[clang] [LTO][CodeGen] Test LTO pipeline choices more thoroughly (PR #65485)

2023-09-07 Thread Paul T Robinson via cfe-commits
https://github.com/pogo59 closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65485 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [LTO][CodeGen] Test LTO pipeline choices more thoroughly (PR #65485)

2023-09-06 Thread Matthew Voss via cfe-commits
https://github.com/ormris approved this pull request. LGTM https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65485 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [LTO][CodeGen] Test LTO pipeline choices more thoroughly (PR #65485)

2023-09-06 Thread Fangrui Song via cfe-commits
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request. Tests look good https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65485 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [LTO][CodeGen] Test LTO pipeline choices more thoroughly (PR #65485)

2023-09-06 Thread Paul T Robinson via cfe-commits
pogo59 wrote: This came up because Sony makes slightly different choices downstream, and we didn't get it exactly right in all cases. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65485 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org

[clang] [LTO][CodeGen] Test LTO pipeline choices more thoroughly (PR #65485)

2023-09-06 Thread Paul T Robinson via cfe-commits
https://github.com/pogo59 review_requested https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65485 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [LTO][CodeGen] Test LTO pipeline choices more thoroughly (PR #65485)

2023-09-06 Thread Paul T Robinson via cfe-commits
https://github.com/pogo59 created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65485: The test was looking only for the bitcode writer pass; it should check the full pipeline to make sure the choice is as intended. >From 6f5968e8e17ac4faae27bcaf2132a0df439f4c0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From:

[clang] [LTO][CodeGen] Test LTO pipeline choices more thoroughly (PR #65485)

2023-09-06 Thread Paul T Robinson via cfe-commits
https://github.com/pogo59 review_requested https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65485 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits