Anastasia added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D20979#452616, @yaxunl wrote:
> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D20979#452463, @Anastasia wrote:
>
> > Looking good generally, I am just not sure about mixing two different
> > representations.
>
>
> If we choose only one form of representation,
yaxunl added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D20979#452463, @Anastasia wrote:
> Looking good generally, I am just not sure about mixing two different
> representations.
If we choose only one form of representation, would you suggest to use function
metadata or function attribute?
Anastasia added a comment.
Looking good generally, I am just not sure about mixing two different
representations.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D20979
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
yaxunl created this revision.
yaxunl added reviewers: Anastasia, bader, pxli168.
yaxunl added subscribers: cfe-commits, tstellarAMD.
This patch attempts to use target-dependent function attribute to represent
reqd_work_group_size, work_group_size_hint and vector_type_hint kernel
attributes and
