kcc added a comment.
I think you can safely abandon this change in favor of
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54604 -- please join the review there.
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54473
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm
glider added inline comments.
Comment at: include/clang/Basic/Sanitizers.def:163
+// Initialize local variables.
+SANITIZER("init-locals", InitLocals)
+
lebedev.ri wrote:
> Unless i'm mistaken, I suspect you may see some surprising behavior here,
> unfortunately
glider added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54473#1297460, @kcc wrote:
> This new flag inhibits the warnings from -Wuninitialized, right?
> While this is fine for experimenting (and I want to have this in ToT to
> enable wide experimentation)
> we should clearly state (in the comment
kcc added a comment.
This new flag inhibits the warnings from -Wuninitialized, right?
While this is fine for experimenting (and I want to have this in ToT to enable
wide experimentation)
we should clearly state (in the comments) that the final intent is to make the
feature work together with -W
lebedev.ri added inline comments.
Comment at: include/clang/Basic/Sanitizers.def:163
+// Initialize local variables.
+SANITIZER("init-locals", InitLocals)
+
Unless i'm mistaken, I suspect you may see some surprising behavior here,
unfortunately.
[[ https://bugs.
glider created this revision.
glider added reviewers: kcc, rjmccall, rsmith.
Herald added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
This patch adds a new feature, -fsanitize=init-locals, which generates zero
initializers for uninitialized local variables.
There's been discussions in the security community abou
