yxsamliu wrote:
> @yxsamliu I've just raised #70055 which fixes an issue with the new test
> here. Perhaps it might also allow you to remove the exclusion for
> `system-darwin`?
Yes it should allow it to remove exclusion of system-darwin. Thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68921
statham-arm wrote:
@yxsamliu I've just raised https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70055
which fixes an issue with the new test here. Perhaps it might also allow you to
remove the exclusion for `system-darwin`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68921
__
yxsamliu wrote:
[AMD Official Use Only - General]
Sorry I missed this failure.
Will fix it now.
Sam
From: Rainer Orth ***@***.***>
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2023 5:45 PM
To: llvm/llvm-project ***@***.***>
Cc: Liu, Yaxun (Sam) ***@***.***>; State change ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [llvm/llvm-pro
rorth wrote:
This patch also broke the [Solaris/amd64
buildbot](https://lab.llvm.org/staging/#/builders/8/builds/484). I suspect
this happens because that one is configured with `-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=X86`,
thus lacking cuda support. In fact, when manually building with support for
all ta
yxsamliu wrote:
[AMD Official Use Only - General]
Fixed by 9d10fbbb299eae4a63f1028274e2ffe92bf8e75a
From: Nico Weber ***@***.***>
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2023 8:03 PM
To: llvm/llvm-project ***@***.***>
Cc: Liu, Yaxun (Sam) ***@***.***>; State change ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [llvm/llvm-proj
yxsamliu wrote:
[AMD Official Use Only - General]
Will fix it now. Thanks.
Sam
From: Nico Weber ***@***.***>
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2023 8:03 PM
To: llvm/llvm-project ***@***.***>
Cc: Liu, Yaxun (Sam) ***@***.***>; State change ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [llvm/llvm-project] Let clang-cl su
nico wrote:
Hello, it looks like this breaks check-clang on mac:
http://45.33.8.238/macm1/71368/step_7.txt
Please take a look and revert for now if it takes a while to fix.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68921
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/yxsamliu closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68921
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/rnk approved this pull request.
Yep, we are fairly liberal about adding new clang options to the clang-cl mode,
especially if they are in the feature `-f` flag namespace, which we believe
will not conflict with MSVC flags.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68921
yxsamliu wrote:
ping. we tested it on Windows and it is able to compile both C++ and HIP
without issues.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68921
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
yxsamliu wrote:
The main objective is to make porting cmake files easier. Without it, you have
to use clang-cl.exe to compile C++ and clang.exe to compile HIP since the
options are not compatible. Now you can use clang-cl.exe to compile both, which
accepts both MSVC options and clang options.
Artem-B wrote:
@rnk -- would that be acceptable for clang-cl on windows?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68921
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Yaxun (Sam) Liu (yxsamliu)
Changes
clang-cl is a driver mode that accepts options of MSVC cl.exe as a drop-in
replacement for cl.exe. Currently clang-cl accepts mixed clang style options
and cl style options. To let clang-cl accept a clan
https://github.com/yxsamliu created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68921
clang-cl is a driver mode that accepts options of MSVC cl.exe as a drop-in
replacement for cl.exe. Currently clang-cl accepts mixed clang style options
and cl style options. To let clang-cl accept a clang-style
14 matches
Mail list logo
