jcsxky wrote:
> So After we have formed a TemplateSpecializationType, we are done with the
> NNS. We keep it around in an ElaboratedType for type sugar only, it should
> not be needed to compile the program correctly anymore.
>
> So I think this solution violates one important aspect of our
https://github.com/mizvekov commented:
So After we have formed a TemplateSpecializationType, we are done with the NNS.
We keep it around in an ElaboratedType for type sugar only, it should not be
needed to compile the program correctly anymore.
So I think this solution violates one important
mizvekov wrote:
> > The problem here is the loss of the qualification on the TemplateNames
> > This patch fixes the problem, without taking any workarounds: #93433
> > It also doesn't cause any change in diagnostics in
> > `clang/test/SemaTemplate/typename-specifier-3.cpp`.
>
> I think we
https://github.com/jcsxky closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93411
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
jcsxky wrote:
> The problem here is the loss of the qualification on the TemplateNames
>
> This patch fixes the problem, without taking any workarounds: #93433
>
> It also doesn't cause any change in diagnostics in
> `clang/test/SemaTemplate/typename-specifier-3.cpp`.
I think we should
https://github.com/mizvekov commented:
The problem here is the loss of the qualification on the TemplateNames
This patch fixes the problem, without taking any workarounds:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93433
It also doesn't cause any change in diagnostics in
@@ -7216,9 +7216,30 @@
TreeTransform::TransformElaboratedType(TypeLocBuilder ,
return QualType();
}
- QualType NamedT = getDerived().TransformType(TLB, TL.getNamedTypeLoc());
- if (NamedT.isNull())
-return QualType();
+ QualType NamedT;
+ if
@@ -28,16 +28,17 @@ namespace PR12884_original {
typedef int arg;
};
struct C {
- typedef B::X x; // precxx17-warning{{missing 'typename'
prior to dependent type name B::X; implicit 'typename' is a C++20 extension}}
zyn0217 wrote:
A
@@ -7216,9 +7216,30 @@
TreeTransform::TransformElaboratedType(TypeLocBuilder ,
return QualType();
}
- QualType NamedT = getDerived().TransformType(TLB, TL.getNamedTypeLoc());
- if (NamedT.isNull())
-return QualType();
+ QualType NamedT;
+ if
https://github.com/jcsxky updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93411
>From f5f0b14945a70e3e4fd92d5e5cbdb428334fe2b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qizhi Hu <836744...@qq.com>
Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 16:30:27 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang][Sema] Use correct TemplateName when
https://github.com/jcsxky updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93411
>From f5f0b14945a70e3e4fd92d5e5cbdb428334fe2b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qizhi Hu <836744...@qq.com>
Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 16:30:27 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang][Sema] Use correct TemplateName when
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Qizhi Hu (jcsxky)
Changes
Consider the following testcase:
```cpp
namespace PR12884_original {
template typename T struct A {
struct B { ##1
template typename U struct X {};
typedef int arg;
};
struct C {
https://github.com/jcsxky created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93411
Consider the following testcase:
```cpp
namespace PR12884_original {
template struct A {
struct B { ##1
template struct X {};
typedef int arg;
};
struct C {
typedef B::X x;
13 matches
Mail list logo
