoolOption<"m","tocdata",
+ CodeGenO
@@ -3520,6 +3520,27 @@ def fpass_plugin_EQ : Joined<["-"], "fpass-plugin=">,
MetaVarName<"">,
HelpText<"Load pass plugin from a dynamic shared object file (only with new
pass manager).">,
MarshallingInfoStringVector>;
+defm tocdata : BoolOption<"m","tocdata",
+ CodeGenO
Author: Joseph Huber
Date: 2024-01-30T13:17:02-06:00
New Revision: 626fe71fa5ed79cbd41b7b29582560d7adb1220e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/626fe71fa5ed79cbd41b7b29582560d7adb1220e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/626fe71fa5ed79cbd41b7b29582560d7adb1220e.diff
AaronBallman wrote:
CC @zyn0217 as the original author of that test case and @HighCommander4 as the
original reviewer.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68485
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-b
SuperSodaSea wrote:
It seems that clangd doesn't like the new usage for the static operator of the
CXXOperatorCallExpr, so the hint is misplaced. I'm looking into
**clang-tools-extra/clangd/InlayHints.cpp** now...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68485
@@ -4991,18 +4991,17 @@ ASTReader::ASTReadResult
ASTReader::readUnhashedControlBlockImpl(
F->PragmaDiagMappings.insert(F->PragmaDiagMappings.end(),
Record.begin(), Record.end());
break;
-case HEADER_SEARCH_ENTRY_USAGE:
-
201 - 300 of 629 matches
Mail list logo
