[PATCH] D65379: [analyzer][NFC] Refactoring BugReporter.cpp P2.: Clean up the construction of bug paths and finding a valid report

2019-08-13 Thread Kristóf Umann via Phabricator via cfe-commits
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rL368694: [analyzer][NFC] Refactoring BugReporter.cpp P2.: Clean up the construction of… (authored by Szelethus, committed by ). Herald added a project: LLVM. Herald added a subscriber: llvm-commits.

[PATCH] D65379: [analyzer][NFC] Refactoring BugReporter.cpp P2.: Clean up the construction of bug paths and finding a valid report

2019-08-01 Thread Kristóf Umann via Phabricator via cfe-commits
Szelethus updated this revision to Diff 212806. Szelethus marked 2 inline comments as done. Szelethus added a comment. clang-format, rephrase the comment. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D65379/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D65379 Files:

[PATCH] D65379: [analyzer][NFC] Refactoring BugReporter.cpp P2.: Clean up the construction of bug paths and finding a valid report

2019-07-29 Thread Gábor Horváth via Phabricator via cfe-commits
xazax.hun accepted this revision. xazax.hun added a comment. Looks good, some nits inline. I agree with Artem, we should consider omitting the trimming and document how to get something similar if desired for debugging. Just a random idea: maybe the original purpose of the trimming was to be

[PATCH] D65379: [analyzer][NFC] Refactoring BugReporter.cpp P2.: Clean up the construction of bug paths and finding a valid report

2019-07-29 Thread Artem Dergachev via Phabricator via cfe-commits
NoQ accepted this revision. NoQ added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. If only somebody could explain to me why do even need trimming in the first place :/ I was only keeping it around for easier exploded graph dumps reading, but these days we can trivially replace