urusant added inline comments.
Comment at: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ReturnNonBoolChecker.cpp:50
@@ +49,3 @@
+ if (!State->contains(SR)) return;
+
+ ExplodedNode *N = C.generateErrorNode(C.getState());
I have just noticed that I didn't specify the style
urusant updated this revision to Diff 71927.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24507
Files:
include/clang/Basic/Attr.td
include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td
include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/Checkers.td
lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp
urusant updated this revision to Diff 71921.
urusant added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D24507#546380, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> We try to keep our tests segregated by functionality. e.g., tests relating to
> the way the attribute is handled (what it appertains to, args, etc) should
>
urusant added a comment.
Thank you for the feedback.
> The patch is missing Sema tests for the attribute (that it only applies to
> declarations you expect, accepts no args, etc).
There is one test case for that in test/ReturnNonBoolTestCompileTime.cpp. I've
added another one for attribute
urusant updated this revision to Diff 71807.
urusant added a comment.
Made some changes based on the comments. Please refer to the replies below.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24507
Files:
include/clang/Basic/Attr.td
include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td
urusant created this revision.
urusant added reviewers: zaks.anna, dcoughlin, jordan_rose, NoQ.
urusant added subscribers: cfe-commits, daviddrysdale.
urusant set the repository for this revision to rL LLVM.
Herald added subscribers: mgorny, beanz.
Hi,
I am interested in feedback on a patch I
