huhu233 wrote:
> Why does this need special handling in CGP instead of being a normal custom
> lowering for FLDEXP?
@nikic , thanks for your suggestion, I'll update the patch as soon!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67552
___
cfe-commits
huhu233 wrote:
> I agree and custom lowering also gives a straight forward way to support
> vectors types as well.
You are right, I'll update the patch as soon, thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67552
___
cfe-commits mailing list
paulwalker-arm wrote:
I agree and custom lowering also gives a straight forward way to support
vectors types as well.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67552
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
nikic wrote:
Why does this need special handling in CGP instead of being a normal custom
lowering for FLDEXP?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67552
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
Changes
There are more efficient implementations for llvm.ldexp on different targets.
This patch transforms llvm.ldexp into target supported intrinsics before
lowering.
---
Full diff:
https://github.com/huhu233 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67552
There are more efficient implementations for llvm.ldexp on different targets.
This patch transforms llvm.ldexp into target supported intrinsics before
lowering.
>From dce0b8f8a76da24b27dd6ed61087e97b5f9415ec
