https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85259
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
tbaederr wrote:
Right, I was just hoping for an existing unittest for `APValue`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85259
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
LGTM but this should be testable because `getAsString()` uses `printPretty()`:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/e6f63a942a45e3545332cd9a43982a69a4d5667b/clang/lib/AST/Interp/FunctionPointer.h#L53,
tbaederr wrote:
Ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85259
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
tbaederr wrote:
Ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85259
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
When printing an `_Atomic(some struct type)`, we would later run into an
assertion because we do a `Ty-castAsRecordType()`, which doesn't
work with an `AtomicType`.
Not sure how to best write a test for,
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85259
When printing an `_Atomic(some struct type)`, we would later run into an
assertion because we do a `Ty->castAs()`, which doesn't work with
an `AtomicType`.
Not sure how to best write a test for, this, but
