[PATCH] D33499: [PPC] PPC32/Darwin ABI info

ken-cunningham-webuse added a comment. I found the relevant recent discussions on the mailing list, and the commits from August that started the Darwin PPC withdrawal from the source. I have this patch in my local folder of llvm/darwinppc fixes. I suppose this ticket might be closed then? Re

[PATCH] D33499: [PPC] PPC32/Darwin ABI info

ken-cunningham-webuse added a comment. I saw that idea floated but didn't see that it was accepted. I don't know exactly how much interest there is in darwin PPC. There are new tickets about Darwin PPC within the past few months. I see plenty of questions about it on the MacPorts boards. I hav

[PATCH] D33499: [PPC] PPC32/Darwin ABI info

iains added a comment. Since that's my understanding too - I am (slowly) bringing my patches forward to 7.0 - at the moment testing the MC layer changes on powerpc-darwin9 (looking reasonable, as an assembler for GCC, so far). When things are "ready" (at least not broken as far as I can tell)

[PATCH] D33499: [PPC] PPC32/Darwin ABI info

nemanjai added a comment. In D33499#1341236 , @ken-cunningham-webuse wrote: > @iains - I have interest in resolving this issue, and also a couple of other > lingering bugs in the PPC32Darwin ABI realm. If you have your WIP available > anywhere, I'd be h

[PATCH] D33499: [PPC] PPC32/Darwin ABI info

ken-cunningham-webuse added a comment. Herald added subscribers: llvm-commits, jsji. @iains - I have interest in resolving this issue, and also a couple of other lingering bugs in the PPC32Darwin ABI realm. If you have your WIP available anywhere, I'd be happy to have a go at bringing it up to c

[PATCH] D33499: [PPC] PPC32/Darwin ABI info

kparzysz added a comment. Great! Thanks. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D33499 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[PATCH] D33499: [PPC] PPC32/Darwin ABI info

iains added a comment. This seems like a reasonable start, and is a step forward. For the VAArgs, this will be self-consistent, but to be compliant with the system ABI, I think you'll need to account the different padding rules for small aggregates, as per pp14 of "Mac_OS_X_ABI_Function_Calls".

[PATCH] D33499: [PPC] PPC32/Darwin ABI info

nemanjai added subscribers: iains, echristo. nemanjai added a comment. I'm not sure how much expertise there is for PPC32-Darwin. Perhaps @iains might be able to offer some insight here. Also, @echristo might have a thing or two to say in this regard. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llv

[PATCH] D33499: [PPC] PPC32/Darwin ABI info

kparzysz added a comment. Ping. The bug reporter has verified that this patch fixes the problem. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D33499 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li

[PATCH] D33499: [PPC] PPC32/Darwin ABI info

kparzysz updated this revision to Diff 100720. kparzysz retitled this revision from "[PPC] First approximation of PPC32/Darwin ABI info" to "[PPC] PPC32/Darwin ABI info". kparzysz edited the summary of this revision. kparzysz added a comment. This patch corrects the ABI alignment issues for argum