rapidsna wrote:
> This should be fine, because count is declared before use—unless I'm getting
> type attributes confused with field attributes..
`struct size_unknown *__counted_by(count) buf` indicates that `buf` has
`sizeof(struct size_unknown) * count`
https://github.com/artemcm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88152
>From c2b2cd03e1d8f92b1df814e6312158b8820b790d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Langmuir
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 11:22:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [llvm][vfs] Make vfs::FileSystem::exists() virtual NFC
Allow
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 approved this pull request.
LGTM. I assume you'll call `resetBenignCodeGenOptions()` from
`ModuleDepCollector::applyDiscoveredDependencies()` in a follow-up, non-NFC
patch, right? (So that it applies to the primary invocation, i.e. the actual
PCH.) Maybe
Author: Edwin Vane
Date: 2024-04-12T12:49:25-04:00
New Revision: 54a6798e0a3630e705ed32dbbd63414a16331085
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/54a6798e0a3630e705ed32dbbd63414a16331085
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/54a6798e0a3630e705ed32dbbd63414a16331085.diff
https://github.com/AaronBallman closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88268
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -62,6 +62,52 @@ FieldSet getObjectFields(QualType Type);
bool containsSameFields(const FieldSet ,
const RecordStorageLocation::FieldToLoc );
+/// Returns the fields of a `RecordDecl` that are initialized by an
+/// `InitListExpr`, in the order in
https://github.com/ymand approved this pull request.
Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88534
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -62,6 +62,52 @@ FieldSet getObjectFields(QualType Type);
bool containsSameFields(const FieldSet ,
const RecordStorageLocation::FieldToLoc );
+/// Returns the fields of a `RecordDecl` that are initialized by an
+/// `InitListExpr`, in the order in
https://github.com/ymand edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88534
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
danix800 wrote:
ping @Endilll
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88014
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
bazuzi wrote:
@ymand Can you review and merge?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88534
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Samira Bazuzi (bazuzi)
Changes
Exposes the collection functionality, but does not alter it beyond using a
return value instead of output parameters. Also relocates underlying and
related functions and a class from DataflowEnvironment's
https://github.com/benlangmuir approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68645
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/bazuzi created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88534
Exposes the collection functionality, but does not alter it beyond using a
return value instead of output parameters. Also relocates underlying and
related functions and a class from DataflowEnvironment's files
https://github.com/steakhal edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87787
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@shenjunjiekoda Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged
into the LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested
by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a problem with
https://github.com/steakhal closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87787
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: JOSTAR
Date: 2024-04-12T18:15:33+02:00
New Revision: 05d8b5e62d7a1cf2f94582346d6fd2d39667a26b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/05d8b5e62d7a1cf2f94582346d6fd2d39667a26b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/05d8b5e62d7a1cf2f94582346d6fd2d39667a26b.diff
LOG:
Author: Evan Wilde
Date: 2024-04-12T09:05:59-07:00
New Revision: 8d468c132eed7ffe34d601b224220efd51655eb3
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8d468c132eed7ffe34d601b224220efd51655eb3
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8d468c132eed7ffe34d601b224220efd51655eb3.diff
https://github.com/etcwilde closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88317
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -4997,7 +5087,11 @@ void Parser::ParseStructUnionBody(SourceLocation
RecordLoc,
ParsedAttributes attrs(AttrFactory);
// If attributes exist after struct contents, parse them.
- MaybeParseGNUAttributes(attrs);
+ MaybeParseGNUAttributes(attrs, );
+
+
bwendling wrote:
FYI: I'm planning on having a separate
`test/Sema/attr-counted-by-for-pointers.c` test file for pointers and rename
the current file something like
`test/Sema/attr-counted-by-for-flexible-array-members.c`.
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+
+#define __counted_by(f) __attribute__((counted_by(f)))
+
+struct size_unknown;
+
+struct at_pointer {
+ int count;
+ struct size_unknown *__counted_by(count) buf; //
expected-error{{'counted_by' cannot be
https://github.com/dtcxzyw closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85863
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Yingwei Zheng
Date: 2024-04-12T23:47:20+08:00
New Revision: e0a628715a8464e220c8ba9e9aaaf2561139198a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e0a628715a8464e220c8ba9e9aaaf2561139198a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e0a628715a8464e220c8ba9e9aaaf2561139198a.diff
https://github.com/mydeveloperday updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88490
>From 1c11c3edd0005a729561d84b9a815279b356e8db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mydeveloperday
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 10:32:19 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [clang-format] revery to string << string handling
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Nikolas Klauser (philnik777)
Changes
Currently `__is_trivially_equality_comparable` is documented to return true if
comparing the value representation is equivalent to calling the comparison
operator, which is not quite what the trait
https://github.com/philnik777 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88528
Currently `__is_trivially_equality_comparable` is documented to return true if
comparing the value representation is equivalent to calling the comparison
operator, which is not quite what the trait actually
@@ -19710,6 +19710,27 @@ bool Sema::IsLayoutCompatible(QualType T1, QualType
T2) const {
return isLayoutCompatible(getASTContext(), T1, T2);
}
+//===-- Pointer interconvertibility //
+
+bool
@@ -19710,6 +19710,27 @@ bool Sema::IsLayoutCompatible(QualType T1, QualType
T2) const {
return isLayoutCompatible(getASTContext(), T1, T2);
}
+//===-- Pointer interconvertibility //
+
+bool
@@ -6082,6 +6082,22 @@ static bool EvaluateBinaryTypeTrait(Sema ,
TypeTrait BTT, const TypeSourceI
Self.Diag(Rhs->getTypeLoc().getBeginLoc(), diag::err_vla_unsupported)
<< 1 << tok::kw___is_layout_compatible;
return Self.IsLayoutCompatible(LhsT, RhsT);
+
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88473
>From 84907542cecbe76b1971a50642d39ec4d1078687 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 08:18:06 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang] Implement
kovdan01 wrote:
@MaskRay A kind reminder regarding the PR - please let me know if latest
updates address your previous comments and if there are other issues still
present.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85235
___
cfe-commits mailing list
kito-cheng wrote:
Jeff told me it's still need wait TSC vote for the ratification, anyway it will
ratify this month.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76893
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
azhan92 wrote:
@MaskRay, thanks, so would it be better for me to change the XFAIL to
UNSUPPORTED in this case?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87269
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/dougsonos edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84983
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/dougsonos edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84983
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1740,7 +1740,7 @@ void is_layout_compatible(int n)
static_assert(!__is_layout_compatible(void, int));
static_assert(__is_layout_compatible(void, const void));
static_assert(__is_layout_compatible(void, volatile void));
- static_assert(__is_layout_compatible(const
yronglin wrote:
> LGTM again, thanks for the extra work to get JSON dumping as well!
Thanks for your review!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88269
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
Author: Dominik Adamski
Date: 2024-04-12T16:41:34+02:00
New Revision: a27ab3f54377a0addeef1ec9ba7c826fd885a304
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a27ab3f54377a0addeef1ec9ba7c826fd885a304
DIFF:
https://github.com/DominikAdamski closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88190
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
shenjunjiekoda wrote:
> Looks clean to me, even though I haven't checked how the ContainerModeling
> checker works.
Dear @steakhal , I hope this message finds you well. I find my pull request
(PR#87787) submitted a week ago, which has been approved but not yet merged
into the LLVM base
https://github.com/yronglin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88269
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
revane wrote:
@AaronBallman Other reviewers you would suggest?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88186
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
revane wrote:
@AaronBallman I can't land this PR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88268
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/arsenm approved this pull request.
We should really fix using cmpxchg here. Can you open an IR issue for it?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88215
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -345,7 +345,13 @@ void Flang::AddAMDGPUTargetArgs(const ArgList ,
// Check ROCm path if specified
const ToolChain = getToolChain();
- TC.getDeviceLibs(Args);
+ std::string HIPVersion;
+ llvm::raw_string_ostream HIPInfo(HIPVersion);
+ TC.printVerboseInfo(HIPInfo);
@@ -201,3 +201,16 @@
! RUN: -nogpulibc %s 2>&1 \
! RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=NO-LIBC-GPU-AMDGPU %s
! NO-LIBC-GPU-AMDGPU-NOT: "-lcgpu-amdgpu"
+
+! RUN: rm -rf %t/Inputs
+! RUN: mkdir -p %t/Inputs
+! RUN: cp -r %S/../../../clang/test/Driver/Inputs/rocm
https://github.com/jhuber6 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88190
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -851,6 +852,16 @@ int main(void) {
// CHECK: call{{.*}} @__kmpc_flush(
#pragma omp atomic seq_cst
rix = dv / rix;
+
+// CHECK: [[LD_CPX:%.+]] = load atomic ptr, ptr @cpx monotonic
+// CHECK: br label %[[CONT:.+]]
+// CHECK: [[CONT]]
+// CHECK: [[PHI:%.+]] = phi ptr
+//
https://github.com/DominikAdamski updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88190
>From 44def17f36e8e27eb4232681e5ae7eff5de6d90f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dominik Adamski
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 14:35:26 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [Flang][AMDGPU] Add rocm-path flag
ROCm
@@ -4429,6 +4433,210 @@ class FunctionNoProtoType : public FunctionType, public
llvm::FoldingSetNode {
}
};
+//
--
+
+class Decl;
+class CXXMethodDecl;
+class FunctionEffectSet;
+
+/// Represents
https://github.com/mydeveloperday updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88490
>From 1c11c3edd0005a729561d84b9a815279b356e8db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mydeveloperday
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 10:32:19 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang-format] revery to string << string handling
https://github.com/alexey-bataev approved this pull request.
LG
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88411
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mydeveloperday edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88490
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mydeveloperday updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88490
>From 1c11c3edd0005a729561d84b9a815279b356e8db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mydeveloperday
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 10:32:19 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang-format] revery to string << string handling
@@ -201,3 +201,16 @@
! RUN: -nogpulibc %s 2>&1 \
! RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=NO-LIBC-GPU-AMDGPU %s
! NO-LIBC-GPU-AMDGPU-NOT: "-lcgpu-amdgpu"
+
+! RUN: rm -rf %t/Inputs
+! RUN: mkdir -p %t/Inputs
+! RUN: cp -r %S/../../../clang/test/Driver/Inputs/rocm
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM again, thanks for the extra work to get JSON dumping as well!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88269
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/mydeveloperday updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88490
>From 1c11c3edd0005a729561d84b9a815279b356e8db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mydeveloperday
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 10:32:19 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-format] revery to string << string handling
arsenm wrote:
"CDNA version" isn't even a defined, technical concept, much less a useful one.
We should be not be expanding the set of device macros, and strongly
discouraging further use.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88293
___
https://github.com/arsenm closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88293
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -6867,8 +6867,14 @@ void Clang::ConstructJob(Compilation , const JobAction
,
CmdArgs.push_back("-nogpulib");
if (Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_fcf_protection_EQ)) {
-CmdArgs.push_back(
-Args.MakeArgString(Twine("-fcf-protection=") +
vgvassilev wrote:
> I can confirm that the double space comes from this PR;
>
> ```diff
> diff --git a/clang/unittests/AST/DeclPrinterTest.cpp
> b/clang/unittests/AST/DeclPrinterTest.cpp
> index c24e442621c9..c2d02e74a62c 100644
> --- a/clang/unittests/AST/DeclPrinterTest.cpp
> +++
https://github.com/erichkeane updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88411
>From 408f39f8ed0ee121aeaeb15c02603bb127e8cb73 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: erichkeane
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 07:56:30 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [OpenACC] Implement 'if' clause for Compute Constructs
Like
https://github.com/erichkeane updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88411
>From 408f39f8ed0ee121aeaeb15c02603bb127e8cb73 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: erichkeane
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 07:56:30 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [OpenACC] Implement 'if' clause for Compute Constructs
Like
https://github.com/DominikAdamski updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88190
>From 44def17f36e8e27eb4232681e5ae7eff5de6d90f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dominik Adamski
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 14:35:26 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Flang][AMDGPU] Add rocm-path flag
ROCm
erichkeane wrote:
> General question. Should there be some support in
> clang/tools/libclang/CIndex.cpp?
Sorry, I only just saw this! I guess I don't have a good idea what the CIndex
stuff does. I see there is quite a bit of this 'Enqueue' functionality in
CIndex.cpp, but it isn't clear
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+// Check that -fcf-protection does not get passed to the device-side
+// compilation.
+
+// RUN: %clang -### -x cuda --target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -nogpulib \
+// RUN: -nogpuinc --offload-arch=sm_52 -fcf-protection=full -c %s 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck %s
@@ -6867,8 +6867,14 @@ void Clang::ConstructJob(Compilation , const JobAction
,
CmdArgs.push_back("-nogpulib");
if (Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_fcf_protection_EQ)) {
-CmdArgs.push_back(
-Args.MakeArgString(Twine("-fcf-protection=") +
https://github.com/DominikAdamski updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88190
>From 44def17f36e8e27eb4232681e5ae7eff5de6d90f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dominik Adamski
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 14:35:26 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Flang][AMDGPU] Add rocm-path flag
ROCm
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+// Check that -fcf-protection does not get passed to the device-side
+// compilation.
+
+// RUN: %clang -### -x cuda --target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -nogpulib \
+// RUN: -nogpuinc --offload-arch=sm_52 -fcf-protection=full -c %s 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck %s
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+// Check that -fcf-protection does not get passed to the device-side
+// compilation.
+
+// RUN: %clang -### -x cuda --target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -nogpulib \
+// RUN: -nogpuinc --offload-arch=sm_52 -fcf-protection=full -c %s 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck %s
@@ -6867,8 +6867,14 @@ void Clang::ConstructJob(Compilation , const JobAction
,
CmdArgs.push_back("-nogpulib");
if (Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_fcf_protection_EQ)) {
-CmdArgs.push_back(
-Args.MakeArgString(Twine("-fcf-protection=") +
Michael137 wrote:
LGTM, but would like @rjmccall or @AaronBallman (or another code-owner) to give
final approval
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84384
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84384
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -251,15 +423,16 @@ class Qualifiers {
}
// Deserialize qualifiers from an opaque representation.
- static Qualifiers fromOpaqueValue(unsigned opaque) {
+ static Qualifiers fromOpaqueValue(uint64_t Opaque) {
Qualifiers Qs;
-Qs.Mask = opaque;
+Qs.Mask =
@@ -11099,6 +11099,19 @@ OpenACCClause
*TreeTransform::TransformOpenACCClause(
ParsedClause.setDefaultDetails(
cast(OldClause)->getDefaultClauseKind());
break;
+ case OpenACCClauseKind::If: {
+Expr *Cond = const_cast(
+
@@ -345,7 +345,13 @@ void Flang::AddAMDGPUTargetArgs(const ArgList ,
// Check ROCm path if specified
const ToolChain = getToolChain();
- TC.getDeviceLibs(Args);
+ std::string HIPVersion;
+ llvm::raw_string_ostream HIPInfo(HIPVersion);
+ TC.printVerboseInfo(HIPInfo);
mahtohappy wrote:
Hi Please Review this. @Endilll @cor3ntin @AaronBallman
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83124
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87909
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2024-04-12T16:02:57+04:00
New Revision: 5ebeaf211551f9410e17b1134126daadd8b163ac
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5ebeaf211551f9410e17b1134126daadd8b163ac
DIFF:
tstellar wrote:
> I'm assuming this is a stop-gap, and the plan is to eventually fix the issue
> and reenable PGO in the release cache?
Yes, I would like to fix this at some point, but not sure when I'll get to it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88465
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87909
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Aaron Ballman
Date: 2024-04-12T07:43:39-04:00
New Revision: 33779b861d748ed18b8d4f9cbad3a84deaa95e9f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/33779b861d748ed18b8d4f9cbad3a84deaa95e9f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/33779b861d748ed18b8d4f9cbad3a84deaa95e9f.diff
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-ir
Author: None (CarolineConcatto)
Changes
… single
According to the specification in
ARM-software/acle#309 this adds the intrinsics
// And similarly for u8.
svint8_t svreadz_hor_za8_s8(uint64_t tile, uint32_t slice) __arm_streaming
https://github.com/CarolineConcatto created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88499
… single
According to the specification in
ARM-software/acle#309 this adds the intrinsics
// And similarly for u8.
svint8_t svreadz_hor_za8_s8(uint64_t tile, uint32_t slice) __arm_streaming
@@ -3756,12 +3756,11 @@ def err_sme_definition_using_za_in_non_sme_target :
Error<
def err_sme_definition_using_zt0_in_non_sme2_target : Error<
"function using ZT0 state requires 'sme2'">;
def warn_sme_streaming_pass_return_vl_to_non_streaming : Warning<
- "passing a
https://github.com/sdesmalen-arm commented:
Left two nits, but otherwise looks good.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88380
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -3756,12 +3756,11 @@ def err_sme_definition_using_za_in_non_sme_target :
Error<
def err_sme_definition_using_zt0_in_non_sme2_target : Error<
"function using ZT0 state requires 'sme2'">;
def warn_sme_streaming_pass_return_vl_to_non_streaming : Warning<
- "passing a
https://github.com/sdesmalen-arm edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88380
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mydeveloperday updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88490
>From 1c11c3edd0005a729561d84b9a815279b356e8db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mydeveloperday
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 10:32:19 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-format] revery to string << string handling
https://github.com/philnik777 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87361
>From b8a626116b0719c1acf75e9e7300df8e2bf82f99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nikolas Klauser
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 18:00:05 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang] Reduce the size of Decl and classes derived from
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2024-04-12T13:06:59+03:00
New Revision: c39df496d73621238ba87de235d9a61e2b2203b9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c39df496d73621238ba87de235d9a61e2b2203b9
DIFF:
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86629
>From b8a69cbd9e0ee0aa35b38b7e3a78048cbe61447e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 23:30:10 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [clangd] Support go-to-definition on type hints. The
core
https://github.com/chrisnc updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88287
>From 58f4d1acb3a88ec0b7d623fd7607d355f6dfe2c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Copeland
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 22:40:46 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [ARM] Armv8-R does not require fp64 or neon.
---
https://github.com/VyacheslavLevytskyy approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88325
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
mydeveloperday wrote:
Other related issues
#44363 , #59797
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88490
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
mydeveloperday wrote:
Fixes #88483
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88490
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff ff9bc3a0fa4e3790c437e62450903bf399df37f9
1c11c3edd0005a729561d84b9a815279b356e8db --
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: MyDeveloperDay (mydeveloperday)
Changes
Fixes 88433
A change made to the handling of chevron operators causes a large amount of
flux in code bases that were previously using clang-format, this fix reverts
that change to the default
201 - 300 of 350 matches
Mail list logo
