HighCommander4 wrote:
> It crashes most likely because a local variable is captured in the static
> lambda.
>
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/bf895c714e1f8a51c1e565a75acf60bf7197be51/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/boost/UseRangesCheck.cpp#L208
Nice find! That does seem to be the prob
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clangd
Author: Nathan Ridge (HighCommander4)
Changes
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/109367
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111282.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/boost/UseRa
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Nathan Ridge (HighCommander4)
Changes
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/109367
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111282.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/boost/U
https://github.com/HighCommander4 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111282
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/109367
>From d7ec29dc8852c4ae8b239daff11acc42caf4d544 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Ridge
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2024 01:45:35 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Younan Zhang (zyn0217)
Changes
The special-casing for RequiresExprBodyDecl caused a regression, as reported in
#110785.
This also merged the test for #84020 together with that of #110785 into clang/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-requires-e
https://github.com/zyn0217 ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111277
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -4206,18 +4206,14 @@ Sema::InstantiateClassMembers(SourceLocation
PointOfInstantiation,
if (Function->hasAttr())
continue;
-MemberSpecializationInfo *MSInfo =
-Function->getMemberSpecializationInfo();
-assert(MSInfo && "No memb
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111277
>From 995603864598bcb826db8477406ee5f17bbe0548 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2024 12:46:21 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] Remove the special-casing for RequiresExprBodyDecl in
Bui
https://github.com/zyn0217 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111277
The special-casing for RequiresExprBodyDecl caused a regression, as reported in
#110785.
This also merged the test for #84020 together with that of #110785 into
clang/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-requires-exp
https://github.com/farzonl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109331
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -3096,6 +3096,15 @@ Instruction
*InstCombinerImpl::visitGetElementPtrInst(GetElementPtrInst &GEP) {
}
}
+ // nusw + nneg -> nuw
+ if (GEP.hasNoUnsignedSignedWrap() && !GEP.hasNoUnsignedWrap() &&
+ all_of(GEP.indices(), [&](Value *Idx) {
+return isKnown
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111273.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Program.cpp (+5-7)
``diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Pr
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111272.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/CheckerManager.cpp (+11-15)
``diff
diff --git a/clang/lib
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111273
None
>From 48c833ccac40522a563f6c1610eef409628a45d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kazu Hirata
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 10:22:58 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [ByteCode] Avoid repeated hash lookups (NFC)
---
cla
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111272
None
>From 9a5ad987040ed16478cd119814dc99ebc3d9d177 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kazu Hirata
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 10:24:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [StaticAnalyzer] Avoid repeated hash lookups (NFC)
--
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110387
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110387
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1994,8 +1995,10 @@
TemplateDeclInstantiator::VisitFunctionTemplateDecl(FunctionTemplateDecl *D) {
// Link the instantiation back to the pattern *unless* this is a
// non-definition friend declaration.
if (!InstTemplate->getInstantiatedFromMemberTemplate() &&
- !
https://github.com/mizvekov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110387
>From e6d3e6f1df5db1618c7302adac4b45b7aa451a34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matheus Izvekov
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 14:28:58 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Track function template instantiation from definition
@@ -4206,18 +4206,14 @@ Sema::InstantiateClassMembers(SourceLocation
PointOfInstantiation,
if (Function->hasAttr())
continue;
-MemberSpecializationInfo *MSInfo =
-Function->getMemberSpecializationInfo();
-assert(MSInfo && "No memb
@@ -156,7 +156,13 @@ namespace UsesThis {
auto h() -> decltype(this); // expected-error {{'this' cannot be used
in a static member function declaration}}
};
- template struct A; // expected-note 3{{in instantiation of}}
+ template struct A; // expected-note {{in insta
@@ -1994,8 +1995,10 @@
TemplateDeclInstantiator::VisitFunctionTemplateDecl(FunctionTemplateDecl *D) {
// Link the instantiation back to the pattern *unless* this is a
// non-definition friend declaration.
if (!InstTemplate->getInstantiatedFromMemberTemplate() &&
- !
@@ -5185,9 +5189,24 @@ void Sema::InstantiateFunctionDefinition(SourceLocation
PointOfInstantiation,
RebuildTypeSourceInfoForDefaultSpecialMembers();
SetDeclDefaulted(Function, PatternDecl->getLocation());
} else {
+NamedDecl *ND = Function;
+std::optional> I
bradh352 wrote:
ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108241
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111267
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 approved this pull request.
Makes sense to me, but I'd like to @erichkeane to have a look as well.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111267
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.or
@@ -4206,18 +4206,14 @@ Sema::InstantiateClassMembers(SourceLocation
PointOfInstantiation,
if (Function->hasAttr())
continue;
-MemberSpecializationInfo *MSInfo =
-Function->getMemberSpecializationInfo();
-assert(MSInfo && "No memb
@@ -156,7 +156,13 @@ namespace UsesThis {
auto h() -> decltype(this); // expected-error {{'this' cannot be used
in a static member function declaration}}
};
- template struct A; // expected-note 3{{in instantiation of}}
+ template struct A; // expected-note {{in insta
@@ -5185,9 +5189,24 @@ void Sema::InstantiateFunctionDefinition(SourceLocation
PointOfInstantiation,
RebuildTypeSourceInfoForDefaultSpecialMembers();
SetDeclDefaulted(Function, PatternDecl->getLocation());
} else {
+NamedDecl *ND = Function;
+std::optional> I
@@ -492,8 +489,10 @@ MultiLevelTemplateArgumentList
Sema::getTemplateInstantiationArgs(
// has a depth of 0.
if (const auto *TTP = dyn_cast(CurDecl))
HandleDefaultTempArgIntoTempTempParam(TTP, Result);
-CurDecl = Response::UseNextDecl(CurDecl).NextDecl;
- }
@@ -1994,8 +1995,10 @@
TemplateDeclInstantiator::VisitFunctionTemplateDecl(FunctionTemplateDecl *D) {
// Link the instantiation back to the pattern *unless* this is a
// non-definition friend declaration.
if (!InstTemplate->getInstantiatedFromMemberTemplate() &&
- !
https://github.com/zyn0217 commented:
Thanks for taking another look at it.
My main concern is that changes in `getTemplateInstantiationArgs()` would
conflict with @sdkrystian's recent work, so if these changes are necessary, I
suggest we merge this one after the refactoring patch lands, WDYT?
@@ -1829,7 +1831,7 @@ class DeclContext {
/// exactly 64 bits and thus the width of NumCtorInitializers
/// will need to be shrunk if some bit is added to NumDeclContextBitfields,
/// NumFunctionDeclBitfields or CXXConstructorDeclBitfields.
-uint64_t NumCtorInit
@@ -492,8 +489,10 @@ MultiLevelTemplateArgumentList
Sema::getTemplateInstantiationArgs(
// has a depth of 0.
if (const auto *TTP = dyn_cast(CurDecl))
HandleDefaultTempArgIntoTempTempParam(TTP, Result);
-CurDecl = Response::UseNextDecl(CurDecl).NextDecl;
- }
@@ -492,8 +489,10 @@ MultiLevelTemplateArgumentList
Sema::getTemplateInstantiationArgs(
// has a depth of 0.
if (const auto *TTP = dyn_cast(CurDecl))
HandleDefaultTempArgIntoTempTempParam(TTP, Result);
-CurDecl = Response::UseNextDecl(CurDecl).NextDecl;
- }
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110387
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -5185,9 +5189,24 @@ void Sema::InstantiateFunctionDefinition(SourceLocation
PointOfInstantiation,
RebuildTypeSourceInfoForDefaultSpecialMembers();
SetDeclDefaulted(Function, PatternDecl->getLocation());
} else {
+NamedDecl *ND = Function;
+std::optional> I
douzzer wrote:
The first draft solution worked perfectly for me, tested via cherry pick. Will
keep an eye on this PR in case the key name changes.
Thanks @whisperity!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe
https://github.com/keith-packard updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111235
>From 048cb1b0ea65fb758e104376c0bff345eab67623 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Keith Packard
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 21:06:37 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [libunwind] Support aarch64 without FPU
ldp and stp in
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Matheus Izvekov (mizvekov)
Changes
With this change, we discriminate if the primary template and which partial
specializations would have participated in overload resolution prior to P0522
changes.
We collect those in an initial set. If
https://github.com/mizvekov ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107350
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mizvekov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107350
>From 9b12c0b5a0b701984a83308273385c53ced29e41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matheus Izvekov
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 00:25:40 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] CWG2398: improve overload resolution backwards compat
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ class SizeofExpressionCheck : public ClangTidyCheck {
const bool WarnOnSizeOfCompareToConstant;
const bool WarnOnSizeOfPointerToAggregate;
const bool WarnOnSizeOfPointer;
+ const bool WarnOnSizeOfPointerArithmeticWithDivisionScaled;
nic
https://github.com/nicovank edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -306,8 +310,13 @@ void SizeofExpressionCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder
*Finder) {
unaryExprOrTypeTraitExpr(ofKind(UETT_AlignOf)),
offsetOfExpr()))
.bind("sizeof-in-ptr-arithmetic-scale-expr");
+ const auto PtrArithmeticIntege
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s bugprone-sizeof-expression %t -- \
+// RUN: -config="{CheckOptions: [{key:
bugprone-sizeof-expression.WarnOnSizeOfPointerArithmeticWithDivisionScaled,
value: 0}]}"
nicovank wrote:
```suggestion
// RUN: %check_cla
https://github.com/nicovank approved this pull request.
LGTM, nits. Maybe give a bit of time for others to take a look.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107786
>From e9948a1004cc2b486a0422d83e88392754e9f7e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 17:17:30 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] prevent recovery call expression from proceeding
w
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-libc-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-1` while building
`clang` at step 10 "Add check check-offload".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/73/builds/6650
Here is the r
https://github.com/cjappl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111249
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: davidtrevelyan
Date: 2024-10-05T13:46:32-07:00
New Revision: 47e6d1816251e90b3d589710c5203a92c6015a7c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/47e6d1816251e90b3d589710c5203a92c6015a7c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/47e6d1816251e90b3d589710c5203a92c6015a7c.diff
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Matheus Izvekov (mizvekov)
Changes
…on templates
When instantiating a class template, we would lose track of function template
explicit specializations, marking them with the wrong specialization kind.
This would lead to improperly using
https://github.com/mizvekov created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111267
…on templates
When instantiating a class template, we would lose track of function template
explicit specializations, marking them with the wrong specialization kind.
This would lead to improperly using the e
https://github.com/davidtrevelyan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111249
>From cb9d14bf2341f8570f29124ec26460811aa9eba9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Trevelyan
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 12:34:23 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [NFC][rtsan] Update docs to include [[clang::blockin
@@ -58,31 +58,71 @@ code.
return 0;
}
# Compile and link
- % clang++ -fsanitize=realtime -g example_realtime_violation.cpp
+ % clang++ -fsanitize=realtime example_realtime_violation.cpp
If a real-time safety violation is detected in a ``[[clang::nonblocking]]`
https://github.com/cjappl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111249
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -58,31 +58,71 @@ code.
return 0;
}
# Compile and link
- % clang++ -fsanitize=realtime -g example_realtime_violation.cpp
+ % clang++ -fsanitize=realtime example_realtime_violation.cpp
If a real-time safety violation is detected in a ``[[clang::nonblocking]]`
https://github.com/cjappl approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111249
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110761
>From 9c69d6584d6b71554aec55f0de52abb4baa9435f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 02:13:51 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [Clang] omit parentheses in fold expressions with a
single
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110761
>From 9c69d6584d6b71554aec55f0de52abb4baa9435f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 02:13:51 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [Clang] omit parentheses in fold expressions with a
single
@@ -1874,6 +1874,26 @@ bool SemaHLSL::CheckBuiltinFunctionCall(unsigned
BuiltinID, CallExpr *TheCall) {
return true;
break;
}
+ case Builtin::BI__builtin_hlsl_elementwise_firstbithigh: {
+if (SemaRef.PrepareBuiltinElementwiseMathOneArgCall(TheCall))
+ ret
mizvekov wrote:
I pushed a new implementation for this fix.
I have updated the implementation of InstantiateFunctionDefinition so that it
doesn't depend anymore on having the exact function declaration instantiation
which has the same template context as the definition.
This avoids the more e
echesakov wrote:
> Can you reword the description to have less wrapping
@arsenm @zahiraam Updated the commit/PR and added more details on the issue.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105912
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.o
https://github.com/echesakov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105912
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/echesakov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105912
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-arm-ubuntu` running
on `linaro-lldb-arm-ubuntu` while building `clang` at step 6 "test".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/18/builds/4980
Here is the relevant piece of the build log
https://github.com/echesakov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105912
>From 1231a5658bf7dde633e2d84967c6e540b3259e4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Egor Chesakov <5292656+echesa...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 12:22:27 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Allow `Cond
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111228
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2024-10-05T12:11:01-07:00
New Revision: 73683cc1ab0fe79a4b02b956cf3c033250537bff
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/73683cc1ab0fe79a4b02b956cf3c033250537bff
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/73683cc1ab0fe79a4b02b956cf3c033250537bff.diff
L
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan` running on `sanitizer-buildbot12`
while building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/55/builds/2533
Here is the rel
https://github.com/mikecrowe updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97911
>From 2dd0902d5f79a2b18f53649169bd011ccfbfb46b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Crowe
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 21:06:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] Only expand macros in
modernize-use-std-format/prin
https://github.com/mizvekov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110387
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mizvekov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110387
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++26 %s
mizvekov wrote:
Yeah I think this is big enough to be on its own file.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110387
___
cfe-commits mailing l
https://github.com/mizvekov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110387
>From 0ac3d1a93bbfcf50ed932ff149a48755819d4da0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matheus Izvekov
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 14:28:58 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Track function template instantiation from definition
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage` running on `linaro-g3-01` while building `clang`
at step 12 "ninja check 2".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/41/builds/2557
Here is the relevant piece of
nicovank wrote:
Thanks!
Is there still an issue with type stuff? If so, what would be a test case that
fails that shouldn't?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110351
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.or
@@ -29,6 +29,43 @@ struct multimap {
bool contains(const Key &K) const;
};
+using size_t = decltype(sizeof(int));
+
+// Lightweight standin for std::string_view.
+template
+class basic_string_view {
+public:
+ basic_string_view();
+ basic_string_view(const basic_string_vi
@@ -32,7 +33,8 @@ void ContainerContainsCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder
*Finder) {
const auto FindCall =
cxxMemberCallExpr(
- argumentCountIs(1),
+ anyOf(argumentCountIs(1),
+allOf(argumentCountIs(2), hasArgument(1,
cxxDefaultArg
@@ -453,3 +458,29 @@ void testOperandPermutations(std::map& Map) {
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:{{[0-9]+}}: warning: use 'contains' to check
for membership [readability-container-contains]
// CHECK-FIXES: if (!Map.contains(0)) {};
}
+
+void testStringNops(std::string St
@@ -50,12 +50,16 @@ struct basic_string {
size_type find(const _Type& str, size_type pos = 0) const;
size_type find(const C* s, size_type pos = 0) const;
size_type find(const C* s, size_type pos, size_type n) const;
+ size_type find(C ch, size_type pos = 0) const;
s
bigb4ng wrote:
@vitalybuka Unfortunately I cannot re-request since previous review is still
pending. Anyway I've included trap mode too.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100937
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://l
@@ -30,9 +32,15 @@ void ContainerContainsCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder
*Finder) {
ofClass(cxxRecordDecl(HasContainsMatchingParamType)
.bind("call");
+ const auto Literal0 = integerLiteral(equals(0));
+ const auto Literal1 = integerLiteral(e
@@ -50,12 +50,16 @@ struct basic_string {
size_type find(const _Type& str, size_type pos = 0) const;
size_type find(const C* s, size_type pos = 0) const;
size_type find(const C* s, size_type pos, size_type n) const;
+ size_type find(C ch, size_type pos = 0) const;
--
@@ -104,6 +108,9 @@ struct basic_string_view {
size_type rfind(const C* s, size_type pos, size_type count) const;
size_type rfind(const C* s, size_type pos = npos) const;
+ bool contains(const C *s) const;
+ bool contains(C s) const;
nicovank wrote:
```
https://github.com/bigb4ng updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100937
>From 6e2b5abc123261439489ee38a55111d9b6e7e6f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: bigb4ng
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2024 18:26:38 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [sanitizer] Document sanitizers security considerations
Follow-up to
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-arm-ubuntu` running
on `linaro-lldb-arm-ubuntu` while building `clang` at step 6 "test".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/18/builds/4975
Here is the relevant piece of the build log
echesakov wrote:
> Not very clear to me what the issue is. Can you please explain this in the
> description. I think here the `#pragma float_control(precise, on)` should be
> taking precedence over the `-ffast-math` flag and it's not. Right?
@zahiraam Correct, this is not happening right now a
https://github.com/echesakov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105912
>From 124a1c4c7c102421b74eaaa1133ea58a9017e07b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Egor Chesakov <5292656+echesa...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 18:44:14 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Allow
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -disable-llvm-passes -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -disable-llvm-passes -emit-llvm -menable-no-infs
-fapprox-func\
+// RUN: -funsafe-math-optimizations -fno-signed-zeros -mreassociate
-freciprocal-math\
+// RUN: -ffp-c
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-arm64-windows-msvc`
running on `linaro-armv8-windows-msvc-04` while building `clang` at step 5
"ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/161/builds/2552
Here is the relev
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -disable-llvm-passes -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -disable-llvm-passes -emit-llvm -menable-no-infs
-fapprox-func\
+// RUN: -funsafe-math-optimizations -fno-signed-zeros -mreassociate
-freciprocal-math\
+// RUN: -ffp-c
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111228
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
kazutakahirata wrote:
Please take a look. Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111228
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -92,11 +92,10 @@ parseTargetIDWithFormatCheckingOnly(llvm::StringRef
TargetID,
if (Sign != '+' && Sign != '-')
return std::nullopt;
bool IsOn = Sign == '+';
-auto Loc = FeatureMap->find(Feature);
+auto [Loc, Inserted] = FeatureMap->try_emplace(Feature,
https://github.com/kazutakahirata updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111228
>From 2e3d116613a7441b31036cf603d581db6e0afe9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kazu Hirata
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 08:00:11 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Basic] Avoid repeated hash lookups (NFC)
---
clang/li
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111227
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2024-10-05T09:51:12-07:00
New Revision: e8f01b0557354a28d17bfe618df5e257ec3e982a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e8f01b0557354a28d17bfe618df5e257ec3e982a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e8f01b0557354a28d17bfe618df5e257ec3e982a.diff
L
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111225
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2024-10-05T09:49:49-07:00
New Revision: 8aa76d34ea95031abed32761251951c5f87492c6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8aa76d34ea95031abed32761251951c5f87492c6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8aa76d34ea95031abed32761251951c5f87492c6.diff
L
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
