lichray added inline comments.
Comment at: include/ostream:225
+basic_ostream& operator<<(nullptr_t)
+{ return *this << (const void*)0; }
+
K-ballo wrote:
> Quuxplusone wrote:
> > mclow.lists wrote:
> > > lichray wrote:
> > > > Oh, common, I persuaded
K-ballo added inline comments.
Comment at: include/ostream:225
+basic_ostream& operator<<(nullptr_t)
+{ return *this << (const void*)0; }
+
Quuxplusone wrote:
> mclow.lists wrote:
> > lichray wrote:
> > > Oh, common, I persuaded the committee to allow
Quuxplusone added inline comments.
Comment at: include/ostream:225
+basic_ostream& operator<<(nullptr_t)
+{ return *this << (const void*)0; }
+
mclow.lists wrote:
> lichray wrote:
> > Oh, common, I persuaded the committee to allow you to print a `(null)`
mclow.lists added a comment.
Other than the actual text being output, this LGTM.
I'ld like to see the changes I suggested in the test go in, but they're really
minor.
Comment at: include/ostream:225
+basic_ostream& operator<<(nullptr_t)
+{ return *this << (const
lichray added inline comments.
Comment at: include/ostream:225
+basic_ostream& operator<<(nullptr_t)
+{ return *this << (const void*)0; }
+
Oh, common, I persuaded the committee to allow you to print a `(null)` and you
don't do it...
K-ballo created this revision.
With effects equivalent to `os << (const void*)nullptr`.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33776
Files:
include/ostream
test/std/input.output/iostream.format/output.streams/ostream.formatted/ostream.inserters.arithmetic/nullptr_t.pass.cpp
www/cxx1z_status.html
