ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
@sam-mccall any updates?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66462
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -ferror-limit 0 -verify %s
hokein wrote:
This file contains many errors, the number of the errors exceeds the default
number (19) in clang, which affects the clang behavior
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Chuanqi Xu (ChuanqiXu9)
Changes
This is part of "no transitive change" patch series, "no transitive source
location change". I talked this with @Bigcheese in the tokyo's WG21
meeting.
The idea comes from @jyknight posted on LLVM discours
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86912
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86912
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Balázs Kéri (balazske)
Changes
Until now function `fseek` returned nonzero on error, this is changed to -1
only. And it does not produce EOF error any more.
This complies better with the POSIX s
https://github.com/balazske created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86919
Until now function `fseek` returned nonzero on error, this is changed to -1
only. And it does not produce EOF error any more.
This complies better with the POSIX standard.
From b6c76404c2f0b0e960adcadd7f089ecc5
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86912
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
301 - 308 of 308 matches
Mail list logo