https://github.com/aheejin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80923
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89707
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/shafik commented:
So this seems to apply to member pointer types, pointer types, arrays and
function types but I don't see coverage for the full set of paths in the tests.
Can we please add more testing.
Erich also expressed some concern about breaking existing code due to
@@ -113,7 +114,7 @@ struct SA {
#pragma omp target map(b[true:true])
{}
-#pragma omp target map(: c,f) // expected-error {{missing map type}}
+#pragma omp target map(: c,f) // lt60-error {{missing map type}}
alexey-bataev wrote:
Hm,, I see in
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ C++2c implementation status
Trivial infinite loops are not Undefined Behavior
https://wg21.link/P2809R3;>P2809R3 (DR)
- Clang 19
+ No
vogelsgesang wrote:
unreleased -> none
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90495
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ C++2c implementation status
Attributes for Structured Bindings
https://wg21.link/P0609R3;>P0609R3
- No
+ Clang 19
vogelsgesang wrote:
none -> unreleased
But maybe just fix this together when landing #90066...
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90370
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
MaskRay wrote:
This simplification seems desired. https://reviews.llvm.org/D00#3302749 had
a `LLVM_INSTALL_TOOLCHAIN_ONLY` condition, which seems unneeded.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90370
___
cfe-commits mailing list
Author: Fangrui Song
Date: 2024-04-29T13:47:09-07:00
New Revision: 6f390ea60d987f6e1e027d1c72982c2eb7896005
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6f390ea60d987f6e1e027d1c72982c2eb7896005
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6f390ea60d987f6e1e027d1c72982c2eb7896005.diff
Author: Seth Pellegrino
Date: 2024-04-29T13:45:00-07:00
New Revision: 347a02b408567ba15fdc68646129c1f5de97ab7e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/347a02b408567ba15fdc68646129c1f5de97ab7e
DIFF:
https://github.com/erichkeane commented:
Missing test + release note.
In the future, please use 'draft pull request' when your patch is not ready for
review/to be committed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90517
___
cfe-commits mailing
@@ -535,20 +535,24 @@ void AggExprEmitter::EmitArrayInit(Address DestPtr,
llvm::ArrayType *AType,
elementType.isTriviallyCopyableType(CGF.getContext())) {
CodeGen::CodeGenModule = CGF.CGM;
ConstantEmitter Emitter(CGF);
-LangAS AS =
@@ -1056,6 +1083,25 @@ void CoroCloner::create() {
// Set up the new entry block.
replaceEntryBlock();
+ // Turn symmetric transfers into musttail calls.
+ for (CallInst *ResumeCall : Shape.SymmetricTransfers) {
+ResumeCall = cast(VMap[ResumeCall]);
+
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Erich Keane (erichkeane)
Changes
The private clause is the first that takes a 'var-list', thus this has a lot of
additional work to enable the var-list type. A 'var' is a traditional variable
reference, subscript, member-expression, or
https://github.com/erichkeane created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90521
The private clause is the first that takes a 'var-list', thus this has a lot of
additional work to enable the var-list type. A 'var' is a traditional variable
reference, subscript, member-expression, or
https://github.com/hekota updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89809
>From 22b67d30ca087d6a912183039c87fd1790eedfe4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Helena Kotas
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:49:28 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Add environment parameter to clang availability attribute
---
@@ -3123,8 +3123,22 @@ Address X86_64ABIInfo::EmitVAArg(CodeGenFunction ,
Address VAListAddr,
RegAddr = Tmp.withElementType(LTy);
} else if (neededInt) {
-RegAddr = Address(CGF.Builder.CreateGEP(CGF.Int8Ty, RegSaveArea,
gp_offset),
- LTy,
https://github.com/andykaylor closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89477
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Andy Kaylor
Date: 2024-04-29T13:22:08-07:00
New Revision: 8ba880b587074ad6c8624ed45ea2b289f653667f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8ba880b587074ad6c8624ed45ea2b289f653667f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8ba880b587074ad6c8624ed45ea2b289f653667f.diff
@@ -908,6 +908,74 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitIfStmt(const IfStmt ) {
incrementProfileCounter();
}
+bool CodeGenFunction::checkIfLoopMustProgress(const Expr
*ControllingExpression,
+ bool IsTrivialCXXLoop) {
+ if
farzonl wrote:
> Are you intentionally skipping implementing changes to __builtin_tan()?
Yes but, maybe my reasoning isn't good enough to exclude. Let me know. I didn't
add it for two reasons.
First sine and cosine define builtins like so:
```
def SinF16F128 : Builtin, F16F128MathTemplate {
klausler wrote:
See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90518, which I think would
greatly ease implementation of `-w`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90420
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -113,7 +114,7 @@ struct SA {
#pragma omp target map(b[true:true])
{}
-#pragma omp target map(: c,f) // expected-error {{missing map type}}
+#pragma omp target map(: c,f) // lt60-error {{missing map type}}
jyu2-git wrote:
Yes.
https://github.com/jyu2-git updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90499
>From 20904df466de953880ca6af4afd72d7dfae33224 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jennifer Yu
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 10:01:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [OpenMP][TR12] change proerty of map-type modifer.
map-type
https://github.com/cor3ntin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90485
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Jorge Pinto Sousa
Date: 2024-04-29T22:14:53+02:00
New Revision: e5907c88594133e45b8d1d4e29702b96d7f45c77
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e5907c88594133e45b8d1d4e29702b96d7f45c77
DIFF:
cor3ntin wrote:
This compiles locally. CI is really slow...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90495
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cor3ntin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90495
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: cor3ntin
Date: 2024-04-29T22:11:09+02:00
New Revision: 326657f5679889e3374354ba3243e27bda2080f4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/326657f5679889e3374354ba3243e27bda2080f4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/326657f5679889e3374354ba3243e27bda2080f4.diff
sdkrystian wrote:
This actually requires a little more work... (the delayed exception
specification parsing code seems to only expect `CXXMethodDecl`s). I'll take
care of that tomorrow.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90517
___
https://github.com/aganea edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89950
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -792,10 +792,15 @@ int clang_scan_deps_main(int argc, char **argv, const
llvm::ToolContext &) {
llvm::cl::PrintOptionValues();
+ // Expand response files in advance, so that we can "see" all the arguments
+ // when adjusting below.
+ auto ResponseExpander =
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+// Check that the scanner can adjust arguments by reading .rsp files in
advance.
+
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: split-file %s %t
+// RUN: sed -e "s|DIR|%/t|g" %t/cdb.json.template > %t/cdb.json
+// RUN: echo /Fo%t/tu.obj >> %t/args_nested.rsp
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+// Check that the scanner can adjust arguments by reading .rsp files in
advance.
+
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: split-file %s %t
+// RUN: sed -e "s|DIR|%/t|g" %t/cdb.json.template > %t/cdb.json
aganea wrote:
As suggested. We're taking a
@@ -1069,7 +1069,7 @@ void Clang::AddPreprocessingOptions(Compilation , const
JobAction ,
// If user provided -o, that is the dependency target, except
// when we are only generating a dependency file.
- Arg *OutputOpt = Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_o);
+
https://github.com/aganea updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89950
>From f2340c98c95e0d72516fc240ff268fead9f15391 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexandre Ganea
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 16:28:21 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang-scan-deps] Expand response files before the
sdkrystian wrote:
Note: This still needs a release note + test updates
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90517
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Krystian Stasiowski (sdkrystian)
Changes
According to [[class.mem.general]
p8](http://eel.is/c++draft/class.mem.general#8):
A complete-class context of a class (template) is a
- function body,
- default argument,
- default template
https://github.com/sdkrystian created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90517
According to [[class.mem.general]
p8](http://eel.is/c++draft/class.mem.general#8):
> A complete-class context of a class (template) is a
> - function body,
> - default argument,
> - default template argument,
https://github.com/lanza closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89030
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Nathan Lanza
Date: 2024-04-29T15:46:18-04:00
New Revision: 359ab3aebba302fb4c37373b9907bc8880be7363
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/359ab3aebba302fb4c37373b9907bc8880be7363
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/359ab3aebba302fb4c37373b9907bc8880be7363.diff
https://github.com/lanza edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89030
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -674,6 +674,9 @@
# DEBUG-NEXT: .. opcode {{[0-9]+}} is aliased to {{[0-9]+}}
# DEBUG-NEXT: .. the first uncovered type index: 1, OK
# DEBUG-NEXT: .. the first uncovered imm index: 0, OK
+# DEBUG-NEXT: G_FTAN (opcode {{[0-9]+}}): 1 type index, 0 imm indices
https://github.com/cor3ntin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89923
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Troy Butler
Date: 2024-04-29T21:24:29+02:00
New Revision: 99ce84cef0185fe9eaec51e40ea80f69f06981f0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/99ce84cef0185fe9eaec51e40ea80f69f06981f0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/99ce84cef0185fe9eaec51e40ea80f69f06981f0.diff
cor3ntin wrote:
I think CI is having some difficulties. No need to wait for it for this.
Thanks a lot for your first contribution!
We have some good first issues if you want to have a go at some more
contributions
shafik wrote:
The `amdgpu-toolchain.c` test failure looks unrelated. I think we need another
empty commit to kick off the build again unfortunately.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89923
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/shafik approved this pull request.
LGTM, thank you for the documentation fix.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90485
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
tschuett wrote:
Firstly, it is a nit. The IRTranslator translates LLVM-IR into GMIR for
GlobalIsel. Testing the IRTranslator is independent of any SDAG changes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90503
___
cfe-commits mailing list
@@ -1105,6 +1105,11 @@ bool MicrosoftCXXABI::hasMostDerivedReturn(GlobalDecl
GD) const {
static bool isTrivialForMSVC(const CXXRecordDecl *RD, QualType Ty,
CodeGenModule ) {
+ // If the record is marked with the trivial_abi attribute, we don't
+
dwblaikie wrote:
> > C doesn't have an odr, does it?
>
> For non-C++ "ODR" has a meaning more like "ODR-inspired checks". But there is
> no language rule that would require enforcement and there is no impact on
> linkage (at least during deserialization).
Not sure I'm following the response
farzonl wrote:
> Nit: the `declare` is not necessary anymore. You touched the IRTranslator
> without a test at, e.g.,
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/GlobalISel/arm64-irtranslator.ll
The aarch64 backend tag is a misnomer because adding `G_FTAN`
https://github.com/hokein edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90466
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/efriedma-quic closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90151
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Eli Friedman
Date: 2024-04-29T12:00:12-07:00
New Revision: 3ab4ae9e58c09dfd8203547ba8916f3458a0a481
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3ab4ae9e58c09dfd8203547ba8916f3458a0a481
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3ab4ae9e58c09dfd8203547ba8916f3458a0a481.diff
efriedma-quic wrote:
Are you intentionally skipping implementing changes to __builtin_tan()?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90276
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/sousajo-cc edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90485
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
lntue wrote:
> #85868
You can update the title of the PR to reflect the changes, and add `Fixes
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/85868` to relating the PR to the
issue.
OTOH, the libc changes look good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90391
@@ -908,6 +908,74 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitIfStmt(const IfStmt ) {
incrementProfileCounter();
}
+bool CodeGenFunction::checkIfLoopMustProgress(const Expr
*ControllingExpression,
+ bool IsTrivialCXXLoop) {
+ if
@@ -1465,6 +1465,7 @@ void CodeGenFunction::GenerateCode(GlobalDecl GD,
llvm::Function *Fn,
// Ensure that the function adheres to the forward progress guarantee, which
// is required by certain optimizations.
+ // The attribute will be removed if the body contains a
@@ -1056,6 +1083,25 @@ void CoroCloner::create() {
// Set up the new entry block.
replaceEntryBlock();
+ // Turn symmetric transfers into musttail calls.
+ for (CallInst *ResumeCall : Shape.SymmetricTransfers) {
+ResumeCall = cast(VMap[ResumeCall]);
+
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 4
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -O3 -emit-llvm -o - %s \
+// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK %s
+
+// Reproducer for issue #87758
+// The
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 4
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -O3 -emit-llvm -o - %s \
+// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK %s
+
zahiraam wrote:
How about
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 4
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -O3 -emit-llvm -o - %s \
zahiraam wrote:
There is no need to use -O3 here to prove what you want,
https://github.com/andykaylor edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89477
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/andykaylor updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89477
>From 8ab931c4506f08685758a58f4cf7974c5254c3fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andy Kaylor
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 17:53:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] Clean up denormal handling with -ffp-model, -ffast-math,
@@ -28,12 +28,8 @@ PreservedAnalyses LinkInModulesPass::run(Module ,
ModuleAnalysisManager ) {
if (!BC)
return PreservedAnalyses::all();
- // Re-load bitcode modules from files
- if (BC->ReloadModules())
-report_fatal_error("Bitcode module re-loading failed,
https://github.com/alexey-bataev edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90499
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -113,7 +114,7 @@ struct SA {
#pragma omp target map(b[true:true])
{}
-#pragma omp target map(: c,f) // expected-error {{missing map type}}
+#pragma omp target map(: c,f) // lt60-error {{missing map type}}
alexey-bataev wrote:
So, does
tschuett wrote:
Nit: the `declare` is not necessary anymore. You touched the IRTranslator
without a test at, e.g.,
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/GlobalISel/arm64-irtranslator.ll
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90503
@@ -113,7 +114,7 @@ struct SA {
#pragma omp target map(b[true:true])
{}
-#pragma omp target map(: c,f) // expected-error {{missing map type}}
+#pragma omp target map(: c,f) // lt60-error {{missing map type}}
jyu2-git wrote:
In OMP60, the
https://github.com/ldionne approved this pull request.
The libc++abi changes look fine to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90391
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
This looks fine enough to me. Aaron is away this week, so you can either let
him review this when he gets back, or just merge this and let him make comments
on followups/on the commit when he gets back.
delcypher wrote:
@AaronBallman @erichkeane Ping. Is this ready to land?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88596
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hekota approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90277
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hekota approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90276
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
This needs a release note, likely in the 'potentially breaking changes'.
Projects are filled with code that is not ever instantiated, and Clang's
aggressive instantiation can be a problem.
Else, LGTM.
dwblaikie wrote:
Comment in the code should probably mention this as a FIXME and include a
reference to the issue?
Also, there's another bug here - the DW_TAG_typedef is in the CU scope, instead
of the struct scope. But if the struct is a non-template, the typedef is in the
struct scope as
@@ -7334,6 +7334,92 @@ static void handleHLSLShaderAttr(Sema , Decl *D, const
ParsedAttr ) {
D->addAttr(NewAttr);
}
+static void DiagnoseHLSLResourceRegType(Sema , SourceLocation ,
+Decl *D, StringRef ) {
+ // Samplers, UAVs, and
@@ -7334,6 +7334,92 @@ static void handleHLSLShaderAttr(Sema , Decl *D, const
ParsedAttr ) {
D->addAttr(NewAttr);
}
+static void DiagnoseHLSLResourceRegType(Sema , SourceLocation ,
+Decl *D, StringRef ) {
+ // Samplers, UAVs, and
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-globalisel
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-analysis
Author: Farzon Lotfi (farzonl)
Changes
This change is an implementation of #87367's investigation on
supporting IEEE math operations as intrinsics.
Which was discussed in this RFC:
https://github.com/farzonl ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90503
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/llvm-beanz updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90222
>From a173605b6043739e69f89d3a559a4f6a68d5fc0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Bieneman
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 15:47:22 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [HLSL] Shore up floating point conversions
This PR fixes
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-spir-v
Author: Farzon Lotfi (farzonl)
Changes
This change is an implementation of #87367's investigation on
supporting IEEE math operations as intrinsics.
Which was discussed in this RFC:
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-ir
Author: Farzon Lotfi (farzonl)
Changes
This change is an implementation of #87367's investigation on
supporting IEEE math operations as intrinsics.
Which was discussed in this RFC:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-all-the-math-intrinsics/78294
https://github.com/farzonl ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90278
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v
Author: Farzon Lotfi (farzonl)
Changes
This change is an implementation of #87367's investigation on
supporting IEEE math operations as intrinsics.
Which was discussed in this RFC:
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-ir
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86
Author: Farzon Lotfi (farzonl)
Changes
This change is an implementation of #87367's investigation on
supporting IEEE math operations as intrinsics.
Which was discussed in this RFC:
https://github.com/farzonl ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90277
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/farzonl ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90276
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ void foo2() {
// expected-warning@+1 {{'register' attribute only applies to
cbuffer/tbuffer and external global variables}}
extern RWBuffer U2 : register(u5);
}
-// FIXME: expect-error once fix
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57886.
+//
https://github.com/farzonl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90277
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/farzonl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90088
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cor3ntin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90495
>From bc23126800d3977665f0e1393b65acfff742c028 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Corentin Jabot
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 18:34:49 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] Address post commit feedback in #89906
* Fix a leak
*
bulbazord wrote:
> > Please update the PR subject as its a lot more than just X86AsmParser.cpp
>
> Hi @RKSimon
>
> All the issues mentioned are fixed. The title of the PR is misleading. The
> title is the same as the issue (#85868) it corresponds to. Got a look to
> other PR's and I thought
https://github.com/farzonl created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90503
This change is an implementation of #87367's investigation on supporting IEEE
math operations as intrinsics.
Which was discussed in this RFC:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-all-the-math-intrinsics/78294
If
@@ -113,7 +114,7 @@ struct SA {
#pragma omp target map(b[true:true])
{}
-#pragma omp target map(: c,f) // expected-error {{missing map type}}
+#pragma omp target map(: c,f) // lt60-error {{missing map type}}
alexey-bataev wrote:
I assume this
@@ -4268,7 +4287,11 @@ bool
Parser::parseMapTypeModifiers(SemaOpenMP::OpenMPVarListDataTy ) {
}
// Potential map-type token as it is followed by a colon.
if (PP.LookAhead(0).is(tok::colon))
-return false;
+if (getLangOpts().OpenMP >= 60)
+
https://github.com/sdkrystian updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90500
>From 6a2d3719508fbd765a97e81688ae06996e7daf21 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krystian Stasiowski
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 08:17:21 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang][Sema] Earlier type checking for builtin unary
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -DWIN -verify -std=c++23 -fsyntax-only %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -std=c++23 -fsyntax-only %s
+
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+
+
+#ifdef WIN
+#define INFINITY ((float)(1e+300 * 1e+300))
+#define NAN (-(float)(INFINITY * 0.0F))
+#else
101 - 200 of 481 matches
Mail list logo
