https://github.com/usx95 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85398
>From 0654f624b3b60026398e8b0168623a85e3129630 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Utkarsh Saxena
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 13:19:36 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [codegen] Emit cleanups for branch in stmt-expr and coro
@@ -51,6 +51,11 @@ struct A { ~A(); };
}
namespace test5 {
+struct A { ~A(); };
+[[clang::always_destroy]] A a; // no warning
+}
+
AaronBallman wrote:
```suggestion
struct A { ~A(); };
[[clang::always_destroy]] A a; // no warning
void func() {
https://github.com/tahonermann closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85529
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86486
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
Thank you for the fix! I have another suggested test case, and please be sure
to add a release note to clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst so users know about the
fix. Also, I think AttrDocs.td should be updated to document the fact that
`always_destroy`
Author: Tom Honermann
Date: 2024-03-25T10:39:05-04:00
New Revision: bea17ff652bc49b2de8d6be04f77d28170a78be9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bea17ff652bc49b2de8d6be04f77d28170a78be9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bea17ff652bc49b2de8d6be04f77d28170a78be9.diff
https://github.com/usx95 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85398
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86486
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86486
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
I didn't look too hard at the codegen bits, but the Expr bits look good to me.
Perhaps we want this test to live in CodeGen rather than CodeGenCoroutines
given that it covers so many non-coroutine test cases as well?
https://github.com/steakhal closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84823
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Balazs Benics
Date: 2024-03-25T15:24:03+01:00
New Revision: 32b828306e346bc8e86c0b763f3514329de60ed1
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/32b828306e346bc8e86c0b763f3514329de60ed1
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/32b828306e346bc8e86c0b763f3514329de60ed1.diff
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the Python code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85398
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85398
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/llvm-beanz closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86323
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Chris B
Date: 2024-03-25T09:16:18-05:00
New Revision: ded6252dfd96ee8904b6d2250bc9e4841ca5c802
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ded6252dfd96ee8904b6d2250bc9e4841ca5c802
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ded6252dfd96ee8904b6d2250bc9e4841ca5c802.diff
LOG:
ycdtosa wrote:
@AaronBallman I finally got some time to prepare this PR, but I am not familiar
with the approval process.
It also seems that you have commit rights, so there!
Still, I fell the test might be incomplete.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86486
https://github.com/usx95 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85398
>From 0654f624b3b60026398e8b0168623a85e3129630 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Utkarsh Saxena
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 13:19:36 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [codegen] Emit cleanups for branch in stmt-expr and coro
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -1295,11 +1295,13 @@
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -1295,11 +1295,13 @@ double4 trunc(double4);
/// true, across
https://github.com/usx95 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85398
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2503,6 +2505,26 @@ Stmt *BlockExpr::getBody() {
// Generic Expression Routines
//===--===//
+bool Expr::mayBranchOut() const {
+ struct BranchDetector : public RecursiveASTVisitor {
+bool HasBranch
@@ -2503,6 +2505,26 @@ Stmt *BlockExpr::getBody() {
// Generic Expression Routines
//===--===//
+bool Expr::mayBranchOut() const {
+ struct BranchDetector : public RecursiveASTVisitor {
+bool HasBranch
@@ -2503,6 +2505,26 @@ Stmt *BlockExpr::getBody() {
// Generic Expression Routines
//===--===//
+bool Expr::mayBranchOut() const {
+ struct BranchDetector : public RecursiveASTVisitor {
+bool HasBranch
llvm-beanz wrote:
Philosophically I agree with this change, but I think some subprojects may need
to adopt specific policies about how they handle files that are expected to be
specific line endings. Specifically, Clang needs testing that verifies correct
behavior on both CRLF and LF files in
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Zahira Ammarguellat (zahiraam)
Changes
Fixed the printing of templated argument list and added test case.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86339.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/TypePrinter.cpp
ldrumm wrote:
On Mon Mar 25, 2024 at 1:48 PM GMT, Tobias Hieta wrote:
> > I think .natvis files should be CRLF (those are used with Visual Studio for
> > debug visualizers).
>
> Agreed, Visual Studio should handle this correctly, but who knows
> 路
>
Thanks. I'll add a rule and update
https://github.com/zahiraam ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86339
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2503,6 +2505,26 @@ Stmt *BlockExpr::getBody() {
// Generic Expression Routines
//===--===//
+bool Expr::mayBranchOut() const {
+ struct BranchDetector : public RecursiveASTVisitor {
+bool HasBranch
Abhinkop wrote:
> Hi @Abhinkop! I was wondering if there was any progress regarding the patch
> to resolve the stage 2 failure, as our bot is still red
> (https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/36/builds/43929/steps/12/logs/stdio).
> Please let me know if you would also like me to test any
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+.. title:: clang-tidy - bugprone-exception-rethrow
+
+bugprone-exception-rethrow
+==
+
+Identifies problematic exception rethrowing, especially with caught exception
+variables or empty throw statements outside catch blocks.
+
+In C++
@@ -5061,11 +5061,15 @@ void Parser::ParseMicrosoftAttributes(ParsedAttributes
) {
IdentifierInfo *II = Tok.getIdentifierInfo();
SourceLocation NameLoc = Tok.getLocation();
ConsumeToken();
-ParsedAttr::Kind AttrKind =
-
tru wrote:
> I think .natvis files should be CRLF (those are used with Visual Studio for
> debug visualizers).
Agreed, Visual Studio should handle this correctly, but who knows 路
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86318
___
cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
LGTM but this should be testable because `getAsString()` uses `printPretty()`:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/e6f63a942a45e3545332cd9a43982a69a4d5667b/clang/lib/AST/Interp/FunctionPointer.h#L53,
https://github.com/llvm-beanz approved this pull request.
Nice catch! Thank you!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86407
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
amy-kwan wrote:
Hi @Abhinkop!
I was wondering if there was any progress regarding the patch to resolve the
stage 2 failure, as our bot is still red
(https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/36/builds/43929/steps/12/logs/stdio).
Please let me know if you would also like me to test any patches,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -2218,6 +2238,14 @@ inline bool GetFnPtr(InterpState , CodePtr OpPC, const
Function *Func) {
return true;
}
+template
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -199,6 +207,41 @@ bool ByteCodeExprGen::VisitCastExpr(const
CastExpr *CE) {
return true;
}
+ case
Timm =?utf-8?q?B=C3=A4der?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?B=C3=A4der?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?B=C3=A4der?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?B=C3=A4der?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?B=C3=A4der?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -1912,6 +1929,10 @@ inline bool NoRet(InterpState , CodePtr OpPC) {
inline bool
Timm =?utf-8?q?B=C3=A4der?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?B=C3=A4der?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?B=C3=A4der?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?B=C3=A4der?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?B=C3=A4der?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
Basically LGTM, just a few minor things.
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84159
___
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
Splitting the code across a few implementation files might be a reasonable
approach, but in general, I'm fine with how this is proceeding.
I reviewed
https://github.com/martinboehme closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86479
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: martinboehme
Date: 2024-03-25T14:08:25+01:00
New Revision: e6f63a942a45e3545332cd9a43982a69a4d5667b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e6f63a942a45e3545332cd9a43982a69a4d5667b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e6f63a942a45e3545332cd9a43982a69a4d5667b.diff
egorzhdan wrote:
@compnerd I think I addressed all of your comments, let me know if this is good
to go!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84773
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -2503,6 +2505,26 @@ Stmt *BlockExpr::getBody() {
// Generic Expression Routines
//===--===//
+bool Expr::mayBranchOut() const {
+ struct BranchDetector : public RecursiveASTVisitor {
+bool HasBranch
@@ -2503,6 +2505,26 @@ Stmt *BlockExpr::getBody() {
// Generic Expression Routines
//===--===//
+bool Expr::mayBranchOut() const {
+ struct BranchDetector : public RecursiveASTVisitor {
+bool HasBranch
@@ -2503,6 +2505,26 @@ Stmt *BlockExpr::getBody() {
// Generic Expression Routines
//===--===//
+bool Expr::mayBranchOut() const {
+ struct BranchDetector : public RecursiveASTVisitor {
+bool HasBranch
@@ -2503,6 +2505,26 @@ Stmt *BlockExpr::getBody() {
// Generic Expression Routines
//===--===//
+bool Expr::mayBranchOut() const {
+ struct BranchDetector : public RecursiveASTVisitor {
+bool HasBranch
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85398
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
Hopefully @rjmccall or @efriedma-quic can take a look at the codegen bits. I
did have some questions about other kinds of flow control statements we might
want to cover.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85398
https://github.com/ymand approved this pull request.
Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86479
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/labrinea updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86493
>From dfef9d04c0a65423a051ac00044b39f8911aa731 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexandros Lamprineas
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 17:21:13 +
Subject: [PATCH] [FMV] Allow mixing target_version with target_clones.
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the Python code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86493
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 13078cbc3eeb0ae91c370ce0f604f7165b26e0c8
65bfc47298131d6fb5dfeed722dc3f2d9d85eadd --
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Alexandros Lamprineas (labrinea)
Changes
The latest ACLE allows it and further clarifies the following
in regards to the combination of the two attributes:
"If the `default` matches with another explicitly provided
version in the
https://github.com/labrinea created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86493
The latest ACLE allows it and further clarifies the following
in regards to the combination of the two attributes:
"If the `default` matches with another explicitly provided
version in the same translation
https://github.com/zahiraam edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86339
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zahiraam updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86339
>From ab7d280abf053b67b716e0723e2e70876e639810 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zahira Ammarguellat
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 13:55:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Fix printing of templated records.
---
@@ -21,3 +21,18 @@ empty empty_record_test(int z, ...) {
__builtin_va_start(list, z);
return __builtin_va_arg(list, empty);
}
+
CoTinker wrote:
done
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86377
___
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
The changes seem reasonable to me, but there are test failures in
`llvm/utils/lit/tests` that could perhaps be related to your changes.
I think .natvis files should be CRLF (those are used with Visual Studio for
debug visualizers).
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,NagyDonat
,NagyDonat
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/NagyDonat closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85791
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
Author: NagyDonat
Date: 2024-03-25T12:43:51+01:00
New Revision: e1d4ddb0c68f69001d7de43d9c678f4d73c1ecba
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e1d4ddb0c68f69001d7de43d9c678f4d73c1ecba
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e1d4ddb0c68f69001d7de43d9c678f4d73c1ecba.diff
https://github.com/NagyDonat approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84823
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
TIFitis wrote:
@jdoerfert @jsjodin polite ping for review.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80343
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86466
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -5674,6 +5675,11 @@ QualType getApproximateType(const Expr *E) {
return getApproximateType(VD->getInit());
}
}
+ if (const auto *UO = llvm::dyn_cast(E)) {
+if (UO->getOpcode() == UnaryOperatorKind::UO_Deref) {
zyn0217 wrote:
nit: We
https://github.com/zyn0217 approved this pull request.
Thanks. LGTM apart from one nit.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86466
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Sirraide wrote:
I’m the wrong person to ping if it’s anything codegen-related; I’ll leave
reviewing this to people more familiar w/ that part of Clang.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85398
___
cfe-commits mailing list
@@ -49,3 +49,62 @@ if ((MINGW OR CYGWIN) AND BUILD_SHARED_LIBS)
# despite potential dllexports.
target_link_options(clangInterpreter PRIVATE LINKER:--export-all-symbols)
endif()
+
+if(MSVC)
+ set_target_properties(clangInterpreter PROPERTIES WINDOWS_EXPORT_ALL_SYMBOLS
1)
=?utf-8?q?Don=C3=A1t?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Don=C3=A1t?= Nagy ,NagyDonat
,NagyDonat
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/steakhal approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85791
___
cfe-commits mailing list
Stefan =?utf-8?q?Gr=C3=A4nitz?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
jplehr wrote:
I see. Thanks for the explanation and the fix! Bot is back to green.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84461
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/iains edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85050
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -3031,6 +3032,11 @@ defm skip_odr_check_in_gmf : BoolOption<"f",
"skip-odr-check-in-gmf",
"Perform ODR checks for decls in the global module fragment.">>,
Group;
+def gen_reduced_bmi : Flag<["-"], "fgen-reduced-bmi">,
iains wrote:
If this is
https://github.com/iains commented:
I have no issue with the general intention or phasing here; my main concern is
that we are introducing [yet] another user-facing modules option that actually
we intend will become irrelevant after a few releases.
In practice, removing user-facing options
weliveindetail wrote:
We do need the target and not just the symbols. It could be any non-native
target, but implementing a selection mechanism isn't worth the effort. We just
try ARM and (with my above patch) otherwise skip the test.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84461
Author: Stefan Gränitz
Date: 2024-03-25T11:50:21+01:00
New Revision: 13078cbc3eeb0ae91c370ce0f604f7165b26e0c8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/13078cbc3eeb0ae91c370ce0f604f7165b26e0c8
DIFF:
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the Python code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85497
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -1483,9 +1483,18 @@ llvm::json::Value toJSON(const InlayHintKind ) {
llvm_unreachable("Unknown clang.clangd.InlayHintKind");
}
+namespace {
+
+llvm::json::Array toJSON(const std::vector ) {
+ return llvm::json::Array{
+ llvm::map_range(Labels, [](auto ) { return
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85497
>From 6d61aa1e43bb522412904bdd77c7f1cfc4b42889 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 12:33:58 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clangd] Support go-to-definition on type hints. The
ycdtosa wrote:
this was lightly discussed in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/68686
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86486
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -49,3 +49,62 @@ if ((MINGW OR CYGWIN) AND BUILD_SHARED_LIBS)
# despite potential dllexports.
target_link_options(clangInterpreter PRIVATE LINKER:--export-all-symbols)
endif()
+
+if(MSVC)
+ set_target_properties(clangInterpreter PROPERTIES WINDOWS_EXPORT_ALL_SYMBOLS
1)
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (ycdtosa)
Changes
user wants the warning silenced by the attribute
so no warning should be issued.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86486.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you,
https://github.com/ycdtosa created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86486
user wants the warning silenced by the attribute
so no warning should be issued.
>From 016152bc21c2625db77d3e31a7123bcf08114133 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ycdtosa
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:28:02 +
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR
Stefan =?utf-8?q?Gränitz?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
jplehr wrote:
Thanks! I am quite unfamiliar with that part of the code base and wonder if the
symbol needs to just exist somewhere.
The other thing used there (`InitializeNativeTargetAsmPrinter`) is declared in
`TargetSelect.h`. So, does
Keenuts wrote:
Rebases on main (almost, HEAD is slightly broken), and added back the
convergence attribute.
The backend changes are ready for this intrinsic.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80680
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/Keenuts updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80680
From afbe709931942b3970f92884022e250c1e7eb84f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Nathan=20Gau=C3=ABr?=
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 16:38:46 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [clang][HLSL][SPRI-V] Add convergence
weliveindetail wrote:
I will try this
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/release/18.x/llvm/unittests/DebugInfo/LogicalView/CodeViewReaderTest.cpp#L482
and push a quick-fix.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84461
___
cfe-commits
weliveindetail wrote:
Thanks for your note. Looks like the problem is that the ARM target is not
registered. It's an uncommon requirement for a unitttest.. Will see how to
check that at runtime. If you have an idea, let me know. Thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84461
@@ -49,3 +49,62 @@ if ((MINGW OR CYGWIN) AND BUILD_SHARED_LIBS)
# despite potential dllexports.
target_link_options(clangInterpreter PRIVATE LINKER:--export-all-symbols)
endif()
+
+if(MSVC)
+ set_target_properties(clangInterpreter PROPERTIES WINDOWS_EXPORT_ALL_SYMBOLS
1)
https://github.com/Discookie closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83985
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Discookie
Date: 2024-03-25T10:08:56Z
New Revision: 37785fedabd8fa752129ef5bac3462311af91c35
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/37785fedabd8fa752129ef5bac3462311af91c35
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/37785fedabd8fa752129ef5bac3462311af91c35.diff
LOG:
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,NagyDonat
,NagyDonat
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/NagyDonat updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85791
>From 3fbc8da42726aa63ad0aef7ba12141125197279b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Don=C3=A1t=20Nagy?=
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,NagyDonat
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -1435,9 +1440,17 @@ void MallocChecker::checkGMallocN0(const CallEvent ,
C.addTransition(State);
}
+static bool isFromStdNamespace(const CallEvent ) {
+ const Decl *FD =
@@ -367,7 +367,13 @@ class Checker {
auto Hints = inlayHints(*AST, LineRange);
for (const auto : Hints) {
- vlog(" {0} {1} {2}", Hint.kind, Hint.position, Hint.label);
+ vlog(" {0} {1} [{2}]", Hint.kind, Hint.position, [&] {
+return
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84823
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the Python code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84823
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
wangpc-pp wrote:
Windows CI is passed now, many thanks to @AaronBallman @vgvassilev!
I may land this in a few days if there is no more comment. :-)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83774
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
301 - 400 of 455 matches
Mail list logo
