kparzysz wrote:
I suspect this was a mistake, let me know if you intended to use the existing
directive here.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85217
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/kparzysz created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85217
…ctive
The function `ActOnOpenMPTargetParallelForSimdDirective` gets the number of
capture levels for OMPD_target_parallel_for, whereas the intended directive is
OMPD_target_parallel_for_simd.
>From
https://github.com/Long5hot deleted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77732
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -337,12 +347,58 @@ CharUnits
PPC32_SVR4_ABIInfo::getParamTypeAlignment(QualType Ty) const {
return CharUnits::fromQuantity(4);
}
+ABIArgInfo PPC32_SVR4_ABIInfo::handleComplex(uint64_t ) const {
+ llvm::Type *ElemTy;
+ unsigned RegsNeeded; // Registers Needed for
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Balazs Benics (steakhal)
Changes
Inside the ExprEngine when we process the initializers, we create a
PostInitializer program-point, which will refer to the field being initialized,
see `FieldLoc` inside
https://github.com/steakhal created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85211
Inside the ExprEngine when we process the initializers, we create a
PostInitializer program-point, which will refer to the field being initialized,
see `FieldLoc` inside `ExprEngine::ProcessInitializer`.
When
gigaroby wrote:
> > I think you need to run `clang/docs/tools/dump_format_help.py`.
Done.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84346
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/gigaroby updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84346
>From f65709e2a353fa19919df291d6c3a60f5e1d1bd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roberto Bampi
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 18:10:56 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-format] Add --fail-on-incomplete-format.
At the
TNorthover wrote:
Thanks. Good idea on the docs, I've added some wording and pushed the change
(4299c727e480)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85054
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/TNorthover closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85054
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Tim Northover
Date: 2024-03-14T11:32:44Z
New Revision: 4299c727e4806aa55398ad23da48a401554cd432
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4299c727e4806aa55398ad23da48a401554cd432
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4299c727e4806aa55398ad23da48a401554cd432.diff
@@ -251,13 +258,19 @@ def generate_default_conversion(src, dst, mode):
print("#endif")
-for src in types:
-for dst in types:
-generate_default_conversion(src, dst, "")
+# Do not generate default conversion for clspv as they are handle natively
@@ -307,8 +320,8 @@ def generate_saturated_conversion(src, dst, size):
# Conversion from float to int
print(
""" {DST}{N} y = convert_{DST}{N}(x);
- y = select(y, ({DST}{N}){DST_MIN}, {BP}(x < ({SRC}{N}){DST_MIN}){BS});
- y = select(y,
@@ -484,4 +536,8 @@ def generate_float_conversion(src, dst, size, mode, sat):
for dst in float_types:
for size in vector_sizes:
for mode in rounding_modes:
+# Do not generate "_rte" conversion for clspv as they are
+#
@@ -26,6 +27,12 @@
#
# convert_<_sat><_roundingMode>()
+import sys
+
+clspv = False
+if len(sys.argv) == 2 and sys.argv[1] == "--clspv":
+clspv = True
+
kpet wrote:
```suggestion
import argparse
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
@@ -251,13 +258,19 @@ def generate_default_conversion(src, dst, mode):
print("#endif")
-for src in types:
-for dst in types:
-generate_default_conversion(src, dst, "")
+# Do not generate default conversion for clspv as they are handle natively
+if not
ganeshgit wrote:
> This patch needs to be cleanly rebased on trunk (force push is OK in PR
> branchs)
I think my overnight rebase scripts screwed the fixups. I will close this and I
will raise a new pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85033
https://github.com/Stylie777 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85203
>From 276e3421de7ebe2e2a9a2feb02d585bf3d4e8915 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jack Styles
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 10:43:22 +
Subject: [PATCH] [AArch64] Remove Automatic Enablement of FEAT_F32MM
When `+sve`
alexfh wrote:
It turns out debug build of clang before this patch generated an assertion on
the original code as well:
```
assert.h assertion failed at llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp:15739
in bool clang::Expr::EvaluateAsConstantExpr(EvalResult &, const ASTContext &,
jcsxky wrote:
> Please add a more useful PR description, since that's useful for reviewers
> and ends up in the git log.
Thanks for your remind! I am waiting for CI to finish and after that I will add
the description. Maybe mark it with draft would be better.
https://github.com/rjodinchr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66902
>From 8d2b49e198feb8ec3d836b871178b14c161c4d5d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Romaric Jodin
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 09:30:09 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] libclc: clspv: update gen_convert.cl for clspv
Add a clspv
https://github.com/rjodinchr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66902
>From a6146bbc90d198d62d516bf09a41034f36f7866c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Romaric Jodin
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 09:30:09 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] libclc: clspv: update gen_convert.cl for clspv
Add a clspv
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: Python code formatter, darker found issues in your code. :warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
darker --check --diff -r
0f1847cb2c5462a09d65a9b5ac24904ac3c15a0f...5614f89c90cf865c88fbcf95d707e34dfeb18a19
https://github.com/Long5hot edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77732
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -337,12 +347,58 @@ CharUnits
PPC32_SVR4_ABIInfo::getParamTypeAlignment(QualType Ty) const {
return CharUnits::fromQuantity(4);
}
+ABIArgInfo PPC32_SVR4_ABIInfo::handleComplex(uint64_t ) const {
+ llvm::Type *ElemTy;
+ unsigned RegsNeeded; // Registers Needed for
https://github.com/rjodinchr edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66902
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/rjodinchr edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66902
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff afec257d369a13893b39d02bc630f9f3cec80162
b5a0ad5d4b7ab3510cd00d178da245761e34d32d --
https://github.com/rjodinchr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66902
>From 5614f89c90cf865c88fbcf95d707e34dfeb18a19 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Romaric Jodin
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 09:30:09 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] libclc: clspv: update gen_convert.cl for clspv
Add a clspv
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Jack Styles (Stylie777)
Changes
When `+sve` is passed in the command line, if the Architecture being targeted
is V8.6A/V9.1A or later, `+f32mm` is also added. This enables FEAT_32MM,
however at the time of writing no CPU's support
https://github.com/Stylie777 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85203
When `+sve` is passed in the command line, if the Architecture being targeted
is V8.6A/V9.1A or later, `+f32mm` is also added. This enables FEAT_32MM,
however at the time of writing no CPU's support this.
https://github.com/al45tair updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85092
>From 527aa4616dc53f8f7ca212472fa40c23f40b6dc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alastair Houghton
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 11:33:32 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] Prioritise built-in headers, even on musl.
https://github.com/ecnelises edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85040
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ecnelises edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85040
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ecnelises updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85040
>From 4977659b16a7f220e1a738a0b9841102fe9f1d07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qiu Chaofan
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:46:51 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [PowerPC] Fix behavior of rldimi/rlwimi/rlwnm builtins
rldimi
https://github.com/RKSimon requested changes to this pull request.
This patch needs to be cleanly rebased on trunk (force push is OK in PR branchs)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85033
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
alexfh wrote:
I guess the reduction could have dropped some important parts of this. Let me
try the original code with assertions-enabled clang build...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83997
___
cfe-commits mailing list
tbaederr wrote:
Please add a more useful PR description, since that's useful for reviewers and
ends up in the git log.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85198
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
nemanjai wrote:
Ah, I missed the fact that there is an option `-riscv-add-build-attributes`
that the clang driver passes when invoking `cc1as`. Perhaps that option should
default to `true`? Thanks and sorry for the noise.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85063
https://github.com/nemanjai closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85063
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
al45tair wrote:
Regardless of who provides them, if someone is relying on this then this is the
wrong change. Closing.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85089
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/al45tair closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85089
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -74,6 +74,21 @@ let TargetPrefix = "riscv" in {
} // TargetPrefix = "riscv"
+let TargetPrefix = "riscv" in {
+ // Zicsr
+ def int_riscv_csrr :
+DefaultAttrsIntrinsic<[llvm_i32_ty], [llvm_i32_ty],
+ [IntrNoMem, IntrHasSideEffects,
ImmArg>]>;
Fznamznon wrote:
> I looked at this a bit and the change that increases the constexpr
> restrictions is that ext_defaulted_comparison_constexpr_mismatch (which was
> added in https://reviews.llvm.org/D146090) became
> err_incorrect_defaulted_comparison_constexpr?
Yes, it was intentional
@@ -20,6 +20,12 @@ class RISCVBuiltin :
TargetBuiltin {
let Attributes = [NoThrow, Const] in {
//===--===//
+// Zicsr extension.
nemanjai wrote:
> I have always been unconvinced that these are a good idea to have / add
> significant value over using inline assembly. IIRC Arm has them but nobody
> uses them?
Is this a comment about the general concept of builtins to produce specific
instructions or about these specific
https://github.com/huangjd updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81545
>From f2c82758e1cba7773e41d941d2812c829c339675 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: William Huang
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 02:27:13 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Add option to generate additional info for expression
martinboehme wrote:
New commit pushed with fix. I have changed the title and description of the PR
accordingly.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85072
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/martinboehme edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85072
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/martinboehme edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85072
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/martinboehme updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85072
>From 7c61dc4872a1ffba8c241aa92bd87863f585e301 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Braenne
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 08:46:06 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][dataflow] Fix `getResultObjectLocation()` on
https://github.com/jcsxky updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85198
>From 23a344395180cbdcd47618e3170e72260139d4b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: huqizhi
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 16:32:36 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang][Sema] Fix issue on requires expression with templated
base
@@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ struct ImplicitConversionData {
const TypeDescriptor
const TypeDescriptor
/* ImplicitConversionCheckKind */ unsigned char Kind;
+ unsigned int BitfieldBits;
Zonotora wrote:
@zygoloid
https://github.com/jcsxky created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85198
None
>From 8925332a806b171bf2e12a7beb257ea85bd0a668 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: huqizhi
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 16:32:36 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang][Sema] Fix issue on requires expression with templated
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+// RUN: %clang -fsanitize=implicit-bitfield-conversion -target x86_64-linux -S
-emit-llvm -o - %s | FileCheck %s
--check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-BITFIELD-CONVERSION
Zonotora wrote:
I will add some testcases later today!
martinboehme wrote:
The new test now does actually also fail for me locally. Not sure why I didn't
notice this before. Will add a fix.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85072
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -517,13 +517,13 @@ bool BPFCheckAndAdjustIR::insertASpaceCasts(Module ) {
Changed |= !CastsCache.empty();
}
// Merge all globals within same address space into single
- // .arena. section
+ // .address_space. section
for (GlobalVariable : M.globals()) {
https://github.com/eddyz87 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85161
>From ab31efc46153f7065b186b37e406d72188c4f780 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eduard Zingerman
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:56:18 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [BPF] rename 'arena' to 'address_space'
There are a few
vitalybuka wrote:
This is broken by the patch
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/5/builds/41773/steps/9/logs/stdio
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67999
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/davemgreen commented:
Hi - I think this looks sensible, considering that long double == fp128. Should
we be doing the same for other OS's in this file too?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85070
___
cfe-commits mailing
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@huang-me Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into
the LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested
by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a problem with
a
Author: huang-me
Date: 2024-03-14T09:16:40+01:00
New Revision: 8f68022f8e6e54d1aeae4ed301f5a015963089b7
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8f68022f8e6e54d1aeae4ed301f5a015963089b7
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8f68022f8e6e54d1aeae4ed301f5a015963089b7.diff
https://github.com/steakhal closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82089
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
martinboehme wrote:
The newly added test is failing, but apparently only on Windows. Will need to
take a closer look at why this is, and will update this PR when I have
something new.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85072
___
cfe-commits
T-Gruber wrote:
Thanks again @steakhal! This is helpful and interesting background information.
I really appreciate your help!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85104
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/wangpc-pp updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76357
>From 8dc42f5c90ba369a145868f8c1a9a8cb3e988cb0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: wangpc
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2023 18:52:36 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [RISCV] Support RISC-V Profiles in -march option
This PR
@@ -854,6 +895,30 @@ RISCVISAInfo::parseArchString(StringRef Arch, bool
EnableExperimentalExtension,
"string must be lowercase");
}
+ bool IsProfile = Arch.starts_with("rvi") || Arch.starts_with("rva") ||
+
https://github.com/arsenm requested changes to this pull request.
Outstanding comments
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79236
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/phoebewang approved this pull request.
Looks great, thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83447
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2024-03-14T15:07:08+08:00
New Revision: 2582965c160486f9e3b0680f1cebc5ffdef9620c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2582965c160486f9e3b0680f1cebc5ffdef9620c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2582965c160486f9e3b0680f1cebc5ffdef9620c.diff
https://github.com/wangpc-pp updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76357
>From 8dc42f5c90ba369a145868f8c1a9a8cb3e988cb0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: wangpc
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2023 18:52:36 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [RISCV] Support RISC-V Profiles in -march option
This PR
nemanjai wrote:
> > Individual implementations will provide different sets of CSR's and need a
> > way to read/write them. Of course, this can be done with inline asm, but
> > doing such things with inline asm has its limitations (no error checking,
>
> Wouldn't the assembler error check the
https://github.com/steakhal updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82089
>From 2802ef4b9ed88da3cacb16ab7738907ee806 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: huang-me
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2024 10:43:48 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] Fix crash on StaticAnalyzer loop unrolling
---
https://github.com/steakhal updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82089
>From 2802ef4b9ed88da3cacb16ab7738907ee806 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: huang-me
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2024 10:43:48 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] Fix crash on StaticAnalyzer loop unrolling
---
steakhal wrote:
> Hello @steakhal, I have just looked through the changes again. What is the
> advantage of using checkPreCall instead of checkLocation? I would very much
> appreciate some background information. Thanks for your help!
Oh yes, I should have explained.
So, `checkLocation` can
@@ -439,82 +444,194 @@
CGRecordLowering::accumulateBitFields(RecordDecl::field_iterator Field,
Members.push_back(MemberInfo(bitsToCharUnits(StartBitOffset),
MemberInfo::Field, nullptr, *Field));
}
-return;
+return Field;
@@ -439,82 +444,194 @@
CGRecordLowering::accumulateBitFields(RecordDecl::field_iterator Field,
Members.push_back(MemberInfo(bitsToCharUnits(StartBitOffset),
MemberInfo::Field, nullptr, *Field));
}
-return;
+return Field;
https://github.com/rjmccall edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65742
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -439,82 +444,194 @@
CGRecordLowering::accumulateBitFields(RecordDecl::field_iterator Field,
Members.push_back(MemberInfo(bitsToCharUnits(StartBitOffset),
MemberInfo::Field, nullptr, *Field));
}
-return;
+return Field;
@@ -439,82 +444,194 @@
CGRecordLowering::accumulateBitFields(RecordDecl::field_iterator Field,
Members.push_back(MemberInfo(bitsToCharUnits(StartBitOffset),
MemberInfo::Field, nullptr, *Field));
}
-return;
+return Field;
@@ -439,82 +444,194 @@
CGRecordLowering::accumulateBitFields(RecordDecl::field_iterator Field,
Members.push_back(MemberInfo(bitsToCharUnits(StartBitOffset),
MemberInfo::Field, nullptr, *Field));
}
-return;
+return Field;
@@ -439,82 +444,194 @@
CGRecordLowering::accumulateBitFields(RecordDecl::field_iterator Field,
Members.push_back(MemberInfo(bitsToCharUnits(StartBitOffset),
MemberInfo::Field, nullptr, *Field));
}
-return;
+return Field;
@@ -439,82 +444,194 @@
CGRecordLowering::accumulateBitFields(RecordDecl::field_iterator Field,
Members.push_back(MemberInfo(bitsToCharUnits(StartBitOffset),
MemberInfo::Field, nullptr, *Field));
}
-return;
+return Field;
@@ -439,82 +444,194 @@
CGRecordLowering::accumulateBitFields(RecordDecl::field_iterator Field,
Members.push_back(MemberInfo(bitsToCharUnits(StartBitOffset),
MemberInfo::Field, nullptr, *Field));
}
-return;
+return Field;
https://github.com/rjmccall commented:
Thank you, the structure looks great! Mostly style and clarity comments from
here.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65742
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
tbaederr wrote:
> Sorry, I thought you were still doing some investigation.
Ah, sorry, I was just trying to say that this is how far I'm going to
investigate at that point. :)
> I can live with either approach; the
https://github.com/jcsxky closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84671
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Qizhi Hu
Date: 2024-03-14T14:24:27+08:00
New Revision: 3b5e7c83a6e226d5bd7ed2e9b67449b64812074c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3b5e7c83a6e226d5bd7ed2e9b67449b64812074c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3b5e7c83a6e226d5bd7ed2e9b67449b64812074c.diff
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -28,11 +28,26 @@ class Block;
class DeadBlock;
class Pointer;
class Context;
+template class Integral;
enum PrimType : unsigned;
class Pointer;
inline llvm::raw_ostream <<(llvm::raw_ostream ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?B=C3=A4der?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?B=C3=A4der?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -53,6 +57,10 @@ class FunctionPointer final {
return toAPValue().getAsString(Ctx, Func->getDecl()->getType());
}
+ uint32_t getIntegerRepresentation() const {
+return
401 - 490 of 490 matches
Mail list logo
