Quuxplusone updated this revision to Diff 109678.
Quuxplusone added a comment.
I've updated https://reviews.llvm.org/D35863 to be actually correct AFAICT from
my local testing; but I'm not sure what's the most appropriate way to get
"fancy allocator" tests into libcxx's test suite. The way I did
EricWF requested changes to this revision.
EricWF added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
First, this patch would need tests before continuing, Could you please them?
The list tests live under `test/std/containers/sequences/list`. Let me know if
you have any questions or
Quuxplusone created this revision.
`pointer_traits::to_pointer(r)` is not required to return a deallocatable
pointer; indeed generally it *cannot* determine a deallocatable representation
without help from the allocator. Therefore, we must not rely on representations
derived from `to_pointer` w
