This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL284112: [analyzer] Link libStaticAnalyzerCheckers to
libASTMatchers. (authored by dergachev).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D25429?vs=74109=74497#toc
Repository:
rL LLVM
zaks.anna added a comment.
I am in support of this as well.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D25429
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
alexfh added a comment.
The change seems to be reasonable, and the size increase is not huge. However,
I'm not sure who should make the call.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D25429
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
xazax.hun added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D25429#565940, @NoQ wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D25429#565939, @xazax.hun wrote:
>
> > I might be confused, but as far as I remember, when you do static linking,
> > symbols tend to be linked in lazily. So as long as you do not use
NoQ added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D25429#565939, @xazax.hun wrote:
> I might be confused, but as far as I remember, when you do static linking,
> symbols tend to be linked in lazily. So as long as you do not use the
> matchers, those numbers might be misleading.
Yep, i did
xazax.hun added a comment.
I might be confused, but as far as I remember, when you do static linking,
symbols tend to be linked in lazily. So as long as you do not use the matchers,
those numbers might be misleading.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D25429
NoQ created this revision.
NoQ added reviewers: zaks.anna, dcoughlin, xazax.hun, a.sidorin, alexfh.
NoQ added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
Herald added subscribers: mgorny, beanz.
ASTMatchers are sometimes handy in the Analyzer, and there are more patches to
make use of them.
However, it turns
