AaronBallman wrote:
I think the former diagnostic is more clear. It seems the issue is around here:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/d7975c9d93fb4a69c0bd79d7d5b3f6be77a25c73/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp#L2828
We changed the `DeclSpecContext` so we hit the `else if` rather than the
https://github.com/farzonl approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86932
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cjacek wrote:
Sounds good to me, the new version uses `-marm64x` flag instead. Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86835
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/aabysswalker edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86932
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1127,9 +1148,9 @@ NumericLiteralParser::NumericLiteralParser(StringRef
TokSpelling,
// wb and WB are allowed, but a mixture of cases like Wb or wB is not. We
// explicitly do not support the suffix in C++ as an extension because a
// library-based UDL
https://github.com/cjacek updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86835
>From 7a4a69076b2172e50ce305f97e0f97f67d00aa32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacek Caban
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:58:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][Driver] Pass -machine argument to the linker
explicitly
jyknight wrote:
+1 on the high-level plan. Switching from a linear offset to a
{local-module-index, offset-within-module} pair sounds great!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86912
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/js324 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86586
>From 1b0902aa9f8a07771f29fb21d7b4cdea9e966118 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jin S
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:19:41 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [BitInt] Expose a _BitInt literal suffix in C++
---
@@ -2177,7 +2177,8 @@ struct CounterCoverageMappingBuilder
}
void VisitOpaqueValueExpr(const OpaqueValueExpr* OVE) {
-Visit(OVE->getSourceExpr());
+if (const Expr *SE = OVE->getSourceExpr())
bolshakov-a wrote:
Not all `OpaqueValueExpr`s having a
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (NagyDonat)
Changes
The class `KnownSVal` was very magical abstract class within the `SVal` class
hierarchy: with a hacky `classof` method it acted as if it was the common
ancestor of the classes `UndefinedSVal` and `DefinedSVal`.
https://github.com/NagyDonat created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86953
The class `KnownSVal` was very magical abstract class within the `SVal` class
hierarchy: with a hacky `classof` method it acted as if it was the common
ancestor of the classes `UndefinedSVal` and
@@ -1117,6 +1118,26 @@ NumericLiteralParser::NumericLiteralParser(StringRef
TokSpelling,
if (isImaginary) break; // Cannot be repeated.
isImaginary = true;
continue; // Success.
+case '_':
+ if (isFPConstant)
+break; // Invalid for floats
https://github.com/ahatanak closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86923
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1117,6 +1118,26 @@ NumericLiteralParser::NumericLiteralParser(StringRef
TokSpelling,
if (isImaginary) break; // Cannot be repeated.
isImaginary = true;
continue; // Success.
+case '_':
+ if (isFPConstant)
+break; // Invalid for floats
alexey-bataev wrote:
> Thank you for working on this, it's definitely a complicated situation!
>
> > However, libclc appears to be using **attribute**((assume)) internally,
> > specifically, in one header that defines a macro that is then used
> > throughout the codebase. I’m not familiar
https://github.com/aabysswalker updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86932
>From caec748f3f0ab16b829f7765c5c2d87ed7f7b73f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: aabysswalker
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 12:50:25 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Prevent generating double of ceil, exp, exp2, floor.
@@ -1117,6 +1118,26 @@ NumericLiteralParser::NumericLiteralParser(StringRef
TokSpelling,
if (isImaginary) break; // Cannot be repeated.
isImaginary = true;
continue; // Success.
+case '_':
+ if (isFPConstant)
+break; // Invalid for floats
@@ -1,12 +1,13 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -triple
dxil-pc-shadermodel6.6-library %s -fnative-half-type -emit-llvm
-disable-llvm-passes -verify -DTEST_FUNC=__builtin_elementwise_cos
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -triple
@@ -1,12 +1,13 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -triple
dxil-pc-shadermodel6.6-library %s -fnative-half-type -emit-llvm
-disable-llvm-passes -verify -DTEST_FUNC=__builtin_elementwise_cos
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -triple
Sirraide wrote:
> Added @AnastasiaStulova for help with the OpenCL questions. I would love to
> avoid adding `omp_assume` if possible.
Thanks, I didn’t know who to ping about that, and yeah, same.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84934
___
https://github.com/Sirraide approved this pull request.
There’s a typo, but LGTM otherwise.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86943
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -1356,6 +1356,8 @@ NormalizedConstraint::fromConstraintExpr(Sema ,
NamedDecl *D, const Expr *E) {
S, CSE->getExprLoc(),
Sema::InstantiatingTemplate::ConstraintNormalization{}, D,
CSE->getSourceRange());
+ if (Inst.isInvalid())
+
https://github.com/Sirraide edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86943
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1836,7 +1836,19 @@ static TemplateParameterList
*GetTemplateParameterList(TemplateDecl *TD) {
// Make sure we get the template parameter list from the most
// recent declaration, since that is the only one that is guaranteed to
// have all the default template
@@ -1,12 +1,13 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -triple
dxil-pc-shadermodel6.6-library %s -fnative-half-type -emit-llvm
-disable-llvm-passes -verify -DTEST_FUNC=__builtin_elementwise_cos
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -triple
farzonl wrote:
So keep in mind there are some double cases that are valid for hlsl. so always
check via dxc which can be easily used via
[hlsl.godbolt](https://hlsl.godbolt.org/).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86932
___
cfe-commits
Keenuts wrote:
Local tests for SPIR-V & DXIL pass
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80680
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Keenuts updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80680
From dc008167980ca0a479d2cdceeeb1ab6cd4983ec3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Nathan=20Gau=C3=ABr?=
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 16:38:46 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] [clang][HLSL][SPRI-V] Add convergence
@@ -1,12 +1,13 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -triple
dxil-pc-shadermodel6.6-library %s -fnative-half-type -emit-llvm
-disable-llvm-passes -verify -DTEST_FUNC=__builtin_elementwise_cos
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -triple
farzonl wrote:
I was writing up a ticket for floor and ceil. Nice catch!
https://godbolt.org/z/q9a644e6W.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86932
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/tstellar approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86945
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/egorzhdan closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86820
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Egor Zhdan
Date: 2024-03-28T12:59:57Z
New Revision: 96c8e2e88cc68416ddce4a9bf1a9221387b6d4b3
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/96c8e2e88cc68416ddce4a9bf1a9221387b6d4b3
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/96c8e2e88cc68416ddce4a9bf1a9221387b6d4b3.diff
LOG:
Keenuts wrote:
Thanks all the the reviews! We have 3 LGTMs and an ack from Arsenm, so I'm
going to rebase on main, wait for the bots & tests, and if all is green, merge
this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80680
___
cfe-commits mailing
@@ -1130,8 +1130,92 @@ struct BitTest {
static BitTest decodeBitTestBuiltin(unsigned BuiltinID);
};
+
+// Returns the first convergence entry/loop/anchor instruction found in |BB|.
+// std::nullptr otherwise.
+llvm::IntrinsicInst *getConvergenceToken(llvm::BasicBlock *BB) {
https://github.com/Keenuts updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80680
From afbe709931942b3970f92884022e250c1e7eb84f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Nathan=20Gau=C3=ABr?=
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 16:38:46 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] [clang][HLSL][SPRI-V] Add convergence
https://github.com/VitaNuo closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86938
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: VitaNuo
Date: 2024-03-28T13:48:09+01:00
New Revision: 56a10a3c7930164a875db7c34da8c2a8b8abfbee
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/56a10a3c7930164a875db7c34da8c2a8b8abfbee
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/56a10a3c7930164a875db7c34da8c2a8b8abfbee.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/arsenm approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86945
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/frasercrmck created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86945
The libclc project is currently only properly supported as an external project.
However, when trying to get it to also build in-tree, the CMake configuration
messages it outputs stand out amongst the rest
@@ -1127,9 +1148,9 @@ NumericLiteralParser::NumericLiteralParser(StringRef
TokSpelling,
// wb and WB are allowed, but a mixture of cases like Wb or wB is not. We
// explicitly do not support the suffix in C++ as an extension because a
// library-based UDL
@@ -1117,6 +1118,26 @@ NumericLiteralParser::NumericLiteralParser(StringRef
TokSpelling,
if (isImaginary) break; // Cannot be repeated.
isImaginary = true;
continue; // Success.
+case '_':
+ if (isFPConstant)
+break; // Invalid for floats
https://github.com/ymand approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86942
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/syzaara closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86840
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Zaara Syeda
Date: 2024-03-28T08:37:25-04:00
New Revision: 4ddd4ed7fe15a356dace649e18492dd01071f475
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4ddd4ed7fe15a356dace649e18492dd01071f475
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4ddd4ed7fe15a356dace649e18492dd01071f475.diff
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
Thank you for working on this, it's definitely a complicated situation!
> However, libclc appears to be using __attribute__((assume)) internally,
> specifically, in one header that defines a macro that is then used throughout
> the codebase. I’m not
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Haojian Wu (hokein)
Changes
This is an oversight spot in #86869, we should always check the invalid
bit after constructing the `Sema::InstantiatingTemplate` RAII object.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86943.diff
https://github.com/hokein created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86943
This is an oversight spot in #86869, we should always check the invalid bit
after constructing the `Sema::InstantiatingTemplate` RAII object.
>From cb863750a7c57e76bbb8d63cc88975f5adaa65aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/ssahasra approved this pull
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/ssahasra edited
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -1130,8 +1130,92 @@ struct BitTest {
static BitTest
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -1130,8 +1130,92 @@ struct
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -1130,8 +1130,92 @@ struct BitTest {
static BitTest
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/ssahasra commented:
LGTM, with a few nits.
For the record, I
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-analysis
Author: None (martinboehme)
Changes
The constructor `Derived(int)` in the newly added test
`ClassDerivedFromOptionalValueConstructor` is not a template, and this used to
cause an assertion failure in
https://github.com/martinboehme created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86942
The constructor `Derived(int)` in the newly added test
`ClassDerivedFromOptionalValueConstructor` is not a template, and this used to
cause an assertion failure in `valueOrConversionHasValue()` because
https://github.com/kadircet approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86938
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
hokein wrote:
> LGTM, interesting it looks like we don't do this check in fromContraintExpr
> either.
Yes, I think it is an oversight, we should do the check for it as well.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86869
___
cfe-commits mailing
https://github.com/hokein closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86869
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Haojian Wu
Date: 2024-03-28T13:10:02+01:00
New Revision: a042fcbe45d1ae64acc5d818db90e26e16e1aab3
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a042fcbe45d1ae64acc5d818db90e26e16e1aab3
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a042fcbe45d1ae64acc5d818db90e26e16e1aab3.diff
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
I'm not keen on reimplementing the checking logic manually; I worry this is
going to be a slippery slope where we start with `printf` today, but then need
to do the same thing for the rest of the family at some point in the future.
Would it make
https://github.com/hokein closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84018
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Haojian Wu
Date: 2024-03-28T13:07:58+01:00
New Revision: fb8cccf88c5d04f36148ff336b6dc7c25746b1de
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fb8cccf88c5d04f36148ff336b6dc7c25746b1de
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fb8cccf88c5d04f36148ff336b6dc7c25746b1de.diff
https://github.com/Long5hot updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77732
>From 3c5fcb03ee7871a93d3163beb51133c836f58ca6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kishan Parmar
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 17:26:48 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][PowerPC] Add flag to enable compatibility with GNU
for
https://github.com/hokein updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84018
>From 63e1f39e9580f4b33fcd86572aea70bf46edb264 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Haojian Wu
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 14:50:23 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [AST] Print the "aggregate" kind for aggregate deduction
guide
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clangd
Author: None (VitaNuo)
Changes
…in milliseconds rather than seconds.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86938.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified)
https://github.com/VitaNuo created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86938
…in milliseconds rather than seconds.
>From a30c86bf1769b4c5603ec49022e24c6fcf88f199 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Viktoriia Bakalova
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 11:38:38 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clangd][trace] Fix
@@ -3717,6 +3717,16 @@ def err_sme_definition_using_za_in_non_sme_target :
Error<
"function using ZA state requires 'sme'">;
def err_sme_definition_using_zt0_in_non_sme2_target : Error<
"function using ZT0 state requires 'sme2'">;
+def
@@ -1390,6 +1390,9 @@ def MultiGPU: DiagGroup<"multi-gpu">;
// libc and the CRT to be skipped.
def AVRRtlibLinkingQuirks : DiagGroup<"avr-rtlib-linking-quirks">;
+// A warning group AArch64 related to SME function attribues.
dtemirbulatov wrote:
Done.
https://github.com/benshi001 approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86919
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-hlsl
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Andrii Levitskiy (aabysswalker)
Changes
As #86555, we should cover all of non-double builtins.
Closes #86818
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86932.diff
5 Files Affected:
- (modified)
https://github.com/aabysswalker created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86932
As #86555, we should cover all of non-double builtins.
Closes #86818
>From caec748f3f0ab16b829f7765c5c2d87ed7f7b73f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: aabysswalker
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 12:50:25 +0200
@@ -2515,6 +2517,53 @@ void CStringChecker::evalSprintfCommon(CheckerContext
, const CallEvent ,
C.addTransition(State);
}
+void CStringChecker::evalGetentropy(CheckerContext , const CallEvent )
const {
+ DestinationArgExpr Buffer = {{Call.getArgExpr(0), 0}};
+
@@ -764,6 +762,32 @@ void Flang::ConstructJob(Compilation , const JobAction
,
// Add other compile options
addOtherOptions(Args, CmdArgs);
+ // Forward flags for OpenMP. We don't do this if the current action is an
+ // device offloading action other than OpenMP.
+ if
https://github.com/aabysswalker closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86930
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (efferre79)
Changes
it's useful to know which clang library the python byndings are running
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86931.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/bindings/python/clang/cindex.py
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Andrii Levitskiy (aabysswalker)
Changes
As #86555, we should cover all of non-double builtins.
Closes #86818
---
Patch is 225.31 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86930.diff
5
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you,
https://github.com/efferre79 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86931
it's useful to know which clang library the python byndings are running
>From 05a882b276e6e6f3c8502c9e1102d575f4c49018 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: efferre79
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 11:11:21 +0100
Subject:
https://github.com/kovdan01 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84387
>From 728f5644aebfafd2114e7e47a9b83ef057423997 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 10:57:54 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] Upstream ptrauth changes to DWARFASTParserClang
---
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ def extract_result_types(comment):
def strip_doxygen(comment):
-"""Returns the given comment without \-escaped words."""
+"""Returns the given comment without \\-escaped words."""
AngryLoki wrote:
No, `'''\-'''` is still
https://github.com/martinboehme closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86675
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: martinboehme
Date: 2024-03-28T10:12:45+01:00
New Revision: 8d77d362af6ade32f087c051fe4774a3891f6ec9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8d77d362af6ade32f087c051fe4774a3891f6ec9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8d77d362af6ade32f087c051fe4774a3891f6ec9.diff
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-powerpc
Author: Akira Hatanaka (ahatanak)
Changes
To authenticate pointers, CodeGen needs access to the key and discriminators
that were used to sign the pointer. That information is sometimes known from
the context, but not always, which is
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86912
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1836,7 +1836,19 @@ static TemplateParameterList
*GetTemplateParameterList(TemplateDecl *TD) {
// Make sure we get the template parameter list from the most
// recent declaration, since that is the only one that is guaranteed to
// have all the default template
https://github.com/hokein approved this pull request.
thanks, this looks good from my side.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86914
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/hokein edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86914
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
BTW, after this patch, with reduced BMI
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85050), we can already do something
more interesting than reformating:
```
//--- A.cppm
export module A;
int funcA0();
int funcA1();
export int funcA() {
return funcA0();
}
//---
https://github.com/hokein edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86869
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
@rjmccall @dwblaikie ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75912
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Younan Zhang (zyn0217)
Changes
The most recent declaration of a template as a friend can introduce a different
template parameter depth compared to what we anticipate from a CTAD guide.
Fixes
https://github.com/zyn0217 ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86914
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hokein closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85413
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Haojian Wu
Date: 2024-03-28T09:13:26+01:00
New Revision: 63ea5a4088ff73a47cd3411fad3b42c92a3c64f0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/63ea5a4088ff73a47cd3411fad3b42c92a3c64f0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/63ea5a4088ff73a47cd3411fad3b42c92a3c64f0.diff
@@ -1990,6 +1990,18 @@ void TextNodeDumper::VisitFunctionDecl(const
FunctionDecl *D) {
}
}
+void TextNodeDumper::VisitCXXDeductionGuideDecl(const CXXDeductionGuideDecl
*D) {
+ VisitFunctionDecl(D);
+ switch (D->getDeductionCandidateKind()) {
+ case
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
@sam-mccall any updates?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66462
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -ferror-limit 0 -verify %s
hokein wrote:
This file contains many errors, the number of the errors exceeds the default
number (19) in clang, which affects the clang behavior
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Chuanqi Xu (ChuanqiXu9)
Changes
This is part of "no transitive change" patch series, "no transitive source
location change". I talked this with @Bigcheese in the tokyo's WG21
meeting.
The idea comes from @jyknight posted on LLVM
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86912
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
201 - 300 of 306 matches
Mail list logo
