https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87912
>From 4a60eb0da7d74ca002040aede6ffc9220314ca33 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 12:35:07 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Introduce `SemaHLSL`
---
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87914
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
clang-format 18.1.1 that we use in the workflow is complaining, because it's
missing #82097.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87912
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87912
This patch introduces `SemaHLSL` class, and moves some HLSL-related functions
there. No functional changes intended.
This is a part of the effort to split `Sema` into smaller manageable parts, and
follows the
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87909
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87909
This patch covers
[CWG393](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/393.html) "Pointer to array of
unknown bound in template argument list in parameter"
[CWG528](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/528.html)
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86960
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87634
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87876
This patch covers
[CWG605](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/605.html) "Linkage of explicit
specializations",
[CWG650](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/650.html) "Order of destruction
for temporaries
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87869
This is a follow-up to #81506. As discussed in #87737, we're rejecting
incomplete types, save for exceptions listed in the C++ standard (`void` and
arrays of unknown bound). Note that arrays of unknown bound of
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87634
>From 311e2ef14dda46686b473e813028a2c3b2ac1254 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 16:07:35 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][NFC] Introduce `SemaBase`
This is a follow-up to
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87748
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87744
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87737
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -12252,6 +12252,8 @@ def warn_acc_clause_unimplemented
def err_acc_construct_appertainment
: Error<"OpenACC construct '%0' cannot be used here; it can only "
"be used in a statement context">;
+def err_acc_clause_appertainment
+: Error<"OpenACC '%1'
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
I hope #87634 will be merged soon, so you can get rid of `SemaRef.Diag()` here.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87821
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -3594,11 +3595,26 @@ class Parser : public CodeCompletionHandler {
OpenACCDirectiveKind DirKind;
SourceLocation StartLoc;
SourceLocation EndLoc;
-// TODO OpenACC: Add Clause list here once we have a type for that.
+SmallVector Clauses;
// TODO
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87821
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87737
>From ef24f642ca78d357018d6023fb3d9011f115299b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 06:22:35 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Reject VLAs in `__is_layout_compatible()`
This
@@ -1741,8 +1741,10 @@ void is_layout_compatible(int n)
static_assert(!__is_layout_compatible(unsigned char, signed char));
static_assert(__is_layout_compatible(int[], int[]));
static_assert(__is_layout_compatible(int[2], int[2]));
-
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85904
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1741,8 +1741,10 @@ void is_layout_compatible(int n)
static_assert(!__is_layout_compatible(unsigned char, signed char));
static_assert(__is_layout_compatible(int[], int[]));
static_assert(__is_layout_compatible(int[2], int[2]));
-
@@ -1698,6 +1698,9 @@ class Sema final {
ChangedStateAtExit
};
+ void DiagnoseMissingFormatAttributes(const FunctionDecl *FDecl,
Endilll wrote:
This declaration is placed among functions implemented in `SemaAttr.cpp`, as
you might see around line
https://github.com/Endilll requested changes to this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70024
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70024
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
> However, at the language level, I cannot find any wording either way.
In my reading, http://eel.is/c++draft/basic.types.general#11 makes any type
layout-compatible with itself, and even ignores cv-qualification:
> Two types cv1 T1 and cv2 T2 are [layout-compatible
>
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87752
[CWG593](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/593.html) "Falling off the end
of a destructor's function-try-block handler". As usual with CWG issues
resolved as NAD, we test for status-quo confirmed by CWG.
Endilll wrote:
> I think the current behavior is reasonable-ish. Rejecting specific types is a
> bit weird... I think VLA should model incomplete types (but we currently
> don't reject that either, which is a bug)
>
> IE, I would expect __is_layout_compatible to return false in the presence
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87748
[CWG466](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/466.html) "cv-qualifiers on
pseudo-destructor type".
Richard claimed that we don't implement this DR because of one ill-formed
example being accepted:
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87744
>From 4a666d69a49386a6cd282ed112963b3d049fd3c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 07:57:11 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Add test for CWG392
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87744
[CWG392](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/392.html) "Use of full
expression lvalue before temporary destruction". We're testing that `operator
bool()` is called before destructor of `C`.
I'm also marking
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87737
This is a follow-up to #81506. Since `__is_layout_compatible()` is a C++
intrinsic
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87274
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
I can land this for you after CI passes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70594
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
You might want to include a test from
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/85256#issuecomment-2031815104
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70594
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/Endilll approved this pull request.
LGTM!
Disclosure: me and author extensively reviewed this offline before publishing.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87274
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84184
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84184
>From 23f4208fb9978370f59cae16db0747acb3e2c906 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 18:01:35 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [clang] Factor out OpenACC part of `Sema`
This patch
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86801
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
> Will these changes find their way into a 18.x release?
Not without someone stepping up and getting them through backporting process.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85571
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86618
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84184
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84184
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+//===- SemaOpenACC.h - Semantic Analysis for OpenACC constructs
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+//===- SemaOpenACC.h - Semantic Analysis for OpenACC constructs
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84184
>From 23f4208fb9978370f59cae16db0747acb3e2c906 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 18:01:35 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [clang] Factor out OpenACC part of `Sema`
This patch
Endilll wrote:
I added convenience functions to access `ASTContext` and other widely used
facilities of `Sema` to `SemaOpenACC`. I intentionally didn't go full base
class approach, saving this option for the future.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84184
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84184
>From 23f4208fb9978370f59cae16db0747acb3e2c906 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 18:01:35 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [clang] Factor out OpenACC part of `Sema`
This patch
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84050
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
I'm not able to review Sema.h changes because of a merge conflict.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70024
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
This looks good.
Sorry for the late reply.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85571
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85605
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80040
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85032
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
> This is an early PR to solicit comments on the overall approach and a number
> of outstanding questions.
You should advertise this elsewhere (e.g. in RFC thread), or remove the draft
status so that reviewers can see this as something they should provide feedback
on.
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good to me. Thank you for putting new functions in all
the right places!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84983
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79035
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+//===- SemaOpenACC.h - Semantic Analysis for OpenACC constructs
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84184
>From 23f4208fb9978370f59cae16db0747acb3e2c906 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 18:01:35 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang] Factor out OpenACC part of `Sema`
This patch
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+//===- SemaOpenACC.h - Semantic Analysis for OpenACC constructs
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
@@ -1162,6 +1162,11 @@ class Sema final {
/// CurContext - This is the current declaration context of parsing.
DeclContext *CurContext;
+ SemaOpenACC () {
Endilll wrote:
I'm not too keen to adhere to our style guide here, as this adds noise for
users
Endilll wrote:
Changes to `Sema.h` look good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84459
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82310
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84313
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1162,6 +1162,11 @@ class Sema final {
/// CurContext - This is the current declaration context of parsing.
DeclContext *CurContext;
+ SemaOpenACC () {
+assert(OpenACCPtr);
Endilll wrote:
Given that moving a hot path getter to out-of-line
Endilll wrote:
Physical separation of parts of `Sema` while improving incremental compile
times means we have to rely on forward declarations, which lead to additional
level of indirection at runtime in the form of `Sema` containing pointers to
its components, and components containing a
@@ -19185,7 +19185,7 @@ static bool isLayoutCompatible(ASTContext , EnumDecl
*ED1, EnumDecl *ED2) {
/// Check if two fields are layout-compatible.
Endilll wrote:
After an offline discussion, we agreed to keep the boolean, and to add an
additional assert to
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84313
>From 491fc16c777aff8b22893da1cdeb8d137cf28871 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 15:16:35 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang] Respect field alignment when evaluating layout
@@ -19185,7 +19185,7 @@ static bool isLayoutCompatible(ASTContext , EnumDecl
*ED1, EnumDecl *ED2) {
/// Check if two fields are layout-compatible.
Endilll wrote:
Good catch! CWG2586 I implement here basically establish a different set of
rules for layout
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84313
>From 491fc16c777aff8b22893da1cdeb8d137cf28871 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 15:16:35 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang] Respect field alignment when evaluating layout
@@ -19185,7 +19185,8 @@ static bool isLayoutCompatible(ASTContext , EnumDecl
*ED1, EnumDecl *ED2) {
/// Check if two fields are layout-compatible.
static bool isLayoutCompatible(ASTContext , FieldDecl *Field1,
- FieldDecl *Field2) {
+
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84313
>From 491fc16c777aff8b22893da1cdeb8d137cf28871 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 15:16:35 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Respect field alignment when evaluating layout
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84303
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78000
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84303
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84303
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++98 %s -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -emit-llvm -o -
-fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors | llvm-cxxfilt -n | FileCheck %s
--check-prefixes CHECK
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 %s -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -emit-llvm -o -
@@ -1996,6 +1996,30 @@ Here is an example:
}];
}
+def AssumeDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatStmt;
+ let Heading = "assume";
+ let Content = [{
+The ``assume`` attribute is used to indicate to the optimizer that a
+certain condition can be assumed to be true
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84313
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84313
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84313
This patch implements
[CWG2586](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2583.html) "Common initial
sequence should consider over-alignment". Note that alignment of union members
doesn't have to match, as layout
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84303
This patch covers
[CWG519](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/519.html) "Null pointer
preservation in `void*` conversions",
[CWG571](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/571.html) "References declared
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84184
>From 23f4208fb9978370f59cae16db0747acb3e2c906 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 18:01:35 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang] Factor out OpenACC part of `Sema`
This patch
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77890
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84193
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
Can you resolve merge conflicts, so that I can review changes to `Sema.h`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78000
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81014
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84184
>From 23f4208fb9978370f59cae16db0747acb3e2c906 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 18:01:35 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang] Factor out OpenACC part of `Sema`
This patch
@@ -63,17 +67,17 @@ void Sema::ActOnOpenACCConstruct(OpenACCDirectiveKind K,
// here as these constructs do not take any arguments.
break;
default:
-Diag(StartLoc, diag::warn_acc_construct_unimplemented) << K;
+Sema.Diag(StartLoc,
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84184
This patch moves OpenACC parts of `Sema` into a separate class `SemaOpenACC`
that is placed in a separate header `Sema/SemaOpenACC.h`. This patch is
intended to be a model of factoring things out of `Sema`, so
Stefan =?utf-8?q?Gränitz?= ,
Stefan =?utf-8?q?Gränitz?= ,
Stefan =?utf-8?q?Gränitz?= ,
Stefan =?utf-8?q?Gränitz?= ,
Stefan =?utf-8?q?Gränitz?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Endilll wrote:
Can you please update your branch with `main`? I'd like to make sure that your
new functions in `Sema`
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82217
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83715
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++98 %s -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -emit-llvm -o -
-fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors | llvm-cxxfilt -n | FileCheck %s
--check-prefixes CHECK
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 %s -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -emit-llvm -o -
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++98 %s -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -emit-llvm -o -
-fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors | llvm-cxxfilt -n | FileCheck %s
--check-prefixes CHECK
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 %s -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -emit-llvm -o -
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83715
>From 59a558a653098c1b96b47cffc62b1f3bf1cb92d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2024 12:21:17 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang] Add some CodeGen tests for CWG 4xx issues
This
https://github.com/Endilll approved this pull request.
I used a different approach for CWG292 test that avoids passing
`-fsized-deallocation` in 98 and 11 modes, as this is not a conforming mode for
them. Now changes to DR tests look good :) I hope you don't mind me pushing
commits to your
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83774
>From 26245679b0f40b510e628aaed091739e9931c29c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: wangpc
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 10:38:14 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang] Enable sized deallocation by default in C++14
onwards
Endilll wrote:
Bulk formatting of Clang is still under discussion in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-format-all-the-things/76614. At least I
don't see a consensus called there one way or another.
Our [developer policy](https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html) states the
following:
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83715
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
401 - 500 of 1269 matches
Mail list logo
