overmighty wrote:
cc @nickdesaulniers
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83313
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/efriedma-quic closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83313
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83313
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/overmighty updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83313
>From 6c224c82ec928f6c705af4a6bd0bacc573782bf0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: OverMighty
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 18:10:29 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Fix __builtin_popcountg not matching GCC
Our
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: OverMighty (overmighty)
Changes
Our implementation previously accepted signed arguments and performed
integer promotion on the argument. GCC's implementation requires an
unsigned argument and does not perform integer promotion on it.
See
https://github.com/overmighty created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83313
Our implementation previously accepted signed arguments and performed
integer promotion on the argument. GCC's implementation requires an
unsigned argument and does not perform integer promotion on it.
See
