https://github.com/balazske approved this pull request.
OK, change can be merged before the simplification.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78693
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
benshi001 wrote:
> I have already a working code to simplify code repetitions, but want to merge
> first patches #76979 and #78180 (@NagyDonat could you look at these too?).
How about merge this patch first, then apply your simplification one? Since my
current one also is affected.
balazske wrote:
I have already a working code to simplify code repetitions, but want to merge
first patches #76979 and #78180 (@NagyDonat could you look at these too?).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78693
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/NagyDonat approved this pull request.
Looks reasonable.
My only concern is that several recent changes introduced similar, but separate
`evalXXX` methods that are used for modeling just one or two standard
functions. I have a vague suspicion that these could be
https://github.com/benshi001 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78693
>From f047ec2137d63f04668f0b07be362a25fb612622 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Shi
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 18:51:40 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][analyzer] Support 'getdelim' and 'getline' in
StreamChecker
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Ben Shi (benshi001)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78693.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/StreamChecker.cpp (+66)
- (modified)
https://github.com/benshi001 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78693
None
>From 9af31b61fce0df9a26e46f2c83e7cd8f3432b4a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Shi
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 18:51:40 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][analyzer] Support 'getdelim' and 'getline' in
