dberris added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D46998#1103397, @dblaikie wrote:
> "In the future we can revisit this when we have a better idea as to why not
> depending on the C++ ABI functionality is a better solution." - this was
> discussed previously in the thread linked from the
dblaikie added a comment.
"In the future we can revisit this when we have a better idea as to why not
depending on the C++ ABI functionality is a better solution." - this was
discussed previously in the thread linked from the bug.
A big thing, so far as I understand it, is that Clang doesn't
dberris created this revision.
dberris added reviewers: dblaikie, echristo.
This is related to http://llvm.org/PR32274.
When building with XRay, always depend on a C++ standard library.
We're doing this to automate the linking of the C++ ABI functionality
that the modes use by default. In
