@@ -1402,6 +1402,29 @@ def CXX11NoReturn : InheritableAttr {
let Documentation = [CXX11NoReturnDocs];
}
+def NoLock : DeclOrTypeAttr {
+ let Spellings = [CXX11<"clang", "nolock">,
+ C23<"clang", "nolock">,
+ GNU<"clang_nolock">];
+
+ //
jhuber6 wrote:
> Do you mean the SPIR-V target (backend)? I have not followed this area of
> work closely. What is missing or what exactly needs to be supported by the
> SPIR-V target? Any help or pointers would be greatly appreciated!
I believe there was some work to port SYCL to work with
https://github.com/efriedma-quic commented:
Oh, this is making a bit more sense now... I didn't realize this was overriding
method that handles char/short already. And I guess for BPF targets, you can
assume "long" is 64 bits.
That said, this isn't handling "unsigned int" correctly.
@@ -18321,6 +18321,28 @@ bool Sema::CheckOverridingFunctionAttributes(const
CXXMethodDecl *New,
return true;
}
+ // Virtual overrides: check for matching effects.
Sirraide wrote:
Just a remark: Despite what I said wrt function declaration merging, I
@@ -1402,6 +1402,29 @@ def CXX11NoReturn : InheritableAttr {
let Documentation = [CXX11NoReturnDocs];
}
+def NoLock : DeclOrTypeAttr {
+ let Spellings = [CXX11<"clang", "nolock">,
+ C23<"clang", "nolock">,
+ GNU<"clang_nolock">];
+
+ //
@@ -11100,6 +11136,48 @@ Attr
*Sema::getImplicitCodeSegOrSectionAttrForFunction(const FunctionDecl *FD,
return nullptr;
}
+// Should only be called when getFunctionEffects() returns a non-empty set.
+// Decl should be a FunctionDecl or BlockDecl.
+void
@@ -7754,6 +7906,145 @@ QualType DecayedType::getPointeeType() const {
void FixedPointValueToString(SmallVectorImpl , llvm::APSInt Val,
unsigned Scale);
+//
--
+
+//
@@ -7754,6 +7905,145 @@ QualType DecayedType::getPointeeType() const {
void FixedPointValueToString(SmallVectorImpl , llvm::APSInt Val,
unsigned Scale);
+//
--
+
+//
@@ -2380,6 +2382,1239 @@ class UnsafeBufferUsageReporter : public
UnsafeBufferUsageHandler {
};
} // namespace
+//
=
+
+// Temporary debugging option
+#define FX_ANALYZER_VERIFY_DECL_LIST 1
+
@@ -10778,6 +10778,101 @@ def warn_imp_cast_drops_unaligned : Warning<
"implicit cast from type %0 to type %1 drops __unaligned qualifier">,
InGroup>;
+def warn_func_effect_allocates : Warning<
+ "'%0' function '%1' must not allocate or deallocate memory">,
+ InGroup;
+
@@ -3922,6 +3922,42 @@ bool Sema::MergeFunctionDecl(FunctionDecl *New,
NamedDecl *, Scope *S,
return true;
}
+ const auto OldFX = Old->getFunctionEffects();
+ const auto NewFX = New->getFunctionEffects();
+ if (OldFX != NewFX) {
+const auto Diffs =
@@ -4912,3 +4922,279 @@ void AutoType::Profile(llvm::FoldingSetNodeID ,
const ASTContext ) {
Profile(ID, Context, getDeducedType(), getKeyword(), isDependentType(),
getTypeConstraintConcept(), getTypeConstraintArguments());
}
+
+FunctionEffect::~FunctionEffect() =
@@ -2380,6 +2382,1239 @@ class UnsafeBufferUsageReporter : public
UnsafeBufferUsageHandler {
};
} // namespace
+//
=
+
+// Temporary debugging option
+#define FX_ANALYZER_VERIFY_DECL_LIST 1
+
@@ -10778,6 +10778,101 @@ def warn_imp_cast_drops_unaligned : Warning<
"implicit cast from type %0 to type %1 drops __unaligned qualifier">,
InGroup>;
+def warn_func_effect_allocates : Warning<
+ "'%0' function '%1' must not allocate or deallocate memory">,
+ InGroup;
+
@@ -7973,3 +7973,20 @@ requirement:
}
}];
}
+
+def NoLockNoAllocDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatType;
+ let Content = [{
+The ``nolock`` and ``noalloc`` attributes can be attached to functions,
blocks,
+function pointers, lambdas, and member functions.
https://github.com/Sirraide edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84983
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1402,6 +1402,29 @@ def CXX11NoReturn : InheritableAttr {
let Documentation = [CXX11NoReturnDocs];
}
+def NoLock : DeclOrTypeAttr {
+ let Spellings = [CXX11<"clang", "nolock">,
+ C23<"clang", "nolock">,
+ GNU<"clang_nolock">];
+
+ //
https://github.com/Sirraide requested changes to this pull request.
I was following this on Discourse, so I thought I’d take a look; overall, this
seems like a very interesting addition to Clang to me.
This is by no means a complete review; this pr is pretty big, so looking at
everything in
ahatanak wrote:
Maybe `emitRawPointerFromAddress` is better. I see a lot of functions starting
with `emit` in CodeGen.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67454
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -3173,41 +3174,46 @@ class ArrayType : public Type, public
llvm::FoldingSetNode {
return T->getTypeClass() == ConstantArray ||
T->getTypeClass() == VariableArray ||
T->getTypeClass() == IncompleteArray ||
- T->getTypeClass() ==
github-actions[bot] wrote:
⚠️ We detected that you are using a GitHub private e-mail address to contribute
to the repo.
Please turn off [Keep my email addresses
private](https://github.com/settings/emails) setting in your account.
See [LLVM
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format
Author: Ameer J (ameerj)
Changes
This adds an option to break function definition parameters, putting them on
the next line after the function's opening paren.
This was a missing step towards allowing styles
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you,
https://github.com/hvdijk closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81175
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
hvdijk wrote:
> I would really like to avoid Clang 18 being released in this broken state, if
> possible, and I see no way short of a revert to realistically achieve that.
It's too late for that now, it's out there, and it's now everybody else's
problem regardless of what Clang does in the
https://github.com/ameerj created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84988
This adds an option to break function definition parameters, putting them on
the next line after the function's opening paren.
This was a missing step towards allowing styles which require all function
@@ -2231,7 +2231,8 @@ Value *ScalarExprEmitter::VisitCastExpr(CastExpr *CE) {
case CK_UserDefinedConversion:
return Visit(const_cast(E));
- case CK_NoOp: {
+ case CK_NoOp:
+ case CK_HLSLArrayRValue: {
efriedma-quic wrote:
It shouldn't be possible to
@@ -500,6 +500,7 @@ ComplexPairTy ComplexExprEmitter::EmitCast(CastKind CK,
Expr *Op,
case CK_NoOp:
case CK_LValueToRValue:
case CK_UserDefinedConversion:
+ case CK_HLSLArrayRValue:
efriedma-quic wrote:
The result of an CK_HLSLArrayRValue can't be a
@@ -1442,6 +1445,7 @@ static bool castPreservesZero(const CastExpr *CE) {
case CK_BitCast:
case CK_ToUnion:
case CK_ToVoid:
+ case CK_HLSLArrayRValue:
efriedma-quic wrote:
Probably should be false, like other lvalue-to-rvalue casts?
https://github.com/efriedma-quic commented:
This seems like the right direction.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79382
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -10900,6 +10936,10 @@ QualType ASTContext::mergeTypes(QualType LHS, QualType
RHS, bool OfBlockPointer,
assert(LHS != RHS &&
"Equivalent pipe types should have already been handled!");
return {};
+ case Type::ArrayParameter:
+if (RHS != LHS)
@@ -1126,6 +1126,7 @@ class ConstExprEmitter :
case CK_NonAtomicToAtomic:
case CK_NoOp:
case CK_ConstructorConversion:
+case CK_HLSLArrayRValue:
efriedma-quic wrote:
We shouldn't accept CK_HLSLArrayRValue casts here (or if we do, we need to do
@@ -4655,6 +4655,13 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitCallArg(CallArgList ,
const Expr *E,
return emitWritebackArg(*this, args, CRE);
}
+ // If an argument is an array paramter expression being passed through. Emit
+ // the argument to a temporary and pass the temporary
https://github.com/efriedma-quic edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79382
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -26996,18 +26996,38 @@ class, structure, array, or other object.
Arguments:
""
-The ``llvm.objectsize`` intrinsic takes four arguments. The first argument is a
-pointer to or into the ``object``. The second argument determines whether
-``llvm.objectsize`` returns 0
michalpaszkowski wrote:
Hi @jhuber6! Thank you for the pull request!
> This is not intended to be landed immediately, but to allow for greater
> testing. One potential issue I've discovered is the lack of SPIR-V
> support or handling for `--offload`.
Do you mean the SPIR-V target (backend)? I
topperc wrote:
> I don't know if we need S-mode profile CPUs.
I lean towards not supporting them since the S extensions don't do anything in
the compiler except preprocessor defines and ELF attributes, but maybe we
should put it on the agenda for the sync meeting this week.
vvereschaka wrote:
Thank you @weliveindetail
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84460
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
weliveindetail wrote:
This should fix both: initializing the native target (your reported case) AND
skipping the test on platforms that don't support JIT (other build bots
complained).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84460
___
cfe-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84891
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Michael Buch
Date: 2024-03-12T22:19:09Z
New Revision: beb47e78be6a819b6501f99302c1c4c1ae84b90e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/beb47e78be6a819b6501f99302c1c4c1ae84b90e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/beb47e78be6a819b6501f99302c1c4c1ae84b90e.diff
LOG:
Author: Stefan Gränitz
Date: 2024-03-12T23:14:23+01:00
New Revision: d73c2d5df21735805a1f46a85790db64c0615e1c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d73c2d5df21735805a1f46a85790db64c0615e1c
DIFF:
@@ -26996,18 +26996,38 @@ class, structure, array, or other object.
Arguments:
""
-The ``llvm.objectsize`` intrinsic takes four arguments. The first argument is a
-pointer to or into the ``object``. The second argument determines whether
-``llvm.objectsize`` returns 0
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff f1ca2a09671e4d4acc2bea362b39268ed7883b6d
c31b2fd3cb923bc306cf9d086bb7723e4c7004cd --
https://github.com/topperc updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83896
>From f22a5cd30f77b2043f9c1f7f4482fad87fb79250 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Craig Topper
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 11:24:34 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [RISCV] Add back SiFive's cdiscard.d.l1 and cflush.d.l1
weiguozhi wrote:
> We have another use case for this calling convention - micropatching. See my
> coworker's blog post on how this would work:
> https://www.philipzucker.com/permutation_compile/
>
I'm happy to see it's useful to you.
> Is there a reason why r10 isn't included in the list of
@@ -857,8 +881,13 @@ void CXXRecordDecl::addedMember(Decl *D) {
data().HasDeclaredCopyAssignmentWithConstParam = true;
}
-if (Method->isMoveAssignmentOperator())
+if (Method->isMoveAssignmentOperator()) {
SMKind |= SMF_MoveAssignment;
+}
+
+
https://github.com/llvm-beanz updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79382
>From 762646ef1d95efa968199156b52a60c3472a7611 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Bieneman
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 15:37:50 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [HLSL] Pass arrays by value
HLSL constant sized array
https://github.com/llvm-beanz updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79382
>From 762646ef1d95efa968199156b52a60c3472a7611 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Bieneman
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 15:37:50 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [HLSL] Pass arrays by value
HLSL constant sized array
llvm-beanz wrote:
I force pushed an update here because the new implementation is basically a
complete rewrite based on @efriedma-quic's suggestion. I think this is a
significantly cleaner approach that more accurately models the behavior of HLSL.
https://github.com/zygoloid edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83204
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
weliveindetail wrote:
Yes, I think I can fix it quickly
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84460
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/llvm-beanz edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79382
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/llvm-beanz updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79382
>From 762646ef1d95efa968199156b52a60c3472a7611 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Bieneman
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 15:37:50 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] [HLSL] Pass arrays by value
HLSL constant sized array
@@ -26996,18 +26996,38 @@ class, structure, array, or other object.
Arguments:
""
-The ``llvm.objectsize`` intrinsic takes four arguments. The first argument is a
-pointer to or into the ``object``. The second argument determines whether
-``llvm.objectsize`` returns 0
vvereschaka wrote:
@weliveindetail ,
the
`Clang-Unit::ClangReplInterpreterTests.exe/InterpreterExtensionsTest/ExecutorCreateReset`
gets failed on the Clang Windows buidler
*
@@ -26996,18 +26996,38 @@ class, structure, array, or other object.
Arguments:
""
-The ``llvm.objectsize`` intrinsic takes four arguments. The first argument is a
-pointer to or into the ``object``. The second argument determines whether
-``llvm.objectsize`` returns 0
https://github.com/Zonotora updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75481
>From f0f02479736548a72c8a35ca3fea067b02e66bfd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zonotora
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 19:33:21 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang] Extract negativity check lambda to function
---
https://github.com/Zonotora updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75481
>From cd64144a4cf18adba1494871bfd9da1b0bf0a489 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zonotora
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 19:33:21 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang] Extract negativity check lambda to function
---
Sirraide wrote:
Just requested more reviews real quick because this has been open for a month
now, and Corentin apparently won’t be able to review prs until April, and I’d
also feel a bit bad if I kept pinging just him about this over and over again...
Endilll wrote:
> This is an early PR to solicit comments on the overall approach and a number
> of outstanding questions.
You should advertise this elsewhere (e.g. in RFC thread), or remove the draft
status so that reviewers can see this as something they should provide feedback
on.
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good to me. Thank you for putting new functions in all
the right places!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84983
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/dougsonos converted_to_draft
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84983
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Sirraide wrote:
Alright, just checking that the AST dump doesn’t contain
`FloatingRealToComplex` seems to work pretty well.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83063
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/dougsonos edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84983
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Sirraide updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83063
>From 5418bec794ad1df54f49a1c8d317a75d56290239 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sirraide
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 19:53:42 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Clang] [Sema] Remove incorrect int-to-complex-float
conversion
@@ -6488,6 +6488,9 @@ defm stack_arrays : BoolOptionWithoutMarshalling<"f",
"stack-arrays",
defm loop_versioning : BoolOptionWithoutMarshalling<"f",
"version-loops-for-stride",
PosFlag,
NegFlag>;
+
+def fcuda : Flag<["-"], "fcuda">, Group,
clementval
https://github.com/clementval deleted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84944
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/clementval updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84944
>From e42e8fe7f1dfe503a6735ef76e9d6483f5c9b5ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Valentin Clement
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:33:17 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [flang][cuda] Add -fcuda option
---
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff ad23127222fe23e28ac3deaa16f3ae64d13b7b6f
2a1b0d2d99c9bc4595dfc98f250bf43d23a28093 --
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules
Author: Doug Wyatt (dougsonos)
Changes
Rough first draft. This is an early PR to solicit comments on the overall
approach and a number of outstanding questions. Some of the larger ones,
"earlier" in the flow (from parse - Sema):
- Does
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Doug Wyatt (dougsonos)
Changes
Rough first draft. This is an early PR to solicit comments on the overall
approach and a number of outstanding questions. Some of the larger ones,
"earlier" in the flow (from parse - Sema):
- Does the
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you,
vsapsai wrote:
> Sometimes it does confuse clang, at least I saw problems with a `typedef
> enum` when I made an include-once header `textual`.
Ok, I see. I would just consider it a bug, not a design decision.
> That's correct. `#import` is an external source - often it comes from the
>
https://github.com/Sirraide updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84981
>From b60ff0c29f367306beb5ea0965dfaf5b7f361654 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sirraide
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 13:53:34 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang] [CodeGen] Fix codegen bug in constant
initialisation in
https://github.com/Sirraide updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84981
>From b60ff0c29f367306beb5ea0965dfaf5b7f361654 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sirraide
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 13:53:34 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] [CodeGen] Fix codegen bug in constant
initialisation in
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: None (Sirraide)
Changes
Consider the following code:
```c
bool const inf = (1.0/0.0);
```
When trying to emit the initialiser of this variable in C23, we end up hitting
a code path in codegen in `VarDecl::evaluateValueImpl()`
https://github.com/Sirraide created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84981
Consider the following code:
```c
bool const inf = (1.0/0.0);
```
When trying to emit the initialiser of this variable in C23, we end up hitting
a code path in codegen in `VarDecl::evaluateValueImpl()` where
Author: Daniel Thornburgh
Date: 2024-03-12T13:33:12-07:00
New Revision: 2377beba8d10ce1092db7f8ddd5b10a2c0d3bfd1
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2377beba8d10ce1092db7f8ddd5b10a2c0d3bfd1
DIFF:
kees wrote:
> That one ends up not being a problem, but presumably you are wanting to
> change that top-level 'struct' to be a 'union'?
No, I want to collapse the entire macro into just `TYPE NAME[]`. Right now the
Linux kernel uses the `DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY` macro _in_ over 200 unions and
yonghong-song wrote:
@efriedma-quic Thanks for your comments. BPF llvm backend and kernel BPF jit
try to make BPF<->other_architecture compatible. riscv started to support BPF
starting in 2020 and probably BPF has limited usage so the bug is exposed until
now.
Yes,
https://github.com/eddyz87 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84410
>From 1cb6905e726b1f6c6cb71ea1e4d9ab4405aedeaf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eduard Zingerman
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 04:18:32 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [BPF] Add addr_space_cast BPF instruction
addr_space_cast
@@ -6488,6 +6488,9 @@ defm stack_arrays : BoolOptionWithoutMarshalling<"f",
"stack-arrays",
defm loop_versioning : BoolOptionWithoutMarshalling<"f",
"version-loops-for-stride",
PosFlag,
NegFlag>;
+
+def fcuda : Flag<["-"], "fcuda">, Group,
clementval
https://github.com/clementval edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84944
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+! Test -fcuda option
+! RUN: %flang -fc1 -cpp -fcuda -fdebug-unparse %s -o - | FileCheck %s
clementval wrote:
Without it, it would just fail during parsing. Do you want a test that check
the failure?
urnathan wrote:
@rjmccall here's a refactoring along the lines you suggested. Once one stops
worrying about rescanning when the next access unit fails to accumulate into
the current one, things get simpler. The compiler should be able to turn the
boolean conditional flow within the loop body
https://github.com/cyndyishida closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84960
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Cyndy Ishida
Date: 2024-03-12T12:37:17-07:00
New Revision: a38b7a432d3cbb093af9310eba5b4982dc0a0243
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a38b7a432d3cbb093af9310eba5b4982dc0a0243
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a38b7a432d3cbb093af9310eba5b4982dc0a0243.diff
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -O0 -emit-llvm -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown -o - |
FileCheck %s --check-prefix=X86
+
+// Check that for 'F _Complex + int' (F = real floating-point type), we emit an
+// implicit cast from 'int' to 'F', but NOT to 'F _Complex' (i.e.
https://github.com/ributzka approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84960
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -O0 -emit-llvm -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown -o - |
FileCheck %s --check-prefix=X86
+
+// Check that for 'F _Complex + int' (F = real floating-point type), we emit an
+// implicit cast from 'int' to 'F', but NOT to 'F _Complex' (i.e.
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 4
+; RUN: opt --bpf-check-and-opt-ir -S -mtriple=bpf-pc-linux < %s | FileCheck %s
+
+; Generated from the following C code:
+;
+; extern int __uptr *magic1();
+;
https://github.com/eddyz87 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84410
>From 503c1abc8dd63ec1500d1ed867a4bfefc1aed062 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eduard Zingerman
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 04:18:32 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [BPF] Add addr_space_cast BPF instruction
This commit
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+! Test -fcuda option
+! RUN: %flang -fc1 -cpp -fcuda -fdebug-unparse %s -o - | FileCheck %s
banach-space wrote:
Could you add a RUN line without enabling CUDA? Otherwise it's hard to see
what's being tested and what the impact of enabling CUDA
@@ -6488,6 +6488,9 @@ defm stack_arrays : BoolOptionWithoutMarshalling<"f",
"stack-arrays",
defm loop_versioning : BoolOptionWithoutMarshalling<"f",
"version-loops-for-stride",
PosFlag,
NegFlag>;
+
+def fcuda : Flag<["-"], "fcuda">, Group,
banach-space
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Balazs Benics (steakhal)
Changes
Made by following:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83585#issuecomment-1980340866
Thanks for the details Tomek!
---
Full diff:
https://github.com/steakhal created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84972
Made by following:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83585#issuecomment-1980340866
Thanks for the details Tomek!
>From 9860dad609c8a27dfaa178af5b72285e3ad050fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Balazs
https://github.com/topperc updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83896
>From f22a5cd30f77b2043f9c1f7f4482fad87fb79250 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Craig Topper
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 11:24:34 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [RISCV] Add back SiFive's cdiscard.d.l1 and cflush.d.l1
https://github.com/topperc updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83896
>From 9434f834c4d48559aeec94403c927f48b15763e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Craig Topper
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 11:24:34 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [RISCV] Add back SiFive's cdiscard.d.l1 and cflush.d.l1
@@ -165,20 +165,20 @@ void
UnusedReturnValueCheck::storeOptions(ClangTidyOptions::OptionMap ) {
void UnusedReturnValueCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
auto MatchedDirectCallExpr = expr(
- callExpr(
- callee(functionDecl(
- // Don't
101 - 200 of 477 matches
Mail list logo
