aaron.ballman closed this revision.
aaron.ballman added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D43750#1085780, @rsmith wrote:
> I'm really sad about this; C++11 attributes were supposed to fix the
> undisciplined "do what I mean" behavior of GNU attributes. But you're right,
> these really are
rsmith accepted this revision.
rsmith added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
I'm really sad about this; C++11 attributes were supposed to fix the
undisciplined "do what I mean" behavior of GNU attributes. But you're right,
these really are type attributes, and really s
aaron.ballman added a comment.
Ping x4
https://reviews.llvm.org/D43750
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
aaron.ballman added a comment.
Ping
https://reviews.llvm.org/D43750
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
aaron.ballman added a comment.
Ping.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D43750
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
aaron.ballman added a comment.
Ping
https://reviews.llvm.org/D43750
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
aaron.ballman created this revision.
aaron.ballman added a reviewer: rsmith.
Calling convention attributes notionally appertain to the function type -- they
modify the mangling of the function, change the behavior of assignment
operations, etc. However, they're not currently allowed to be writte
