@@ -864,11 +864,18 @@ INTERCEPTOR(void *, pvalloc, size_t size) {
#define RTSAN_MAYBE_INTERCEPT_PVALLOC
#endif
+#if !SANITIZER_FREEBSD
+// enabling this interception on freebsd leads to infinite recursion
+// on pthread lib initialization
cjappl wrote:
It loo
@@ -1539,6 +1543,7 @@ TEST_F(KqueueTest, KeventDiesWhenRealtime) {
ExpectNonRealtimeSurvival(Func);
}
+#if SANITIZER_APPLE
cjappl wrote:
ah, fine to leave then probably. Thanks for pointing that out
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125389
@@ -864,11 +864,18 @@ INTERCEPTOR(void *, pvalloc, size_t size) {
#define RTSAN_MAYBE_INTERCEPT_PVALLOC
#endif
+#if !SANITIZER_FREEBSD
+// enabling this interception on freebsd leads to infinite recursion
+// on pthread lib initialization
cjappl wrote:
Can yo
https://github.com/cjappl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125389
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1539,6 +1543,7 @@ TEST_F(KqueueTest, KeventDiesWhenRealtime) {
ExpectNonRealtimeSurvival(Func);
}
+#if SANITIZER_APPLE
cjappl wrote:
"Kqueue is a scalable event notification interface introduced in FreeBSD 4.1 in
July 2000, also supported in NetBSD, Op
https://github.com/cjappl commented:
Cool, much better with this version of the init! A few more smaller scale
things and this is looking good
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125389
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
htt
@@ -43,6 +44,21 @@ static __rtsan::Context &GetContextForThisThreadImpl() {
return *current_thread_context;
}
+#else
+
+// On FreeBSD, pthread api cannot be used as calloc is called under the hood
+// at library initialization time.
+static __thread Context *ctx = nullptr;
+
cjappl wrote:
Thanks for the feedback @brooksdavis and @bsdimp - always hard to tell how
popular or unpopular a change would be, especially from "outside the community"
(aka me not knowing much about the BSD flavors :)
> Sure we can keep it open for a while, still a long road before 21.x anyw
https://github.com/cjappl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125389
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125389
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -43,6 +44,21 @@ static __rtsan::Context &GetContextForThisThreadImpl() {
return *current_thread_context;
}
+#else
+
+// On FreeBSD, pthread api cannot be used as calloc is called under the hood
+// at library initialization time.
cjappl wrote:
Can you el
@@ -43,6 +44,21 @@ static __rtsan::Context &GetContextForThisThreadImpl() {
return *current_thread_context;
}
+#else
+
+// On FreeBSD, pthread api cannot be used as calloc is called under the hood
+// at library initialization time.
+static __thread Context *ctx = nullptr;
+
https://github.com/cjappl commented:
(sorry meant to leave these comments the other day, these comments are separate
from the "should we enable it" discussion)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125389
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@l
cjappl wrote:
> @devnexen in principle, I'm of course not opposed to rtsan supporting FreeBSD
> - is there any motivation in particular for why you propose adding it here?
> Is this the first of many patches that are needed, or is it the only one that
> you can foresee? I'd like to make sure t
https://github.com/cjappl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119904
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119904
This seems to pass tests and behaves as expected.
As suggested by @vitalybuka on #118989
>From 8cfcf0461739e45716be1b3ed6700b5712b7801e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 10:37:1
https://github.com/cjappl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119739
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cjappl wrote:
> > Remove functional pass
>
>
>
> function pass?
Thanks, fixed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119739
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119739
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119739
As suggested by @vitalybuka on #118989
Most of the other sanitizers are now only module level passes. This moves all
functionality into the module pass, and removes the function pass.
>From c19f2f7da960a81e2c8
@@ -1024,12 +1024,14 @@ void EmitAssemblyHelper::RunOptimizationPipeline(
FPM.addPass(BoundsCheckingPass());
});
-if (LangOpts.Sanitize.has(SanitizerKind::Realtime))
+if (LangOpts.Sanitize.has(SanitizerKind::Realtime)) {
cjappl wr
@@ -1024,12 +1024,14 @@ void EmitAssemblyHelper::RunOptimizationPipeline(
FPM.addPass(BoundsCheckingPass());
});
-if (LangOpts.Sanitize.has(SanitizerKind::Realtime))
+if (LangOpts.Sanitize.has(SanitizerKind::Realtime)) {
PB.registerScalarOp
https://github.com/cjappl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119074
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119074
>From 2c882a78ce82801590a6bfd217c8e8b8e4b4c6f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2024 07:45:34 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [rtsan] Add `verify_interceptors` to docs
---
clang/docs/RealtimeS
https://github.com/cjappl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119075
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119075
None
>From 94225043e5e60424bc10fa0b8d33a21228420866 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2024 07:51:45 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [rtsan] NFC: Very small fixes of docs, adding `, adding link
https://github.com/cjappl created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119074
None
>From 649e184e37ba94ac77b840ae4d02213a8fb77ab5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2024 07:45:34 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [rtsan] Add `verify_interceptors` to docs
---
clang/docs/Rea
https://github.com/cjappl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118989
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -25,3 +25,7 @@ attributes #0 = { mustprogress noinline sanitize_realtime
optnone ssp uwtable(sy
; RealtimeSanitizer pass should insert __rtsan_realtime_exit right before
function return
; CHECK: call{{.*}}@__rtsan_realtime_exit
; CHECK-NEXT: ret{{.*}}void
+
+; RealtimeSani
https://github.com/cjappl created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117187
None
>From b5888f70bd1bbefc6a711ef2022478980ed2505f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 08:45:33 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [rtsan] NFC: Update docs with suppress_equal_stacks
---
cla
https://github.com/cjappl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117187
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117086
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117086
These functions recently were helpful for a user, so I decided to add them to
the official docs.
Any feedback on wording or content appreciated as always
>From 056fa6a787efb0721b30fee6e0bdea9843e303d4 Mon Sep
@@ -1259,6 +1263,12 @@ class Analyzer {
return true;
}
+bool TraverseStmt(Stmt *Statement) {
+ if (Statement != TrailingRequiresClause)
cjappl wrote:
Could consider leaving a comment here saying why you skip trailing requires
clauses (some
https://github.com/cjappl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114266
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl commented:
for whatever it's worth - LGTM. Leaving to more experienced heads in this area
to actually approve.
Good sleuthing!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114266
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.
https://github.com/cjappl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114281
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cjappl wrote:
#114331 has been merged, so the test failure is fixed. Going to save the build
machine a workout and submit without a rebase, as this change is very unlikely
to cause any problems
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114281
___
cfe
cjappl wrote:
FYI @jurahul - having a build failure when I try to build docs after this
change. I think a few little bits were missed.
```
Warning, treated as error:
./llvm-project/build/tools/clang/docs/ClangFormattedStatus.rst:document isn't
included in any toctree
```
https://github.com/ll
cjappl wrote:
(doc build failure is unrelated, I will rebase after approval and make sure
that passes):
> Warning, treated as error:
> /home/runner/work/llvm-project/llvm-project/clang-build/tools/clang/docs/index.rst:89:toctree
> contains reference to nonexisting document 'ClangFormattedStatu
https://github.com/cjappl created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114281
As suggested by @fmayer in #113979
>From 8d3e3d29b317a35a06780f8ad2a90f437b6f3bcc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 10:50:30 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [rtsan][NFC] Add 'known to hav
@@ -11,11 +11,16 @@ RealtimeSanitizer (a.k.a. RTSan) is a real-time safety
testing tool for C and C+
projects. RTSan can be used to detect real-time violations, i.e. calls to
methods
that are not safe for use in functions with deterministic run time
requirements.
RTSan consi
cjappl wrote:
CC for review @dougsonos
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113979
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113979
None
>From d2a311863881486fbed6097d6358b096f305377a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 16:17:48 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [rtsan][NFC] Add documentation link to Function Effects
---
https://github.com/cjappl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109855
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113931
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cjappl wrote:
Happy to help. I'll merge this afternoon after the checks are green.
Excited to have these docs up, had many conversations where I've wanted to
refer people to them!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109855
___
cfe-commits mail
cjappl wrote:
@dougsonos let me know if you want to merge this, happy to push the button when
you are OK with it
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109855
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/ma
https://github.com/cjappl created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113931
The links right now show up like:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9e6b3e1f-e78f-46cb-a9f7-8164b6233340";>
([rtsan](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/RealtimeSanitizer.html),
[asan](https://clang.llvm.org/d
https://github.com/cjappl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112727
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -194,12 +198,43 @@ Some issues with flags can be debugged using the
``verbosity=$NUM`` flag:
misspelled_flag
...
-Disabling
--
+Disabling and suppressing
+-
-In some circumstances, you may want to suppress error reporting in a specif
https://github.com/cjappl updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112727
>From 1bdbc3baf8399c4571429cff727bfa9bb260e400 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 08:20:08 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [rtsan][NFC] Documentation of suppression flag
---
clang/docs
@@ -194,12 +198,43 @@ Some issues with flags can be debugged using the
``verbosity=$NUM`` flag:
misspelled_flag
...
-Disabling
--
+Disabling and suppressing
+-
-In some circumstances, you may want to suppress error reporting in a specif
@@ -194,12 +198,43 @@ Some issues with flags can be debugged using the
``verbosity=$NUM`` flag:
misspelled_flag
...
-Disabling
--
+Disabling and suppressing
+-
-In some circumstances, you may want to suppress error reporting in a specif
https://github.com/cjappl closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79899
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112727
>From 37a1728dde2cad21b9f851268c1625b7ef2dc338 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 08:20:08 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [rtsan][NFC] Documentation of suppression flag
---
clang/docs
cjappl wrote:
Thanks for the quick fix, working for me after I pulled latest main.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113255
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112727
>From c8b2090824d19618e876051cfcc18a4fad49649d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 08:20:08 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [rtsan][NFC] Documentation of suppression flag
---
clang/docs
@@ -194,12 +198,43 @@ Some issues with flags can be debugged using the
``verbosity=$NUM`` flag:
misspelled_flag
...
-Disabling
--
+Disabling and suppressing
+-
-In some circumstances, you may want to suppress error reporting in a specif
cjappl wrote:
Closing
This should be split into multiple reviews that do one small atomic thing.
The reviews should have good descriptions and tests.
You should try to minimize white space and formatting changes.
Feel free to resubmit if you think these changes still need to be made.
https://g
cjappl wrote:
Just a heads up, I think this broke documentation builds. After bisecting it
points to this commit.
```
ninja -C build docs-clang-html
FAILED: tools/clang/docs/CMakeFiles/docs-clang-html
~/code/radsan_cjappl/llvm-project/build/tools/clang/docs/CMakeFiles/docs-clang-html
cd ~/code
cjappl wrote:
(test failure seems unrelated, but I will ensure it's green before I submit
after I get approval, going to rebase now)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112727
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists
https://github.com/cjappl approved this pull request.
LGTM - would love some eyes from more established folks to make sure we are not
breaking any bw-compatability foo, and seeing as this spans the tree a bit.
Definitely I am for this change, I think the attr is more clear this way, and
we cau
https://github.com/cjappl updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112727
>From c8b2090824d19618e876051cfcc18a4fad49649d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 08:20:08 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [rtsan][NFC] Documentation of suppression flag
---
clang/docs
@@ -194,12 +198,43 @@ Some issues with flags can be debugged using the
``verbosity=$NUM`` flag:
misspelled_flag
...
-Disabling
--
+Disabling and suppressing
+-
-In some circumstances, you may want to suppress error reporting in a specif
@@ -194,12 +198,43 @@ Some issues with flags can be debugged using the
``verbosity=$NUM`` flag:
misspelled_flag
...
-Disabling
--
+Disabling and suppressing
+-
-In some circumstances, you may want to suppress error reporting in a specif
@@ -194,12 +198,43 @@ Some issues with flags can be debugged using the
``verbosity=$NUM`` flag:
misspelled_flag
...
-Disabling
--
+Disabling and suppressing
+-
-In some circumstances, you may want to suppress error reporting in a specif
https://github.com/cjappl created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112727
None
>From c8b2090824d19618e876051cfcc18a4fad49649d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 08:20:08 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [rtsan][NFC] Documentation of suppression flag
---
clang/do
cjappl wrote:
> @dougsonos Maybe you should ask for commit access since you’ll likely be
> contributing more patches to this in the future as I understand it?
>
>
>
> CC @AaronBallman Does that still work like it used to or did your maintainers
> rfc change something about that too?
A few d
https://github.com/cjappl approved this pull request.
LGTM.
Will let a little time pass to let Sirraide chime in, because this section of
the code isn't my forte. If you want this merged ASAP @dougsonos and you feel
confident in it, ping me and I can merge.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-proje
https://github.com/cjappl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111249
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111249
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -58,31 +58,71 @@ code.
return 0;
}
# Compile and link
- % clang++ -fsanitize=realtime -g example_realtime_violation.cpp
+ % clang++ -fsanitize=realtime example_realtime_violation.cpp
If a real-time safety violation is detected in a ``[[clang::nonblocking]]`
https://github.com/cjappl approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111249
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111055
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl approved this pull request.
Will wait to merge for a bit to let others chime in, but LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111055
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/
https://github.com/cjappl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110296
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110296
>From eb8712a4eb82495a84e593c375f787017380de40 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 09:40:11 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [rtsan] Update docs to include run-time flags
---
clang/docs/
@@ -0,0 +1,503 @@
+
+Function Effect Analysis
+
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Clang Function Effect Analysis is a C++ language extension which can warn
about "unsafe"
+constructs. The feature is currently tailored for the Perform
@@ -84,6 +84,75 @@ non-zero exit code.
#14 0x0001958960dc ()
#15 0x2f557ffc ()
+Run-time flags
+--
+
+RealtimeSanitizer supports a number of run-time flags, which can be specified
in the ``RTSAN_OPTIONS`` environment variable:
+
+.. code-block::
https://github.com/cjappl updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110296
>From eb8712a4eb82495a84e593c375f787017380de40 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 09:40:11 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [rtsan] Update docs to include run-time flags
---
clang/docs/
https://github.com/cjappl created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110296
None
>From 128f414de9f19596e81db6afe5e1d0b166888775 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 09:40:11 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [rtsan] Update docs to include run-time flags
---
clang/doc
cjappl wrote:
CC for review @davidtrevelyan
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110296
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110296
>From eb8712a4eb82495a84e593c375f787017380de40 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 09:40:11 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [rtsan] Update docs to include run-time flags
---
clang/docs/Real
cjappl wrote:
And if he is interested to review/stay up to date on our docs @dougsonos for
review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110296
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
@@ -0,0 +1,503 @@
+
+Function Effect Analysis
+
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Clang Function Effect Analysis is a C++ language extension which can warn
about "unsafe"
+constructs. The feature is currently tailored for the Perform
@@ -0,0 +1,503 @@
+
+Function Effect Analysis
+
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Clang Function Effect Analysis is a C++ language extension which can warn
about "unsafe"
+constructs. The feature is currently tailored for the Perform
@@ -0,0 +1,503 @@
+
+Function Effect Analysis
+
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Clang Function Effect Analysis is a C++ language extension which can warn
about "unsafe"
+constructs. The feature is currently tailored for the Perform
@@ -0,0 +1,503 @@
+
+Function Effect Analysis
+
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Clang Function Effect Analysis is a C++ language extension which can warn
about "unsafe"
+constructs. The feature is currently tailored for the Perform
https://github.com/cjappl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109855
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,503 @@
+
+Function Effect Analysis
+
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Clang Function Effect Analysis is a C++ language extension which can warn
about "unsafe"
+constructs. The feature is currently tailored for the Perform
@@ -0,0 +1,503 @@
+
+Function Effect Analysis
+
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Clang Function Effect Analysis is a C++ language extension which can warn
about "unsafe"
+constructs. The feature is currently tailored for the Perform
@@ -0,0 +1,503 @@
+
+Function Effect Analysis
+
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Clang Function Effect Analysis is a C++ language extension which can warn
about "unsafe"
+constructs. The feature is currently tailored for the Perform
@@ -0,0 +1,503 @@
+
+Function Effect Analysis
+
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Clang Function Effect Analysis is a C++ language extension which can warn
about "unsafe"
+constructs. The feature is currently tailored for the Perform
https://github.com/cjappl approved this pull request.
Overall, very thorough. I would wait for more eyes but this LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109855
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-b
@@ -0,0 +1,503 @@
+
+Function Effect Analysis
+
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Clang Function Effect Analysis is a C++ language extension which can warn
about "unsafe"
+constructs. The feature is currently tailored for the Perform
@@ -0,0 +1,503 @@
+
+Function Effect Analysis
+
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Clang Function Effect Analysis is a C++ language extension which can warn
about "unsafe"
cjappl wrote:
May be worth documenting how t
@@ -0,0 +1,503 @@
+
+Function Effect Analysis
+
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Clang Function Effect Analysis is a C++ language extension which can warn
about "unsafe"
cjappl wrote:
It is not only C++, but also w
@@ -0,0 +1,503 @@
+
+Function Effect Analysis
+
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Clang Function Effect Analysis is a C++ language extension which can warn
about "unsafe"
+constructs. The feature is currently tailored for the Perform
@@ -0,0 +1,503 @@
+
+Function Effect Analysis
+
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Clang Function Effect Analysis is a C++ language extension which can warn
about "unsafe"
+constructs. The feature is currently tailored for the Perform
1 - 100 of 235 matches
Mail list logo
