https://github.com/sam-mccall commented:
I'm not sold on the use of OptTable here, and think we should try some
alternatives. I don't want to be a burden, so I'm happy to try this out if you
like.
If it's just this tool then it's not that important, but I assume it's not.
There's possible
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Jordan Rupprecht (rupprecht)
Changes
Using OptTable to parse will allow including this tool in llvm-driver.
Because CommonOptionsParser is widely used and makes use of `cl::opt` flags, it
needs to be refactored to handle both. The
https://github.com/rupprecht created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89167
Using OptTable to parse will allow including this tool in llvm-driver.
Because CommonOptionsParser is widely used and makes use of `cl::opt` flags, it
needs to be refactored to handle both. The existing
