[clang] [Driver,AArch64] Remove AArch32-specific -m[no-]unaligned-access (PR #85441)

MaskRay wrote: Thanks for the comment. I'll abandon this. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85441 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [Driver,AArch64] Remove AArch32-specific -m[no-]unaligned-access (PR #85441)

https://github.com/MaskRay closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85441 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [Driver,AArch64] Remove AArch32-specific -m[no-]unaligned-access (PR #85441)

smithp35 wrote: > > If possible I would prefer to keep -m[no-]unaligned-access for AArch64. > > The history of this option name derives from Arm's proprietary compiler > > [developer.arm.com/documentation/dui0472/m/Compiler-Command-line-Options/--unaligned-accessno-unaligned-access](https://

[clang] [Driver,AArch64] Remove AArch32-specific -m[no-]unaligned-access (PR #85441)

MaskRay wrote: > If possible I would prefer to keep -m[no-]unaligned-access for AArch64. > > The history of this option name derives from Arm's proprietary compiler > [developer.arm.com/documentation/dui0472/m/Compiler-Command-line-Options/--unaligned-accessno-unaligned-access](https://deve

[clang] [Driver,AArch64] Remove AArch32-specific -m[no-]unaligned-access (PR #85441)

jroelofs wrote: > If Apple platforms need this option, I can keep it recognized but only for > Apple. I don't see any projects that use `-m(no-)unaligned-access`, but it could be that I don't have permissions on ones that do. I'll give our qualification team a heads-up if/when you land it, an

[clang] [Driver,AArch64] Remove AArch32-specific -m[no-]unaligned-access (PR #85441)

https://github.com/smithp35 commented: If possible I would prefer to keep -m[no-]unaligned-access for AArch64. The history of this option name derives from Arm's proprietary compiler https://developer.arm.com/documentation/dui0472/m/Compiler-Command-line-Options/--unaligned-accessno-unalign

[clang] [Driver,AArch64] Remove AArch32-specific -m[no-]unaligned-access (PR #85441)

MaskRay wrote: If Apple platforms need this option, I can keep it recognized but only for Apple. For ELF platforms, we should remove the GCC-unsupported-and-rejected aliases. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85441 ___ cfe-commits mailing lis

[clang] [Driver,AArch64] Remove AArch32-specific -m[no-]unaligned-access (PR #85441)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64 Author: Fangrui Song (MaskRay) Changes Follow-up to #85350: GCC only supports -m[no-]strict-align for AArch64 and rejects adding -m[no-]unaligned-access aliases. We inapropriated supported -m[no-]unaligned-access as aliases for non-AArch6

[clang] [Driver,AArch64] Remove AArch32-specific -m[no-]unaligned-access (PR #85441)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Fangrui Song (MaskRay) Changes Follow-up to #85350: GCC only supports -m[no-]strict-align for AArch64 and rejects adding -m[no-]unaligned-access aliases. We inapropriated supported -m[no-]unaligned-access as aliases for non-AArch64 due to a

[clang] [Driver,AArch64] Remove AArch32-specific -m[no-]unaligned-access (PR #85441)

https://github.com/MaskRay created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85441 Follow-up to #85350: GCC only supports -m[no-]strict-align for AArch64 and rejects adding -m[no-]unaligned-access aliases. We inapropriated supported -m[no-]unaligned-access as aliases for non-AArch64 due to an ea