This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
nwilson marked an inline comment as done.
Closed by commit rL259159: [Concepts] Implement a portion of Concepts
TS[dcl.spec.concept]p5 and p6: (authored by nwilson).
Changed prior to commit:
hubert.reinterpretcast accepted this revision.
hubert.reinterpretcast added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16163
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
nwilson updated this revision to Diff 45453.
nwilson added a comment.
- Take qualifiers into account.
- Check `VarDecl` is valid when checking declaration type to account for
`constexpr` being specified. Is there any opinion on a better way to handle
this? I *could* check for both diagnostics
nwilson marked an inline comment as done.
Comment at: test/CXX/concepts-ts/dcl.dcl/dcl.spec/dcl.spec.concept/p5.cpp:22
@@ +21,3 @@
+template
+concept float fcrtf() { return 5.5; } // expected-error {{declared return type
of function concept must be 'bool'}}
+
nwilson added a comment.
Please let me know if the subject or summary of this Patch is ambiguous.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16163
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
