@@ -2871,7 +2871,7 @@ C++ defect report implementation
status
https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/472.html;>472
drafting
Casting across protected inheritance
-Not resolved
+No
zygoloid wrote:
For `"no drafting" status, can we say
zygoloid wrote:
> None of the implementations seem to agree with the resolution of the DR:
> https://godbolt.org/z/a7nEvW5Gr
Yeah, I think this is a case where the wording is clear and everyone implements
it, but it doesn't actually do the right thing. The example in the issue "ought
to be"
cor3ntin wrote:
After additional archeology, I found the following minutes from Portland , 2012
> Core issue 472: Casting across protected inheritance
> _ Would the example work if P2 derived privately from N2?
> _ ... Yes.. Hm, that was a good point.
> redrafting.
Given that, I'd rather we
