MaskRay wrote:
I plan to revert this workaround soon.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69240
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MaskRay edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69240
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MaskRay edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69240
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MaskRay edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69240
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -66,6 +66,11 @@ using namespace clang;
using namespace CodeGen;
using namespace llvm;
+static llvm::cl::opt ClSanitizeAlignmentBuiltin(
+"sanitize-alignment-builtin", llvm::cl::Hidden,
+llvm::cl::desc("Instrument builtin functions for -fsanitize=alignment"),
+
@@ -66,6 +66,11 @@ using namespace clang;
using namespace CodeGen;
using namespace llvm;
+static llvm::cl::opt ClSanitizeAlignmentBuiltin(
+"sanitize-alignment-builtin", llvm::cl::Hidden,
+llvm::cl::desc("Instrument builtin functions for -fsanitize=alignment"),
+
https://github.com/MaskRay closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69240
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vitalybuka wrote:
Either way seems fine, but ignore list looks more usually to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69240
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69240
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
MaskRay wrote:
> > For reference, can you give a couple examples of code where this is
> > triggering?
> > If this is triggering in practice, do we want a real driver option to
> > control the sanitizer? The alignment attributes themselves?
> I am not sure we need special driver flag for
vitalybuka wrote:
> For reference, can you give a couple examples of code where this is
> triggering?
>
> If this is triggering in practice, do we want a real driver option to control
> the sanitizer? The alignment attributes themselves?
I am not sure we need special driver flag for that.
efriedma-quic wrote:
For reference, can you give a couple examples of code where this is triggering?
If this is triggering in practice, do we want a real driver option to control
the sanitizer? The alignment attributes themselves?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69240
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Fangrui Song (MaskRay)
Changes
Deploying #67766 to a large internal codebase uncovers many bugs (many
are
probably benign but need cleaning up). There are also issues in high-profile
open-source projects like v8. Add a cl::opt to
https://github.com/MaskRay created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69240
Deploying #67766 to a large internal codebase uncovers many bugs (many are
probably benign but need cleaning up). There are also issues in high-profile
open-source projects like v8. Add a cl::opt to disable
14 matches
Mail list logo